The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 82 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Betterspace GmbH 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping requests and Guest Feedback Module (comment cards/reviews).
Quadriga (IQ In-Room) 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 82 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 82 | 0 |
在分析了 82 条经验证的评价后,Betterspace GmbH 用户最看重其 平板电脑功能, 宾客沟通, 能源管理,而 Quadriga (IQ In-Room) 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
平板电脑功能
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
能源管理
▾
|
|
|
+
无纸化宾客名录
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持和客户服务
▾
|
|
|
−
硬件耐用性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客房平板电脑 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 42 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 28 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #5 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #7 0 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #12 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 79 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #9 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Betterspace GmbH’s better.tab and Quadriga’s IQ In-Room hinges on your hotel’s priorities. Both aim to enhance in-room guest experiences, but their core functionalities and target audiences diverge significantly. Betterspace’s offering centers on digital guest directories, energy management, and operational tools, while Quadriga focuses on guest entertainment, connectivity, and revenue-generating services. Which aligns more with your hotel’s strategic goals?
Betterspace GmbH’s better.tab is a comprehensive digital guest directory and management system, offering features like room controls, guest communication, and energy savings integrations. Quadriga’s IQ In-Room provides entertainment, internet, and content delivery solutions designed to keep guests connected and entertained. The key difference: better.tab emphasizes operational efficiency and sustainability, while Quadriga prioritizes guest engagement and revenue.
Both products aim to elevate the guest experience, but their primary problems they solve differ. Betterspace concentrates on reducing costs and streamlining communication through digital directories and energy controls, whereas Quadriga enhances in-room entertainment and internet connectivity to boost guest satisfaction. Do you need operational tools or entertainment features? That’s the central question.
If your hotel needs to reduce operational costs while offering modern, digital guest communication, go with Betterspace. Its suite of features—like PMS integration, energy management, and digital directories—makes it a suitable fit for hotels aiming for efficiency and sustainability.
If your team prioritizes guest entertainment, high-speed internet, and upselling services, Quadriga is the better choice. Its focus on connected entertainment solutions and revenue opportunities appeals to hotels seeking to differentiate their in-room offerings. For properties that want a digital concierge combined with guest engagement tools, Quadriga is the more fitting option.
Betterspace GmbH’s better.tab has a high user rating of 4.59/5 for ease of use, supported by positive reviews highlighting straightforward onboarding and intuitive interfaces. Customers praise its seamless PMS integration and simple management tools, making staff adoption easier.
Quadriga’s IQ In-Room lacks publicly available ratings and recent reviews, which makes it difficult to assess usability or customer satisfaction. Given the data, better.space’s clear focus on user-friendly interfaces provides a distinct advantage for hotels prioritizing staff and guest ease of use.
Edge: better.tab.
Betterspace GmbH’s better.tab offers 29 unique features, including digital directories, room controls, guest messaging, local guides, and in-room ordering—covering operational and guest engagement needs. Its features support energy management, upselling, and sustainability, offering a comprehensive digital environment tailored for hotels.
Quadriga’s IQ In-Room provides entertainment, internet, and connectivity services but does not seem to offer as broad a feature set. Its focus is on entertainment and network solutions, with no mention of digital directories, guest communication, or operational tools. For hotels seeking a feature-rich management platform, better.tab’s extensive capabilities give it a clear edge.
Edge: better.space.
Betterspace GmbH’s customer support is rated 4.62/5, with reviewers praising its helpfulness and responsiveness. Many mention that issues are resolved quickly, though some note room for improvement in speed and complexity of backend customization.
Quadriga’s support ratings and reviews are not available, limiting direct comparison. Without recent feedback, it’s safer to favor the product with documented support quality. Given this, betterspace’s consistently high ratings and positive reviews provide a stronger indication of reliable support.
Edge: better.tab.
Betterspace GmbH integrates with 27 verified partners, including PMS systems like protel, hotelkit, and Oracle Hospitality, as well as third-party services like TrustYou and Winhotel. Its extensive integration network allows for a seamless experience across operational tools.
Quadriga’s IQ In-Room offers no publicly listed integrations, which limits its ability to connect with existing hotel systems. For hotels requiring a versatile, integrated platform, better.space’s partnership network is a significant advantage.
Edge: better.tab.
