The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Authorize.net 表现出色 .
Zil Money 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
基于 HTR 上 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 58 |
在分析了 58 条经验证的评价后,Authorize.net 用户最看重其 ,而 Zil Money 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 增强客户体验, 付款处理速度。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
增强客户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
付款处理速度
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
第三方集成
▾
|
|
|
−
审批流程
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Authorize.net and Zil Money for your hotel's payment processing needs hinges on your operational priorities and the scale of your financial management. Both platforms aim to facilitate transactions, but they diverge significantly in features, ease of use, support, and market presence. Authorize.net, despite a long-standing reputation, currently lacks recent reviews and user ratings, raising questions about its current relevance. Conversely, Zil Money boasts a recent surge in positive feedback, with more reviews over the past six months, indicating its growing credibility.
Authorize.net offers a payment gateway service primarily focused on credit card and electronic check transactions. Zil Money, while also handling payments, emphasizes its broader financial management toolkit, including payroll, invoicing, and multiple payment methods. Do you need a straightforward gateway or a comprehensive financial platform? The choice depends on your hotel’s specific requirements.
Authorize.net is a globally recognized payment gateway that processes credit card and e-check payments securely, making it suitable for hotels with high online booking volumes. However, its lack of recent reviews and a zero rating cast doubt on its current performance and customer satisfaction.
Zil Money, on the other hand, has a robust 62.9 HTR score, with 54 recent reviews in the last six months, and an 87% likelihood to recommend. Its user reviews consistently praise its ease of use, support, and value. Do you prioritize a platform with proven recent success and active user feedback? Zil Money clearly outperforms Authorize.net in recent data, making it the more reliable choice now.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, secure gateway for credit card and electronic check payments, Authorize.net might seem appealing. Still, the platform's zero reviews and no recent updates suggest it may not deliver the responsiveness or innovation your hotel requires.
If your hotel benefits from a broad financial toolkit—including online payments, invoicing, payroll, and multi-currency support—Zil Money is the better fit. Its extensive feature set (15 features exclusive to it), high user satisfaction, and active reviews demonstrate its ability to support diverse financial operations effectively.
For hotels seeking minimal complexity and proven stability, Authorize.net could suffice, but for those wanting a flexible, well-supported platform with ongoing updates, Zil Money is the clear choice.
Authorize.net's interface and onboarding process are not well-rated, with a score of 0/5, and user reviews do not provide recent feedback, making it difficult to gauge ease of use. Its lack of recent reviews suggests potential usability challenges or stagnation.
Zil Money scores 4.5/5 for ease of use, with most reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward setup process. Users mention that its platform reduces onboarding time and simplifies financial management, a crucial factor for busy hotel teams.
Edge: Zil Money.
Authorize.net offers no unique features beyond basic payment gateway functions. Conversely, Zil Money provides 15 features, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Contactless Payments, Payment Splitting, and more—capabilities that directly support hotel financial operations.
The breadth of features in Zil Money allows your team to handle complex transactions and multi-channel payments from a single platform. Its feature set is designed for flexibility and operational efficiency, giving it a distinct advantage.
Edge: Zil Money.
Authorize.net’s support ratings are nonexistent or unreported, and with no recent reviews, it’s challenging to assess support quality. This lack of recent feedback raises concerns about responsiveness, especially if issues arise during busy seasons.
Zil Money’s support scores 4.5/5, with reviews highlighting its quick response times and helpful assistance. Users appreciate its customer service, although some suggest that responsiveness could be improved further. Still, it currently outperforms Authorize.net in support.
Edge: Zil Money.
Authorize.net has a single verified partner integration with Yanolja Cloud Solution, limiting its compatibility options. Zil Money, however, offers no verified partners yet but claims API access and a focus on expanding its integrations.
Despite fewer official partnerships, Zil Money’s open API allows for future customization and integration with various financial and hotel management tools. Its flexibility makes it more adaptable for evolving hotel tech stacks.
Edge: Zil Money.
Given the absence of recent reviews for Authorize.net, it’s impossible to gauge current customer satisfaction. Zil Money’s 54 recent reviews and an 87% likelihood to recommend demonstrate strong, recent approval among hoteliers.
Hotels across various segments—most notably in boutique, budget, and branded hotels—rate Zil Money highly, praising its ease, support, and value. The recent, active feedback indicates it is the preferred choice among hotel operators now.
Edge: Zil Money.
Authorize.net does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a free trial, making cost comparisons difficult. Its pricing is likely variable and may include setup fees, monthly fees, or per-transaction charges, typical for payment gateways.
Zil Money charges a flat $400 base price with no mention of ongoing subscription fees, although specific transaction costs are not detailed here. Its transparent pricing with a 15-day free trial offers better predictability for hotel finance planning.
While both lack detailed, comparable pricing data, Zil Money’s straightforward approach and active trial offer a clearer value proposition.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their capabilities: Authorize.net is a payment gateway with minimal recent activity, while Zil Money is a financial management platform with a broad feature set and active user base. Its high ratings, recent reviews, and comprehensive tools make it more suited to hotels seeking more than just card processing.
Choose Authorize.net if your hotel only needs a simple, reliable, and widely compatible payment gateway and you’re comfortable managing without recent support or updates. However, for most hotels aiming for ease, flexibility, and ongoing support, Zil Money delivers a more complete financial platform.
If you value recent user feedback and a platform that actively supports hotel operations, Zil Money is the clear winner. Its extensive features and high satisfaction rates make it the safer, smarter choice moving forward.
In summary, Zil Money’s recent reviews, active support, and comprehensive features set it apart in the hotel payments landscape. While Authorize.net remains a known name, its silence in recent feedback suggests it may no longer be the best fit for modern hotel finance needs. Your team should prioritize platforms that are actively supported and feature-rich—Zil Money ticks those boxes convincingly.
支付处理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Authorize.net |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Authorize.net 和 Zil Money 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|---|
| 多币种结算 | ||
| 定期付款 | ||
| 小费功能 | ||
| 授权调整 | ||
| 部分捕获 | ||
| 链接支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Authorize.net 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Authorize.net 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Authorize.net:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Authorize.net 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 63。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问