The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 756 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
SHR Group 表现出色 在 customer support and onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 Boutique Hotels 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
innRoad 表现出色 在 客户支持质量 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
在分析了 756 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 主动客户支持, 集成功能, 直观的界面,而 innRoad 用户则强调 客户支持质量, 定制和灵活性, 预订仪表板和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
主动客户支持
▾
|
+
客户支持质量
▾
|
|
+
集成功能
▾
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
直观的界面
▾
|
+
预订仪表板和报告
▾
|
|
+
费率和库存管理
▾
|
+
胶带图表和颜色编码
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
后端导航改进
▾
|
−
费率和付款管理
▾
|
|
−
视觉与美学设计
▾
|
−
用户界面故障
▾
|
|
−
支持文档和培训
▾
|
−
移动可访问性和应用程序功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 76 条评价 | #4 150 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 369 条评价 | #13 41 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 39 条评价 | #15 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 16 条评价 | #16 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 232 条评价 | #9 86 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 320 条评价 | #13 37 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 166 条评价 | #12 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | #7 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 39 条评价 | #1 229 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 440 条评价 | #29 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 11 条评价 | #26 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 3 条评价 | #25 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel's growth and operational efficiency. Both SHR Booking Engine (BE) by SHR Group and innRoad Booking Engine aim to increase direct bookings, streamline management, and improve guest experiences. While they share core functionalities, the differences in ratings, features, and market presence will influence your decision.
With SHR Group's extensive review base and higher recent customer satisfaction, it strongly positions itself for hoteliers seeking proven reliability. But is it the best fit for your property? Let's explore how these platforms compare in detail.
Both SHR BE and innRoad target similar problems: boosting direct bookings, simplifying reservation management, and integrating with other hotel systems. SHR BE demonstrates a more comprehensive approach with a higher overall rating (4.86/5) based on 339 reviews, compared to innRoad's 4.68/5 from 200 reviews.
Recent reviews favor SHR Group, with no recent negative feedback, highlighting ongoing product updates and support quality. innRoad, meanwhile, has fewer recent reviews, which slightly diminishes confidence in current performance. Do you prioritize a platform with a larger, more active review base?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, feature-rich booking engine with proven support and extensive integration options, go with SHR BE. Its strong reputation among multi-property and boutique hotels makes it ideal for properties looking to maximize online direct bookings.
If your hotel values ease of use, straightforward implementation, and cost-effective solutions—especially for smaller properties or those new to digital booking—innRoad is a solid choice. It excels in simplicity, multi-channel integration, and offers functionalities like multi-room reservations and group booking management. For hotels seeking quick results and easy management, innRoad is the better fit.
SHR Group’s ease of use ranks at 4.67/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and helpful onboarding, though some note backend navigation can be improved. Customers frequently mention that initial setup and ongoing management are straightforward, especially with proactive support.
innRoad scores slightly lower at 4.44/5, with users citing a user-friendly design, but some experience glitches and slow loading times that hamper daily operations. Its interface is more straightforward for small properties but may require more training for complex setups.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR BE offers 15 exclusive features such as A/B testing, urgency messaging, loyalty program integration, and social media bookings—tools that help increase conversions and customer engagement. InnRoad provides 23 unique features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, a property management system, and native email marketing.
Shared features total 31, but SHR’s specialized options for marketing and personalization give it an edge for properties aiming to optimize direct booking strategies. innRoad’s strengths lie in operational functionalities like group reservations and multi-language support.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group’s customer support scores 4.86/5, with reviews highlighting responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive assistance, especially praising account managers. Many reviewers state their issues are resolved swiftly, with comments like, "The SHR support team is outstanding and always available."
innRoad’s support scores lower at 4.44/5, with some users noting slower response times and frustration with technical help, especially regarding glitches and group management. While generally helpful, innRoad’s support is less consistently praised.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group boasts 81 verified partners, including industry leaders like Profitroom, Revinate, and Tripadvisor, with 5 shared integrations. Its vast partner network enables seamless connectivity with various PMS, CRM, and digital marketing tools.
innRoad has 34 verified partners, including QuickBooks and Onity, with 5 shared partners. Despite fewer integrations, innRoad covers essential channels and operational tools.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
Based on recent reviews, SHR Group’s overall rating (4.86/5) is significantly higher than innRoad’s (4.68/5). SHR receives more reviews in the last 6 months, indicating ongoing user engagement and satisfaction.
Hoteliers in boutique, city-center, and resort segments rate SHR higher, praising its reliability and support. innRoad’s property types—mainly small hotels and motels—also rate it well, but fewer recent reviews mean slightly less confidence.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing, but neither offers free plans or monthly flat rates. Pricing is typically customized based on property size and needs, with no hidden fees reported.
If you need transparent, predictable costs, consider reaching out directly for quotes, but be aware that SHR Group’s higher overall ratings and reviews suggest value in its investment.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small operation with minimal online booking needs or prefers simple, straightforward solutions.
Not ideal if you need advanced marketing features, extensive integrations, or complex revenue management tools.
SHR Group’s booking engine outperforms in reviews, features, and integrations, making it a more robust solution for hotels aiming to grow their direct bookings and optimize revenue. Its higher ratings and recent reviews demonstrate continuous product improvement and strong support, giving hoteliers confidence in its reliability.
innRoad offers a straightforward, user-friendly platform with essential operational features, ideal for smaller hotels and properties new to online booking. While its feature set and support are solid, it may lack the depth needed for complex, multi-property management.
If your hotel needs proven reliability, extensive integrations, and advanced marketing tools, SHR BE is the clear choice. For properties prioritizing simplicity, quick setup, and cost-effectiveness, innRoad is an effective, reliable option.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软... 用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软件的使用非常有价值。30 篇评论涵盖了此主题。
经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,... 经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,一些用户希望改进与其他系统和平台的集成。此主题出现在 18 篇评论中。
用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的... 用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的导航有助于提高整体效率。此主题在 20 条评论中被提及。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户指出,虽然前端很人性化,但后端导航和过滤选项可以更加直观和人性化。这些方面的改进可以显著提高效率和用户满意度。此主题在 12 条评论中被提及。
一些用户建议可以改进预订引擎的视觉美感。增强用户界面的精致和现代设计可以进一步提升整体预订体验,并使其更具视觉吸引力。6 篇评论讨论了此主题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持服务通常因响应迅速、知识渊博、及时解决问题而受到称赞。然而,也有人提到响应速度慢,以及与英语不流利的支持人员沟通不畅,这可能会让用户感到沮丧。
用户经常提到 InnRoad 提供的高度定制和灵活性,特别是在房间外观、计费功能和报告方面。这使酒店能够根据其特定需求定制软件,从而提高运营效率和客人满意度。
预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明... 预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明智的决策并提高整体酒店绩效。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对该系统管理费率和付款(包括费率变更和分期付款)的能力表示赞赏。然而,有些人认为这些功能复杂且耗时,这表明需要更精简的流程来提高效率和客户满意度。
一些用户报告称,用户界面出现故障且加载速度缓慢,这可能会扰乱日常操作。系统冻结和功能错误等问题表明需要增强稳定性和速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 innRoad Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad Booking Engine 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Booking Engine (BE):否。innRoad Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 46,innRoad 的为 34。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问