The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #48 0 条评价 | #15 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #20 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #16 29 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #15 18 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #17 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #13 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #30 0 条评价 | #19 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #15 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #22 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #8 2 条评价 |
When choosing a hotel management system, your primary concern is often how well the software handles core operations, supports your team, and integrates with your existing tools. Beds24 and Preno both aim to streamline hotel workflows but diverge significantly in their approach, feature set, and user feedback. With Preno boasting more recent reviews, higher ratings, and a proven track record in customer support, the clear choice seems to lean toward Preno for most hoteliers. But what exactly sets them apart?
Beds24, founded in 2006, positions itself as an all-in-one platform for a broad array of property types, including vacation rentals, hostels, and boutique hotels. It offers a comprehensive suite of 20 shared features and an additional 12 unique features, such as guest messaging, multi-lingual support, and online check-in, aiming to centralize operations. However, its overall rating is 0/5, and review data is nonexistent, signaling limited recent customer feedback.
In contrast, Preno, established in 2015, targets traditional hoteliers with a simplified, cloud-based approach. It has amassed 58 recent reviews, boasting a 4.86/5 ease of use score and a 4.69/5 customer support rating. The difference in review volume and recency is stark: Preno’s active user base provides more trustworthy insights into its performance. Given this, your team might lean toward Preno’s proven track record, but does it meet your specific operational needs?
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, Preno is the clear pick. Its high review count and recent feedback confirm that staff find it intuitive, with a user-friendly interface rated 4.86/5 and excellent support rated 4.69/5, making it suitable for teams with limited technical expertise.
Conversely, if your property requires extensive customization, multiple integrations, or features like gift vouchers, multi-lingual support, or mobile apps, Beds24 might appeal—though its current lack of recent reviews makes this a less reliable choice. For most hotels seeking a straightforward, reliable management tool, Preno remains the more trustworthy option.
Preno’s interface receives near-perfect ratings, with a 4.86/5 ease of use score based on recent reviews. Users highlight how quickly staff can learn and adopt the system, citing its intuitive layout and accessible design. Staff onboarding is described as smooth, with many noting how the software reduces training time.
Beds24, however, scores a 0/5 rating for ease of use—likely due to its complex, legacy interface and limited recent feedback, which makes it difficult to assess real-world usability. The lack of recent reviews suggests it may not be as straightforward for your team to adopt.
Edge: Preno
Beds24 offers 20 shared features plus 12 unique to its platform, including guest messaging, online check-in, gift vouchers, and multi-lingual support. These features cater to properties needing extensive customization and automation, especially for vacation rentals and hostels.
Preno provides 20 shared features and 9 unique ones, such as automated night audits, native email marketing, a guest CRM, and group functionality. It emphasizes operational automation, billing, and seamless integration with tools like Xero, making daily management more straightforward.
While Beds24 boasts a broader feature set, Preno’s features are more tailored to hotel operations, emphasizing automation and guest management. For most hoteliers, Preno’s focused feature set offers more practical value.
Edge: Beds24 (slightly, due to additional features)
Preno’s customer support scores a high 4.69/5, with reviews praising its quick, responsive service and helpful staff. Users describe Preno’s support as reliable, with ongoing assistance that eases the transition and daily operation.
Beds24, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Its lack of current customer feedback suggests it may not be as attentive or responsive as Preno.
Edge: Preno
Beds24 connects with 19 verified partners, including major booking platforms and channel managers like Tripadvisor, Booking.com, Vrbo, and Expedia. Its broad integration network supports diverse property types and distribution channels, making it a flexible choice for multi-channel operations.
Preno integrates with 17 partners, notably Xero, TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Revinate. Its focus on financial and reputation management tools aligns well with hotels seeking streamlined accounting and guest feedback.
While Beds24’s wider array of integrations may appeal to vacation rental managers, Preno’s strong partnerships with essential hotel tools make it more practical for traditional hoteliers.
Edge: Beds24
Preno’s recent reviews underscore its high user satisfaction, with a 9.48/10 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers praise its simplicity, support, and efficiency, especially for boutique and motels, with many comments about how it improves operational flow.
Beds24, lacking recent reviews and ratings, cannot be assessed reliably. Its outdated or incomplete feedback suggests it is not currently favored by hoteliers.
Edge: Preno
Beds24 charges a flat monthly fee of $100, with no free tier or trial mentioned. Its pricing structure may be suitable for small properties but offers limited flexibility.
Preno’s rate is $600/month, reflecting its more comprehensive, hotel-specific feature set. Its pricing might seem high but includes more tailored tools and dedicated support, making it a better value for hotels seeking reliability and ease.
At its core, Beds24 offers a broad, highly customizable platform suited for diverse property types and complex workflows. However, its limited recent user feedback diminishes confidence in its current performance and support quality.
Preno provides a streamlined, hotel-focused system with a proven track record, high user satisfaction, and active customer support. Its ease of use, automation features, and recent reviews make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
If your hotel values simplicity, quick onboarding, and strong support, Preno is the clear winner. Conversely, if you need extensive customization or manage vacation rentals and hostels, Beds24 might be worth considering, but with caution due to the lack of recent feedback.
In conclusion, for the majority of traditional hoteliers seeking dependable, easy-to-use software with active support, Preno stands out as the more suitable choice.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,... Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,从而加快了运营速度。
客户普遍看重 Preno 的响应式客户支持,实时聊天和全面的帮助资源被强调是其一大优势。不过,一些评论提到需要更持续的全天候服务。
用户经常提到 Preno 的自动化功能,该功能简化了开票和报告等管理任务。这种自动化功能可节省大量时间并减少人工错误,使员工能够更加专注于客人体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管反馈积极,但用户指出仍有改进空间。建议的改进包括高级报告、更好的移动应用功能和增强的客户互动工具。这些更新被视为满足不断变化的行业需求的必要条件。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Beds24 和 Preno HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Beds24 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno HMS 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Beds24:否。Preno HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Beds24 的 HT Score 为 0,Preno 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问