The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #48 0 条评价 | #7 101 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 36 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #6 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #8 70 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #9 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #11 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #12 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #30 0 条评价 | #6 166 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #21 4 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly impact your operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Beds24 and innRoad both aim to streamline hotel operations but approach the problem differently. Beds24 offers a more affordable, all-in-one platform with broad automation features, while innRoad emphasizes ease of use, robust integrations, and comprehensive channel management. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and growth ambitions.
Beds24 has a limited review count and no recent reviews, making its data less reliable. In contrast, innRoad boasts 148 recent reviews, with a high overall rating and a strong likelihood to recommend. Which product truly aligns with your hotel’s priorities?
Beds24 and innRoad both address core hotel management needs like reservations, channel management, and guest communications. Beds24's main strength lies in its extensive third-party integrations and automation options, but it struggles with user feedback, as evidenced by a 0/5 overall rating and no recent reviews. InnRoad, on the other hand, has a 4.72/5 rating based on 148 recent reviews, emphasizing its user-friendly design, support, and high customer satisfaction.
While Beds24 claims to serve property managers and owners across the globe, its lack of recent, verified reviews makes it hard to gauge current performance. InnRoad’s recent reviews highlight its ease of onboarding, quick setup, and tangible revenue improvements. Do you want a platform with proven recent customer satisfaction or one with a long-standing claim to automation and integrations?
If your hotel is an independent property or small chain seeking a low-cost solution with channel management and automation, Beds24 might seem appealing. It offers unique features like multi-lingual support, automated reminders, and employee messaging, which are beneficial for tech-savvy teams.
However, if your hotel needs a highly rated, easy-to-use system with robust reservation, billing, and support features, innRoad is the better choice. It is especially suited for independent hotels, resorts, and boutique properties aiming to increase direct bookings, improve operational efficiency, and enjoy dedicated support.
In summary, go with Beds24 if budget is your primary concern and you’re comfortable navigating a less-reviewed platform. Opt for innRoad if recent customer satisfaction, support, and ease of use are your top priorities.
Based on current reviews, innRoad scores a 4.47/5 for ease of use from 148 recent reviews, highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users praise innRoad’s user-friendly design, with support staff credited for helping new users get comfortable quickly.
Beds24, however, scores 0/5 in ease of use, indicating significant usability issues or a lack of recent, verified feedback. Its complex features may appeal to technically experienced teams, but new users could face a steep learning curve.
Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad offers a significantly larger suite of features—50 unique capabilities—compared to Beds24’s 5 exclusive features. InnRoad’s tools include multi-currency support, website development, online checkout, housecleaning modules, guest communication via SMS, and a revenue management module. These features cater to hotels seeking a full-stack operational approach.
Beds24’s exclusive features focus on payment requests, multi-lingual support, automated reminders, employee messaging, and pricing intelligence—useful but limited in scope. If comprehensive functionality is your goal, innRoad’s expansive feature set clearly beats Beds24.
Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad’s recent reviews consistently praise its 24/7 live support, with users commenting on its availability and helpfulness. Customers highlight that “support is exceptional” and value the dedicated onboarding assistance, citing quick resolutions.
Beds24 offers no recent reviews or detailed feedback on support, which raises concerns about ongoing customer service. Without recent user experiences, it’s difficult to assess its current support quality.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad provides 34 verified partners, including major OTAs and tools like QuickBooks, Revinate, and RateGain, offering extensive connectivity options. It also supports unlimited channels without extra costs, facilitating broad distribution.
Beds24 has 19 verified partners, including key OTAs like Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com, with some unique integrations like ChargeAutomation and PriceLabs. However, its smaller partner network limits flexibility.
Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad outperforms Beds24 in ratings due to its recent reviews: 4.72/5 overall, with high scores across ease of use, support, and value. Hotels in various segments, especially independent and boutique hotels, praise its simplicity and support team.
Beds24 has no recent reviews, and its 0/5 rating reflects a lack of current user feedback. This absence makes it impossible to validate its performance or hotel satisfaction.
Edge: innRoad.
Beds24 charges a flat monthly fee of $100, with no free trial or freemium options. This straightforward pricing makes it attractive for small properties but limits scalability.
innRoad’s fee is $600/month, also without a free trial, but it includes a more comprehensive set of features and support. Its higher price point is justified by its expanded capabilities and recent positive reviews.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes user-friendly interfaces, recent support, and extensive features.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a cheaper, minimal feature system or has very limited IT resources.
The core difference lies in their current support levels and feature sets. InnRoad offers a proven, well-rated platform with extensive integrations, dedicated support, and a focus on increasing direct bookings. Beds24, with its limited recent reviews and fewer features, appears less reliable for now.
If your hotel values simplicity, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive support, innRoad is the clear choice. Choose Beds24 only if budget constraints outweigh the need for recent validation or broad capabilities.
In conclusion, innRoad’s high review volume and recent performance data make it the more dependable solution for hotels seeking growth and support. Beds24 might suit niche users with specific automation needs but lacks the current trusted reputation.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然 Innroad 总体上是用户友好的,但 UI 和导航等某些方面可以更加直观。这些方面的改进将使新用户受益,并使日常操作更加高效。
Innroad 直观的预订管理系统简化了整个预订流程。它提供全面的数据访问,使员工能够高效地处理多房间预订和客人信息。
24/7 客户支持因其可用性和所提供帮助的质量而受到称赞。然而,一些用户报告称,偶尔会遇到沟通和解决速度方面的困难。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户提到频繁更新有时会降低系统性能,影响生产力。尽管更新带来好处,但建议更高效地推出并尽量减少干扰。
一些评论呼吁改进自定义报告功能。用户建议提供更详细、可自定义的报告选项,以便更深入地了解客户行为和运营指标。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Beds24 和 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Beds24 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad All-in-1 HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Beds24:否。innRoad All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Beds24 的 HT Score 为 0,innRoad 的为 27。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问