The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 276 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Betterspace GmbH 表现出色 在 平板电脑功能 方面 .
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 易用性和宾客体验 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Guest Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 276 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 82 | 194 |
在分析了 276 条经验证的评价后,Betterspace GmbH 用户最看重其 平板电脑功能, 宾客沟通, 能源管理,而 Crave Interactive 用户则强调 易用性和宾客体验, 支持与维护, 信息管理效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
平板电脑功能
▾
|
+
易用性和宾客体验
▾
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
+
支持与维护
▾
|
|
+
能源管理
▾
|
+
信息管理效率
▾
|
|
+
无纸化宾客名录
▾
|
+
定制和品牌推广
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持和客户服务
▾
|
−
平板电脑的功能和设计
▾
|
|
−
硬件耐用性
▾
|
−
整合与全渠道营销
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客房平板电脑 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 42 条评价 | #4 30 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 28 条评价 | #2 62 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #1 75 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 2 条评价 | #1 16 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | #2 85 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #2 156 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #2 49 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #7 0 条评价 | #4 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 0 条评价 | #2 92 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 79 条评价 | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #9 1 条评价 | #2 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 8 条评价 |
Choosing between Betterspace GmbH’s better.tab and Crave Interactive’s Tablets hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to enhance guest experience through in-room digital solutions, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and customer feedback. Betterspace emphasizes energy management and a strong European footprint, while Crave focuses on guest engagement and operational efficiency across a broader global market. Which aligns best with your goals?
If your hotel prioritizes energy efficiency, seamless PMS integration, and sustainability, better.tab is the clear choice. Its core strength lies in reducing costs through automated energy control and replacing paper directories, making it ideal for eco-conscious properties that want to streamline operations.
On the other hand, if your hotel values guest interaction, upselling, and a versatile digital experience, Crave’s tablets are more fitting. Its extensive feature set—including hotel directory, multi-lingual support, payments, and local recommendations—serves hotels seeking to boost guest satisfaction and revenue through digital channels.
In terms of market focus, better.tab has a stronger presence among European boutique and city hotels, with a high overall rating and recent reviews, while Crave’s larger review count and broader geographic footprint suggest a more mature and widely tested solution. Which of these priorities aligns with your hotel’s strategic direction?
Betterspace’s better.tab earns a higher ease of use rating at 4.59/5 compared to Crave’s 4.5/5, reflecting its straightforward PMS integration and user-friendly digital guest directory interface. Users praise its simple onboarding process and intuitive management system, with some mentions of speed improvements needed.
Crave’s tablets are also rated highly for usability, especially for staff and guests, thanks to their sleek design and reliable functionality. However, some users report challenges in content updating due to the complex online interface, impacting quick content changes.
Edge: better.tab.
Crave’s in-room tablets offer a significantly broader range of features—26 exclusive to its platform—including hotel directory, multi-lingual support, payments, room service ordering, guest messaging, and contactless ordering. This suite enables guests to handle many services independently, boosting operational efficiency and revenue.
Betterspace’s better.tab currently offers no unique features beyond its core digital guest directory and energy management, focusing primarily on sustainability and PMS integration. Its functionality is more streamlined, but with fewer digital service options.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Both products receive excellent customer support ratings—betterspace at 4.62/5 and Crave at 4.6/5—indicating responsive service. Betterspace users highlight its helpful, prompt assistance, though some note room for faster response times in support queries.
Crave’s support team is praised for their diligence and quick responses during setup and ongoing operations. Users value the proactive communication, which minimizes downtime and operational hiccups.
Edge: better.tab.
Betterspace boasts 27 verified integrations, including key partners like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, protel, and Mews, covering a wide range of property management and other hotel systems. This extensive list offers more flexibility for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Crave has 17 verified integrations, including major players like Amadeus, InfoGenesis, and ALICE, but with fewer partner options overall. Its integrations are focused mainly on operational and revenue management.
Edge: better.space GmbH.
Betterspace’s better.tab has a higher average rating of 4.84/5 from 58 reviews, with recent feedback indicating strong satisfaction, especially among boutique and city hotels. Its most recent reviews are from six months ago, but overall, it maintains a high reputation.
Crave’s rated slightly lower at 4.6/5 from 147 reviews, though it has a more extensive review base, including recent feedback. It’s particularly favored by luxury and resort hotels, which appreciate its guest engagement features.
Edge: better.tab.
better.tab does not publicly list its pricing, suggesting a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. Crave’s in-room tablets start at $1,200 with no ongoing monthly fees, but costs can vary depending on features and deployment scale.
