The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 183 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Betterspace GmbH 表现出色 在 平板电脑功能 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Marketing.
Volo 表现出色 在 ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest messaging.
基于 HTR 上 183 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 82 | 101 |
在分析了 183 条经验证的评价后,Betterspace GmbH 用户最看重其 平板电脑功能, 宾客沟通, 能源管理,而 Volo 用户则强调 宾客互动和满意度, 客户支持响应能力, 客房内平板电脑功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
平板电脑功能
▾
|
+
宾客互动和满意度
▾
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
+
客户支持响应能力
▾
|
|
+
能源管理
▾
|
+
客房内平板电脑功能
▾
|
|
+
无纸化宾客名录
▾
|
+
定制与集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持和客户服务
▾
|
−
连接和技术问题
▾
|
|
−
硬件耐用性
▾
|
−
为老年客人提供的适应措施
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客房平板电脑 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 42 条评价 | #3 37 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 28 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #5 2 条评价 | #8 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | #3 66 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #3 47 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #3 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #7 0 条评价 | #2 20 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 0 条评价 | #1 96 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 79 条评价 | #8 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #9 1 条评价 | #8 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right in-room hotel tablet depends on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both Betterspace GmbH’s better.tab and Volo aim to elevate guest experiences and streamline operations, but they diverge in features, user feedback, and market reach. Betterspace’s strength lies in its deep integration with property management systems and energy management capabilities, while Volo shines in guest engagement, upselling, and ease of use. Which of these aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Both better.tab and Volo address guest interaction and operational efficiency by offering in-room touchscreen solutions, but they serve different core purposes. Betterspace’s better.tab emphasizes digital guest directories, energy management, and integrated hotel information, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational cost savings and eco-friendly options. Volo focuses on guest engagement, upselling, and service recovery, providing a platform that drives revenue and enhances the guest experience.
The key difference is their recent review volume and data recency. Volo has 78 reviews, with 11 reviews in the last six months, indicating more current and reliable insights. Betterspace, with only 58 reviews and none in the recent half-year, offers less current feedback. This makes Volo’s user experiences more reflective of recent performance, giving it a decisive edge for hoteliers prioritizing current support and satisfaction.
Would your hotel benefit more from operational savings and sustainability (better.tab), or guest engagement and revenue growth (Volo)? Both products excel in their niches but are optimized for different hotel types and priorities.
If your hotel aims to increase guest satisfaction while boosting ancillary revenue, Volo is the clear choice. Its features like in-room dining ordering, guest messaging, and personalized promotions have received glowing reviews, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and a 4.89/5 overall rating based on 78 reviews. Volo’s focus on real-time service recovery and upselling makes it ideal for boutique hotels, resorts, and branded properties focused on revenue.
Conversely, if your team prioritizes operational efficiency, sustainability, and cost reduction, better.tab offers compelling advantages. Its seamless PMS integration, energy management capabilities, and paperless directories are praised by users. Its NPS score of 9.17/10 and 58 reviews, though less recent, reflect solid satisfaction, especially among hotels seeking to modernize and reduce environmental impact.
In summary, choose Volo for guest engagement and revenue, and better.tab for operational savings and sustainability. Your hotel’s strategic goals should guide your final decision.
Volo scores higher in ease of use, with a 4.85/5 rating compared to better.tab’s 4.59/5. Based on reviews, Volo’s intuitive interface requires minimal staff training, and its guest-facing design is straightforward, making onboarding smoother. Its customer support is also highly responsive, with users noting quick issue resolution and proactive assistance.
Betterspace’s better.tab has a solid usability score but receives some feedback about tablet speed and hardware durability concerns, which can hinder staff adoption. Its onboarding is rated at 4.62/5, but some users mention that backend customization can be complex.
Edge: Volo.
Volo offers 10 unique features not found in better.tab, including late checkout, in-room dining ordering, bell services, guest messaging, spa & wellness modules, multi-currency, and video concierge. These features directly enhance guest satisfaction and operational revenue, especially for properties emphasizing amenities and personalized services.
Betterspace has 6 exclusive features, such as bedside alarms, sponsorship opportunities, TV & room controls, bill viewing, express check-out, and multi-lingual support. These are valuable for operational control, upselling, and multilingual communication but are less focused on guest engagement.
Both share 23 features, but Volo’s additional functionalities geared toward guest interaction and revenue are more comprehensive.
Edge: Volo.
Volo’s customer support scores a 4.89/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness, proactive troubleshooting, and dedicated account team. Many highlight Volo’s prompt issue resolution, often noting that support is available 24/7, which minimizes guest disruptions.
Betterspace’s support scores 4.62/5, with some reviews indicating good responsiveness but others mentioning room for faster, more proactive responses. Some users report delays in backend improvements and hardware issues that could be better addressed.
Edge: Volo.
Betterspace boasts 27 verified integrations, including key PMS and channel management systems like 4SUITES, hotelkit, apaleo GmbH, and TrustYou. These extensive partnerships facilitate seamless operational workflows and data sharing.
Volo has 22 verified partners, including WebRezPro, Stayntouch, SiteMinder, and Maestro PMS. While slightly fewer, these integrations cover most major systems, and Volo’s flexible API allows tailored connections.
For broader system compatibility, better.space holds a slight edge, but Volo’s integrations are sufficient for most hotel environments.
Edge: Betterspace GmbH.
