The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 503 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Planet 表现出色 在 功能和特点 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Revenue management module.
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 503 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 108 | 395 |
在分析了 503 条经验证的评价后,Planet 用户最看重其 功能和特点, 易于使用, 多物业管理,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 运营效率, 数据和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能和特点
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
+
多物业管理
▾
|
+
数据和报告
▾
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持问题
▾
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
−
定制和灵活性
▾
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
−
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 32 条评价 | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 50 条评价 | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 10 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #17 3 条评价 | #5 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #21 42 条评价 | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 34 条评价 | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #17 33 条评价 | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #20 9 条评价 | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #29 6 条评价 | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #10 79 条评价 | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #15 2 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Protel PMS by Planet and ThinkReservations PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market focus.
Protel PMS is a mature, globally recognized platform with extensive integration options and a strong presence across various hotel types. ThinkReservations, on the other hand, is a newer, highly rated system with a focus on simplicity, automation, and direct OTA integration.
Which of these systems better aligns with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions?
Protel PMS and ThinkReservations serve different hotel segments and operational styles, making their core strengths quite distinct. Protel’s robust, feature-rich platform is designed for hotels wanting deep customization, complex multi-property management, and extensive integration capabilities. ThinkReservations shines in small to mid-sized hotels and B&Bs, offering an intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and seamless OTA connectivity.
While Protel boasts over 105 reviews, most recent feedback is limited, with only 1 review in the last six months, indicating less current data. ThinkReservations, with 356 reviews and 4 recent reviews, provides a clearer picture of ongoing customer satisfaction. Notably, ThinkReservations’ NPS score of 9.68/10 and 97% likelihood to recommend underscore its strong market fit.
Do you prioritize a highly customizable system with extensive integrations or a straightforward, easy-to-use platform optimized for smaller operations?
If your hotel needs a system that simplifies daily operations while maximizing revenue through OTA integrations and upselling, ThinkReservations is the clear choice. Its focus on small hotels and B&Bs is reflected in features like automated guest messaging, mobile check-in, and a straightforward booking engine.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a comprehensive, scalable solution with multi-currency support, detailed guest profiles, and a vast ecosystem of over 1,200 integrations, Protel PMS is better suited. Its flexibility supports diverse property types, from resorts to city hotels, especially if you’re planning multi-property management or customization.
For hotels seeking rapid deployment and minimal complexity, ThinkReservations excels. For those with complex, multi-location needs and high customization, Protel offers more adaptability.
ThinkReservations earns a stellar 4.82/5 in ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and staff-friendly design. Many users describe it as “like adding another employee,” appreciating the straightforward setup and smooth reservation management.
Protel, rated at 4.12/5 for ease, is generally user-friendly but has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and customizable options. Some reviews mention slow response times and bugs, especially concerning support and updates, which can hamper staff adoption.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Protel offers 15 exclusive features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, integrated ID scanners, and full-stack payments—ideal for hotels requiring complex operations and detailed reporting. Its extensive integration ecosystem, with over 1,200 verified partners, is a standout advantage.
ThinkReservations has 8 unique features, such as channel management, online check-in, automated reminders, and a dedicated mobile app—all tailored for small hotels seeking operational automation. Its focus on guest messaging, upselling, and OTA connectivity makes it highly functional for its segment.
Edge: Protel PMS.
ThinkReservations consistently receives praise for its support, with a 4.82/5 support rating and reviews highlighting quick, knowledgeable responses and excellent service. Users report that support staff are accessible, friendly, and helpful, often describing the experience as “like having another employee.”
Protel’s support scores a modest 3.95/5, with reviews pointing to longer response times and frustrations over slower support, especially post-acquisition. While some praise its technical expertise, many note that support can be less responsive during busy periods.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Protel’s ecosystem includes 195 verified partners, covering a broad spectrum from global OTAs to revenue management and CRM tools. Its extensive integration options are especially valuable for hotels seeking a connected, multi-system environment.
ThinkReservations offers 16 verified partners, including major OTAs like Airbnb, Booking.com, and Expedia, as well as channel management and guest messaging tools. While smaller, its focus on core integrations makes it effective for small to mid-sized hotels.
Edge: Protel PMS.
ThinkReservations outperforms in recent reviews, with a 4.88/5 rating and 97% likelihood to recommend, especially among small hotels and B&Bs. Reviewers praise its ease of use, support, and ability to increase revenue through upselling.
Protel, with a 4.11/5 score and only 1 recent review, is viewed favorably by larger hotels and those needing extensive customization. Independent hotels rate it 4.5/5, but overall, recent user sentiment favors ThinkReservations.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Both systems are priced at a base of $500 per month, with no trial or implementation fees reported. However, additional costs may arise from optional modules, integrations, or customizations, especially in Protel’s case.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Protel PMS and ThinkReservations cater to very different market segments. Protel excels in large, complex, or multi-property environments that require extensive customization and integration. ThinkReservations is designed for small to medium hotels that want an easy-to-use, automated platform with strong OTA connections.
If your hotel values detailed customization, global reach, and integration ecosystem, Protel is the better choice despite support concerns. However, if you prioritize simplicity, rapid deployment, and high customer satisfaction, ThinkReservations offers a more reliable and user-friendly experience.
Ultimately, your decision should reflect your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,protel PMS (by Planet) 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 31 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。
ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。
该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。
强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。protel PMS (by Planet) 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
protel PMS (by Planet):否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Planet 的 HT Score 为 33,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问