Betterspace GmbH’s better.tab has a strong overall rating of 4.84/5 based on 58 reviews, with recent feedback supporting its ease of use, support, and feature richness. Its reviews are primarily from European hotels across various segments, with a notable 89% likelihood to recommend.
Quadriga (IQ In-Room) lacks available reviews, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction or property ratings. Given the current data, betterspace’s high review count and recent positive feedback make it the preferred choice.
Edge: better.tab.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing models, but the absence of information indicates they are custom-quoted, likely based on hotel size and feature requirements. Betterspace does not offer a freemium or trial, suggesting a more tailored, possibly premium pricing approach.
Quadriga’s pricing details are also unavailable, but its focus on enterprise-level entertainment solutions suggests a potentially higher investment. For transparent budgeting, better.space’s clear absence of trial options may be a consideration, but both likely require direct contact for quotes.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs entertainment or advanced internet connectivity without operational management.
Not ideal if your main focus is operational efficiency, energy management, or digital guest directories.
Betterspace GmbH’s better.tab and Quadriga serve different needs within the hotel industry. If your priorities are reducing costs, streamlining communication, and supporting sustainability, better.tab’s feature-rich, integrated platform makes it the clear choice, especially given its strong recent reviews and wide adoption.
Quadriga’s IQ In-Room, meanwhile, is best suited for hotels aiming to enhance guest entertainment, internet connectivity, and revenue through multimedia services. Its limited public support data and lack of recent reviews make it less compelling for hotels seeking proven, well-rated solutions.
For most hotels evaluating both, better.space’s extensive features, higher user ratings, and active support ecosystem position it as the more reliable, versatile choice. However, if guest entertainment and high-speed connectivity are your top focus, Quadriga remains a notable option, albeit with limited publicly available feedback.
酒店客房平板电脑 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,better.tab (by Betterspace) 和 Quadriga (IQ In-Room) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 团体和会议产品 | ||
| 安全的网页浏览 | ||
| 床边报警器 | ||
| 当地城市指南 | ||
| 数字目录 | ||
| 数字菜单 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the past, guests had to put notes on the door if they wanted to order breakfast in their room the next morning. Then a member of staff had to collect the slips at night and then..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"By using the Betterspace solutions, we have definitely been able to improve our processes in the area of guest communication and guest information. We no longer use printed brochur..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
平板电脑提供各种功能,如数字宾客目录、电话和订购服务。然而,平板电脑的速度、电话功能偶尔出现的故障以及配置设置的复杂性等问题凸显出来。
平板电脑的聊天功能可让客人和接待处直接发送消息,从而简化请求并加快服务交付。此功能可提高客人满意度和运营效率。但是,一些用户指出,需要更好的通话功能和... 平板电脑的聊天功能可让客人和接待处直接发送消息,从而简化请求并加快服务交付。此功能可提高客人满意度和运营效率。但是,一些用户指出,需要更好的通话功能和界面改进,以方便使用。
Betterspace 与 PMS 集成,可根据房间占用情况自动控制供暖,从而显著节省能源。评论强调,短期预订或取消预订无需人工干预,从而降低了成本。一些用户寻求更快... Betterspace 与 PMS 集成,可根据房间占用情况自动控制供暖,从而显著节省能源。评论强调,短期预订或取消预订无需人工干预,从而降低了成本。一些用户寻求更快的系统性能和浴室防溅恒温器。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
支持质量和响应时间的反馈褒贬不一。虽然许多人称赞了乐于助人且及时的客户服务,但一些评论也建议在支持响应的速度和效率方面有所改进。
多篇评论提到了对平板电脑和恒温器的物理耐用性的担忧。用户报告了充电站、平板电脑速度和塑料部件寿命方面的问题,这表明需要更强大的硬件解决方案。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。better.tab (by Betterspace) 和 Quadriga (IQ In-Room) 共享许多核心 In-Room Hotel Tablets 功能,但各有独特的能力。better.tab (by Betterspace) 提供 27 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quadriga (IQ In-Room) 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。better.tab (by Betterspace) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
better.tab (by Betterspace):否。Quadriga (IQ In-Room):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 In-Room Hotel Tablets 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Betterspace GmbH 的 HT Score 为 73,Quadriga (IQ In-Room) 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问