Volo’s recent reviews show a higher overall rating of 4.89/5, with a 97% likelihood to recommend, based on 78 reviews, including 11 recent ones. Hoteliers praise its user-friendly interface, responsiveness, and guest engagement features.
Betterspace’s better.tab scores 4.84/5 on overall ratings, with an 89% likelihood to recommend from 58 reviews, but with no recent feedback in the last six months. Its users appreciate integration and energy management but note hardware durability issues.
For current satisfaction, Volo has the clear edge.
Volo charges a flat $1,200 monthly fee with no implementation or setup costs, but specific pricing for larger deployments may vary. better.tab’s pricing details are not publicly available, which could indicate custom quotes or higher overall costs, especially since no freemium or trial options are listed.
Given the transparent pricing and monthly flat fee, Volo offers a predictable cost structure, while better.tab’s pricing may require direct negotiation.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily relies on high guest engagement, entertainment, or upselling, as better.tab’s feature set is more operationally focused.
Not ideal if your hotel’s main goal is operational cost savings, energy management, or sustainability without a strong emphasis on guest engagement.
Betterspace’s better.tab is best suited for hotels that want to modernize operations, reduce costs, and promote eco-friendly practices. Its integration with PMS and energy management capabilities make it attractive for properties looking to improve operational efficiency.
Volo excels in guest engagement, upselling, and service recovery, making it ideal for hotels that prioritize guest satisfaction and revenue growth. Its ease of use, broad feature set, and recent high ratings make it the recommended choice for most hoteliers today.
If your focus is on innovative guest experiences and revenue, Volo is the superior pick. But if operational efficiency and sustainability are your priorities, better.tab offers a compelling solution.
酒店客房平板电脑 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,better.tab (by Betterspace) 和 Volo 共享 23 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客户营销 | ||
| 客房内点餐 | ||
| 床边报警器 | ||
| 延迟退房 | ||
| 数字礼宾 | ||
| 新闻和天气 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 查看账单和快速结帐 | ||
| 电视和房间控制 | ||
| 贝尔服务 | ||
| 赞助机会 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the past, guests had to put notes on the door if they wanted to order breakfast in their room the next morning. Then a member of staff had to collect the slips at night and then..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"By using the Betterspace solutions, we have definitely been able to improve our processes in the area of guest communication and guest information. We no longer use printed brochur..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
平板电脑提供各种功能,如数字宾客目录、电话和订购服务。然而,平板电脑的速度、电话功能偶尔出现的故障以及配置设置的复杂性等问题凸显出来。
平板电脑的聊天功能可让客人和接待处直接发送消息,从而简化请求并加快服务交付。此功能可提高客人满意度和运营效率。但是,一些用户指出,需要更好的通话功能和... 平板电脑的聊天功能可让客人和接待处直接发送消息,从而简化请求并加快服务交付。此功能可提高客人满意度和运营效率。但是,一些用户指出,需要更好的通话功能和界面改进,以方便使用。
Betterspace 与 PMS 集成,可根据房间占用情况自动控制供暖,从而显著节省能源。评论强调,短期预订或取消预订无需人工干预,从而降低了成本。一些用户寻求更快... Betterspace 与 PMS 集成,可根据房间占用情况自动控制供暖,从而显著节省能源。评论强调,短期预订或取消预订无需人工干预,从而降低了成本。一些用户寻求更快的系统性能和浴室防溅恒温器。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
支持质量和响应时间的反馈褒贬不一。虽然许多人称赞了乐于助人且及时的客户服务,但一些评论也建议在支持响应的速度和效率方面有所改进。
多篇评论提到了对平板电脑和恒温器的物理耐用性的担忧。用户报告了充电站、平板电脑速度和塑料部件寿命方面的问题,这表明需要更强大的硬件解决方案。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
大多数用户表示,Volo 显著提高了客人的互动和满意度。无需工作人员直接干预,即可自定义平板电脑进行娱乐和交流的功能受到高度赞扬,有助于打造个性化和高效的... 大多数用户表示,Volo 显著提高了客人的互动和满意度。无需工作人员直接干预,即可自定义平板电脑进行娱乐和交流的功能受到高度赞扬,有助于打造个性化和高效的客人体验。
虽然客户支持是一项通用功能,但 Volo 对查询的快速响应和主动解决问题的能力经常受到称赞。评论者指出,无需酒店 IT 人员参与即可快速解决问题是一大卖点。
评论者不断提及 Volo 客房内平板电脑的多功能性和便利性,并强调其允许客人订购食物、请求服务和获取当地信息的功能。此功能通过提供与传统酒店通信方法不同的现... 评论者不断提及 Volo 客房内平板电脑的多功能性和便利性,并强调其允许客人订购食物、请求服务和获取当地信息的功能。此功能通过提供与传统酒店通信方法不同的现代互动方式来提升客人体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
有些评论提到偶尔会出现技术问题,例如连接问题或错过请求。尽管存在这些挑战,但大多数人都强调 Volo 能够快速解决问题,保持高服务标准。
一些评论提到了老年客人在适应科技方面面临的挑战。评论中提到了关于更大文本选项或音频辅助等功能的建议,指出了可以改进的地方,以提高老年人的可访问性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。better.tab (by Betterspace) 和 Volo 共享许多核心 In-Room Hotel Tablets 功能,但各有独特的能力。better.tab (by Betterspace) 提供 27 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Volo 提供 22 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Volo 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
better.tab (by Betterspace):否。Volo:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 In-Room Hotel Tablets 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Betterspace GmbH 的 HT Score 为 73,Volo 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问