The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
AutoClerk, Inc. 表现出色 .
Noovy 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 3 | 25 |
在分析了 28 条经验证的评价后,AutoClerk, Inc. 用户最看重其 ,而 Noovy 用户则强调 易于使用, 客户服务, 自动付款处理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
自动付款处理
▾
|
|
|
+
直接 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
设计
▾
|
|
|
−
报告工具
▾
|
|
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #39 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #38 12 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #54 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #72 1 条评价 | #38 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #67 0 条评价 | #54 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #64 0 条评价 | #52 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #57 1 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #22 23 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #16 2 条评价 |
Choosing between AutoClerk and Noovy depends on your specific hotel needs. Both products aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in scope, features, and market presence. AutoClerk has been around since 1985, focusing on independent hotels and chains, offering traditional property management functionalities. Noovy, founded in 2017, positions itself as an all-in-one platform designed for modern hoteliers seeking simplicity and automation. Do you prioritize a long-standing provider or a newer, feature-rich system?
AutoClerk provides a solid PMS with integrated revenue tools, but its limited reviews and regional presence may concern you. Noovy boasts more recent, extensive reviews and a broader international footprint. Are you ready to explore how each system stacks up across key hotel management aspects?
AutoClerk and Noovy both aim to improve hotel operational efficiency, but they approach it differently. AutoClerk offers a traditional PMS with integrated revenue management and guest profiles, primarily serving US-based independent and chain hotels. Its usability ratings are high (4.33/5), but recent reviews are lacking, which may suggest limited ongoing support or updates.
Noovy, on the other hand, provides an all-in-one platform with 48 features, including channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and guest communication. Its user-friendly interface (4.84/5) and recent reviews (19 in the last 6 months) indicate active development and a strong user base. Do you need a mature, proven system or an innovative, comprehensive platform?
If your hotel needs a well-established, straightforward PMS with revenue management, AutoClerk is a candidate, especially if your team values familiar software with solid support. It's suitable for hotels that prioritize traditional operations over extensive automation.
If your hotel seeks an all-in-one system that merges PMS, channel management, booking, and revenue tools in one platform, Noovy is the clear choice. Its high user ratings, recent reviews, and 40 integrations make it ideal for hotels that want to streamline multiple functions without juggling multiple vendors. For independent hotels or boutique properties aiming for automation and cost-effective solutions, Noovy is the better fit.
AutoClerk's interface scores 4.33/5, with reviews describing it as "easy to learn and teach," but some users find its design outdated. Support is highly rated (4.33/5), with 24/7 availability and quick issue resolution, easing staff adoption. However, the learning curve may be slightly steeper if you seek modern design aesthetics.
Noovy surpasses AutoClerk with an even higher UI rating of 4.84/5, praised for its intuitive, attractive interface and straightforward onboarding, which reduces staff training time. Support is also excellent (4.89/5), with reviews emphasizing speed and friendliness. Edge: Noovy.
AutoClerk offers core property management features, including guest profiles, loyalty, and basic reporting, with 0 unique features listed. Its integrated revenue management and web booking are notable but limited to its core offerings.
Noovy offers 48 features, including a channel manager, booking engine, integrated CRS, automated night audit, Guest CRM, digital registration, task management, and real-time reporting. It also features native guest messaging, ID scanning, and advanced revenue tools. Edge: Noovy.
AutoClerk's customer support is rated 4.33/5, with reviews highlighting "support is 24/7 and I have had 100% resolution on first call." Users appreciate their responsiveness, though some mention the interface could improve.
Noovy edges out with a support rating of 4.89/5, supported by numerous positive reviews emphasizing "fast, friendly, and very good support." Users report quick resolutions and consistent assistance, making support a key strength for Noovy. Edge: Noovy.
AutoClerk has 8 verified partners, including SiteMinder, Actabl, and Duetto, mostly focused on North American markets. Its limited integrations may restrict connectivity with third-party tools.
Noovy offers 40 verified partners, including Omnibees, RevControl, GuestRevu, and Revinate, with extensive OTA and revenue management integrations. Its broader integration landscape allows for more flexibility and automation. Edge: Noovy.
AutoClerk's reviews are sparse, with just 3 reviews and a mixed overall rating of 3.5/5. Recent feedback is unavailable, which diminishes confidence in current performance.
Noovy has 19 recent reviews, with a perfect 5/5 rating from the majority of users, especially in boutique, city center, and budget hotels. Its current review scores and volume indicate higher overall satisfaction. Edge: Noovy.
AutoClerk does not publicly list pricing, suggesting it may be more expensive or customized based on hotel size. Implementation and ongoing costs are likely higher, typical of traditional PMS providers.
Noovy charges €£$5 per room per month, a transparent and competitive rate that includes all features and 24/7 support. Noovy’s straightforward pricing simplifies budgeting and decision-making.
Not ideal if you want a highly modern, integrated system or rapid feature updates.
Not ideal if you need a highly regionalized or legacy system with limited updates.
AutoClerk offers a traditional, reliable PMS mainly suited to US-based hotels that need straightforward operations and revenue tools. Its limited recent reviews and regional focus may hinder its appeal to international, modern hoteliers.
Noovy provides a comprehensive, user-friendly platform with 48 features, extensive integrations, and excellent recent reviews. It's tailored to hotels that want a cost-effective, all-in-one system to automate and connect their operations.
Choose AutoClerk if your hotel values a long-standing system with proven revenue management tools and support. Opt for Noovy if you seek a modern, integrated platform that simplifies your daily tasks and enhances guest experiences.
If your hotel is looking for a flexible, highly rated solution with active development and support, Noovy is the clear winner. For more traditional, regional-focused needs, AutoClerk remains a viable choice, but limited recent data should give you pause.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Autoclerk (PMS) 和 Noovy PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 36 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Autoclerk (PMS) 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Autoclerk (PMS) 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Autoclerk (PMS):否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AutoClerk, Inc. 的 HT Score 为 0,Noovy 的为 71。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案