The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Authorize.net 表现出色 .
ROH 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
基于 HTR 上 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 69 |
在分析了 69 条经验证的评价后,Authorize.net 用户最看重其 ,而 ROH 用户则强调 automation of payments and invoicing, 用户友好的界面, 培训和支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好的界面
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和支持
▾
|
|
|
+
实时报告和通知
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 21 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 25 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 31 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 28 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #3 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 61 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #3 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right payments processing software can significantly impact your hotel's financial operations and guest experience. Authorize.net, a longstanding gateway provider, offers basic transaction processing but lacks recent updates, reviews, and a comprehensive feature set. ROH, by contrast, is a newer, dedicated hospitality platform with a robust feature suite, recent positive reviews, and high user satisfaction. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s growth and operational needs?
Both products aim to streamline payment workflows, yet they diverge sharply in user experience, feature depth, and overall hotel industry focus. Authorize.net is a generic payment gateway primarily suited for retail and e-commerce, while ROH is tailored specifically for hotels, integrating invoicing, scheduling, and real-time reporting. Are you prioritizing a broad payment solution or a hospitality-specific platform?
Authorize.net has been a leading payment gateway for years, but it shows no recent reviews or active user feedback, making it difficult to gauge current performance or hotel satisfaction. In contrast, ROH boasts 65 reviews within the last six months, with a near-perfect NPS score of 9.91, reflecting high hotel user ratings and consistent recent feedback.
Authorize.net’s reviews are nonexistent or outdated, and it has a zero-star score across all categories on HotelTechReport, suggesting it is no longer a competitive choice for hotels. ROH, on the other hand, scores 100 on the HTR scale and a 4.97/5 for customer support, with hotels praising its ease of use and operational efficiency. Would your hotel benefit from a platform with active, recent hotel-specific feedback?
If your hotel needs a dedicated payments platform that automates invoicing, manages guest payments efficiently, and integrates seamlessly into hotel operations, ROH is the clear choice. It offers 19 unique features such as refund management, payment splitting, recurring payments, and accepts major card brands, all tailored for hospitality.
Authorize.net, with no listed features or recent updates, is better suited for businesses needing a simple, generic gateway for online payments without hotel-specific functionalities. If your team values user-friendly automation, real-time notifications, and quick onboarding, go with ROH. For basic credit card processing without industry-specific tools, Authorize.net might suffice—but it’s not recommended given its lack of recent hotel reviews and support.
ROH scores 4.95 out of 5 for ease of use, supported by recent reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and minimal learning curve. Users repeatedly mention how simple it is for both staff and clients to make and receive payments, with reviews praising the platform’s straightforward design.
Authorize.net has a zero-star rating for ease of use on HotelTechReport, with no recent reviews or positive feedback. Its outdated interface and lack of recent hotel feedback suggest it may not meet modern usability standards. If a user-friendly experience is a priority, edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 features, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, installments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, chargeback management, and PCI compliance—features that are critical for modern hotel payments. Authorize.net does not list any unique features, indicating it is a basic gateway without hotel-specific functionalities.
ROH’s comprehensive feature set transforms payment processing into a strategic tool—saving time, reducing manual errors, and enabling flexible billing options. Authorize.net’s lack of features makes it suitable only for straightforward credit card transactions, not complex hotel payments. Edge: ROH.
ROH scores 4.97 out of 5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and support staff’s expertise. Hotels say support is “great,” and onboarding is “smooth,” emphasizing their high satisfaction with ongoing assistance.
Authorize.net, lacking recent reviews and a support rating on HotelTechReport, does not demonstrate active or effective customer service. Given the importance of reliable support in payments, ROH’s high support score provides peace of mind. Edge: ROH.
Both platforms have only one verified integration partner: Authorize.net with Yanolja Cloud and ROH with Oracle Hospitality. Shared integrations are nonexistent, but ROH’s partnership with Oracle Hospitality— a major hotel PMS provider—suggests better compatibility and future expansion potential.
Given the limited current integrations, neither platform excels on this front. However, the strategic industry partnerships of ROH give it an edge for hotels seeking seamless operational integration. Edge: ROH.
ROH’s recent reviews reflect a high hotel satisfaction score (NPS 9.91/5), with hotels praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Its user base includes various hotel segments, notably luxury, resorts, and independent hotels, with high ratings across the board.
Authorize.net’s review count is zero, and its overall rating is zero, indicating no recent hotel feedback or satisfaction data. For hotels seeking peer-validated performance, ROH’s recent high ratings clearly position it as the preferred platform. Edge: ROH.
Authorize.net’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may lack transparent or straightforward pricing models. In contrast, ROH charges a $100 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or setup fees, making its costs predictable and transparent.
Given the lack of clear pricing for Authorize.net and the straightforward subscription fee for ROH, the latter provides better value clarity. If pricing transparency and predictable costs matter, ROH is the better choice.
Not ideal if your hotel desires automation, invoice management, or industry-specific integrations. Given the lack of recent reviews, it’s not recommended for hotels seeking a modern, hotel-focused payments system.
Not ideal if your property is a very small operation with minimal payment complexity or if you prefer a basic, free payment gateway without advanced features. ROH’s features and recent hotel reviews make it a strong fit for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency.
The core difference is that ROH is a hospitality-focused payments platform with advanced features, recent positive hotel reviews, and high support scores. Authorize.net remains a basic, generic payment gateway with no recent hotel feedback or industry-specific tools, making it less suitable for modern hotel needs.
If your hotel requires automation, real-time reporting, and a platform designed for hospitality, ROH is the clear choice. It offers more features, better support, and proven hotel satisfaction—making it a strategic asset for improving payment workflows.
However, if your hotel only needs simple online credit card processing and minimal automation, and you are comfortable with a platform lacking recent hotel-specific features, Authorize.net may suffice—but it’s no longer a recommended solution given current hotel industry standards.
In conclusion, for most hotels, especially those looking for a reliable, feature-rich, and highly-rated payments system, ROH is the superior option. Its recent reviews, extensive hotel-specific features, and high user satisfaction make it the smarter, more future-proof investment.
支付处理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Authorize.net |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Authorize.net 和 ROH 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Authorize.net |
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款拆分 | ||
| 定期付款 | ||
| 退款管理 | ||
| 部分捕获 | ||
| 链接支付 | ||
| 预授权 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH 因其直观的界面而备受赞誉,酒店员工和客户均可轻松使用。该平台简化了付款和收款流程,带来更顺畅的交易体验,并提升用户满意度。
用户对 ROH 提供的初始培训和持续支持表示赞赏,这有助于确保软件的顺利采用。这对于新用户的入门或有效解决复杂问题尤其有益。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在... 虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在集成。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Authorize.net 和 ROH 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Authorize.net 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ROH 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ROH 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Authorize.net:否。ROH:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Authorize.net 的 HT Score 为 0,ROH 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问