Pricing transparency favors Crave, but the lack of publicly available quotes for better.tab means your hotel will need direct engagement to evaluate total costs.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive guest-facing features like room service ordering or multilingual content.
Not ideal if your focus is primarily on energy savings or sustainability; Crave does not emphasize these areas.
The core difference lies in their focus: better.space prioritizes energy management and sustainability, while Crave emphasizes guest engagement and operational efficiency. If your hotel needs to cut costs and promote eco-friendliness, better.tab offers clear advantages.
Choose better.tab if your goals include energy savings, replacing paper directories, and a high satisfaction score among European boutique hotels. It also benefits properties seeking PMS integration without extensive guest-facing features.
Opt for Crave if your hotel aims to increase revenue through upselling, improve guest digital interaction, and deploy a feature-rich platform that supports diverse services. Its broader feature set and global presence make it suitable for hotels wanting a comprehensive in-room digital solution.
In conclusion, your decision should match your hotel’s strategic priorities: cost efficiency and sustainability or guest experience and revenue growth. Both products excel in their respective niches, but based on recent reviews and market presence, better.space’s better.tab offers a more tested, highly rated solution for hotels seeking simplicity and energy savings.
酒店客房平板电脑 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,better.tab (by Betterspace) 和 Crave Interactive (Tablets) 共享 29 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 酒店目录 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 14 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the past, guests had to put notes on the door if they wanted to order breakfast in their room the next morning. Then a member of staff had to collect the slips at night and then..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"By using the Betterspace solutions, we have definitely been able to improve our processes in the area of guest communication and guest information. We no longer use printed brochur..."
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
平板电脑提供各种功能,如数字宾客目录、电话和订购服务。然而,平板电脑的速度、电话功能偶尔出现的故障以及配置设置的复杂性等问题凸显出来。
平板电脑的聊天功能可让客人和接待处直接发送消息,从而简化请求并加快服务交付。此功能可提高客人满意度和运营效率。但是,一些用户指出,需要更好的通话功能和... 平板电脑的聊天功能可让客人和接待处直接发送消息,从而简化请求并加快服务交付。此功能可提高客人满意度和运营效率。但是,一些用户指出,需要更好的通话功能和界面改进,以方便使用。
Betterspace 与 PMS 集成,可根据房间占用情况自动控制供暖,从而显著节省能源。评论强调,短期预订或取消预订无需人工干预,从而降低了成本。一些用户寻求更快... Betterspace 与 PMS 集成,可根据房间占用情况自动控制供暖,从而显著节省能源。评论强调,短期预订或取消预订无需人工干预,从而降低了成本。一些用户寻求更快的系统性能和浴室防溅恒温器。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
支持质量和响应时间的反馈褒贬不一。虽然许多人称赞了乐于助人且及时的客户服务,但一些评论也建议在支持响应的速度和效率方面有所改进。
多篇评论提到了对平板电脑和恒温器的物理耐用性的担忧。用户报告了充电站、平板电脑速度和塑料部件寿命方面的问题,这表明需要更强大的硬件解决方案。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
宾客发现Crave平板电脑操作简便,能够更便捷地获取酒店服务和信息,从而提升整体宾客体验。直观的设计使交互流畅无缝,赢得了宾客的积极反馈,并提高了满意度。
Crave 的支持团队以其快速响应和高效运作而备受赞誉,他们在设置和持续运营过程中提供了尽职尽责的协助。这确保了酒店员工和客人都能获得流畅的使用体验。
平板电脑能够高效地集中信息,让客人全面访问酒店资源。虽然它们简化了沟通并减少了资源浪费,但其后端系统仍需改进,以增强其自动更新能力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户欣赏其现代化的设计和可靠的功能;然而,缺少睡眠模式和夜间偶尔随机激活被认为是缺点,影响了客人的舒适度。
对高级集成(例如与其他设备或渠道连接以用于营销目的)的需求是一个显著的主题。改进建议包括将平板电脑与电视连接,以及允许个性化的客户信息推送策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。better.tab (by Betterspace) 和 Crave Interactive (Tablets) 共享许多核心 In-Room Hotel Tablets 功能,但各有独特的能力。better.tab (by Betterspace) 提供 27 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Crave Interactive (Tablets) 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。better.tab (by Betterspace) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
better.tab (by Betterspace):否。Crave Interactive (Tablets):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 In-Room Hotel Tablets 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Betterspace GmbH 的 HT Score 为 73,Crave Interactive 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问