The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #27 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #17 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #21 42 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #21 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #17 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #20 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #29 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #10 79 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #15 2 条评价 |
Choosing between AsyaSoft PMS and protel PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and operational complexity. Both platforms aim to streamline property management, but they differ significantly in functionality, support, and market presence. AsyaSoft, with zero reviews and no recent data, isn't a viable contender right now, while protel boasts over 105 reviews in the last six months, making it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking recent feedback and ongoing support.
Given the data, which platform will serve your hotel’s growth and efficiency more effectively?
AsyaSoft PMS by AsyaSoft shows no recent reviews or ratings, which makes assessing its current performance impossible. In contrast, protel PMS has a robust presence with over 105 reviews in the last six months, a strong 4.11 out of 5 overall rating, and an NPS score of 7.7/5, indicating high customer satisfaction.
While AsyaSoft claims to offer property management solutions, the lack of recent feedback and reviews suggests it struggles with market relevance or customer engagement. Conversely, protel’s recent reviews highlight its reliability, extensive features, and active support, making it the more trustworthy platform to consider.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, well-supported PMS with extensive integrations, go with protel. It’s better suited for hotels seeking reliable support, scalable cloud solutions, and a broad ecosystem of integrations, especially given its high review count and recent feedback.
If your hotel is small, has minimal operational complexity, or requires a basic system without extensive integrations, AsyaSoft’s limited data might suggest a lower-cost, straightforward solution—though its lack of recent reviews raises concerns about ongoing support and development.
In summary, for most hotels looking for a dependable, modern PMS, protel is the clear choice.
Protel scores a near-perfect 4.12 out of 5 for ease of use, with many recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process—"the system is user-friendly, and new staff can learn it fast," according to some users. It also benefits from consistent updates, although some mention occasional bugs.
AsyaSoft, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no current data on usability, but the absence of feedback suggests it may lack the polish, support, or ongoing development that users expect from modern PMS solutions.
Edge: protel.
Protel offers over 46 features, including revenue management, multi-currency support, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated payments, shift planning, and drag-and-drop tapechart—covering all core hotel operations. Its extensive ecosystem of over 1,200 integrations enhances its adaptability, making it suitable for complex property setups.
AsyaSoft, with zero features listed and no recent updates, appears to lack the depth and breadth of functionality necessary for more demanding hotel environments. Its limited data makes it impossible to compare, but the absence of features suggests it’s less capable.
Edge: protel.
Protel’s support scores a solid 3.95 out of 5, with recent reviews indicating generally helpful responses. Users appreciate the 24/7 multilingual support, though some mention occasional delays, especially during busy periods.
AsyaSoft has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to judge current support quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel operations, the lack of recent feedback on AsyaSoft raises concerns about its responsiveness and customer service.
Edge: protel.
Protel’s ecosystem boasts over 195 verified integrations, including popular systems like Innspire, Right Revenue, and RevControl. This extensive integration network allows hotels to connect with various revenue management, channel management, and marketing tools easily.
AsyaSoft lists no verified integrations or partners, suggesting limited connectivity options. Without a broad integration ecosystem, AsyaSoft may hinder your hotel’s ability to scale and automate processes efficiently.
Edge: protel.
Protel’s recent reviews consistently rate it above 4 out of 5, with an 80% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong satisfaction across various hotel segments, including independent and branded hotels. Hotels like Hôtel Paris Bastille and Hotel Nordic highlight improved efficiency, faster check-ins, and increased revenue.
AsyaSoft’s lack of recent reviews and ratings means we can't gauge current user satisfaction. The recent positive feedback for protel underscores its reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: protel.
AsyaSoft’s pricing is not publicly listed, which could imply a custom quote or a less transparent pricing model. In contrast, protel charges a base price of $500 with no additional implementation fees, offering clear and predictable costs.
The transparency in protel’s pricing makes budgeting easier and reduces surprises, whereas AsyaSoft’s opaque pricing model might pose challenges for decision-makers.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Protel is a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with a broad ecosystem, making it suitable for hotels that need scalability, integrations, and ongoing technological support. Its recent reviews reflect high satisfaction, reliability, and a proven track record in diverse hotel segments.
AsyaSoft, lacking recent data and features, appears less capable of meeting the needs of modern hotels, especially those seeking growth or operational efficiency. Its unknown support and integration capabilities make it a risky choice for most properties.
In conclusion, unless your hotel’s needs are minimal and budget constraints are tight, protel is the more dependable and scalable solution. It offers the features, support, and ecosystem that align with the expectations of today’s competitive hospitality market.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。AsyaSoft PMS 和 protel PMS (by Planet) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。AsyaSoft PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。protel PMS (by Planet) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
AsyaSoft PMS:否。protel PMS (by Planet):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AsyaSoft 的 HT Score 为 0,Planet 的为 33。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问