The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 77 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Blastness 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Reporting Dashboard.
FelhőMatrac 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 77 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 77 | 0 |
在分析了 77 条经验证的评价后,Blastness 用户最看重其 专业协助与支持, 数据可访问性和灵活性, 无缝系统集成,而 FelhőMatrac 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
专业协助与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
数据可访问性和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
+
收益管理工具
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
界面直观性问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 29 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 42 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #13 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 32 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 19 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #5 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #12 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 76 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #8 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Blastness CRS and FelhőMatrac hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, resources, and strategic goals. Both products aim to streamline reservation management, but Blastness offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a strong market presence, while FelhőMatrac appears less developed with no recent reviews or detailed features. Given the current available data, Blastness is the more compelling option for hoteliers seeking proven technology and ongoing support.
Both Blastness CRS and FelhőMatrac are designed to improve reservation management and revenue optimization, addressing common hotel challenges like overbooking, rate inconsistencies, and distribution inefficiencies. However, Blastness’s high rating, large review base, and recent user feedback demonstrate a mature, well-supported system, whereas FelhőMatrac has no recent reviews or detailed feature set, limiting confidence in its capabilities.
Blastness’s strengths lie in its integrations, user-friendly booking engine, and advanced revenue management tools, which are absent in FelhőMatrac. Hoteliers need to ask, do I want a proven, feature-laden platform with extensive support, or am I willing to consider a less transparent, untested alternative?
If your hotel needs a reliable, tested reservation system with broad integrations and robust revenue tools, go with Blastness. Its 72 reviews, a 4.9/5 customer support rating, and recent positive feedback make it a safe choice for properties of various sizes, especially those aiming to maximize direct bookings and streamline operations.
If your hotel is a small or emerging property with minimal current needs and you’re willing to gamble on an unreviewed product, FelhőMatrac might be worth exploring, though its lack of recent data raises concerns about support and functionality. For most hotels, Blastness’s proven track record makes it the preferred option.
Blastness boasts a 4.89/5 ease of use rating, with most users praising its intuitive booking engine, channel management, and straightforward interface. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.94/5, reflecting high satisfaction among new users, and reviews mention responsive, professional support that simplifies staff adoption.
FelhőMatrac provides no recent user feedback or ratings, making it impossible to assess its user experience. Given the extensive positive reviews of Blastness, the edge clearly goes to Blastness for user-friendliness.
Blastness offers 18 unique features, including RMS connectivity, PMS integration, metasearch support, geotargeted pricing, dynamic pricing, availability management, booking rules, cancellations, TMC management, mobile app, multi-property control, content management, reporting dashboards, and OTA distribution. These features are designed to give your team comprehensive control over revenue and distribution channels.
FelhőMatrac has no listed features or integrations, making it difficult to compare. Based on available data, Blastness’s extensive feature set clearly provides a competitive edge.
Blastness’s support ratings are exemplary, with a 4.9/5 rating and reviews highlighting professional, responsive assistance and ongoing training. Users describe the support team as helpful, emphasizing quick responses and clear communication, which reduces operational stress.
FelhőMatrac offers no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality uncertain. This lack of data tips the scales in favor of Blastness.
Blastness has verified partnerships with 15 providers, including Upsellguru, Oracle Hospitality, and various channel managers, offering seamless connectivity to OTAs, GDS, and other systems. These integrations simplify your hotel’s tech ecosystem and broaden distribution.
FelhőMatrac has no listed integrations or partners, limiting its compatibility and flexibility. The proven integration network makes Blastness the clear winner.
Blastness’s review score of 100/100 and 99% likelihood to recommend reflect overwhelmingly positive user experiences, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use, support, and effectiveness. Hotels across various segments, from luxury to city center properties, have expressed high satisfaction.
FelhőMatrac has no reviews or ratings to evaluate, so its user satisfaction remains unknown. Based on current data, Blastness’s higher ratings are indisputable.
Blastness charges a base fee of $600 per month, with no free tier or trial period, making it a predictable investment for hotels ready to commit. Its pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set and support.
FelhőMatrac provides no pricing information, which complicates budgeting and comparison. Given the transparency and proven value of Blastness, it offers clearer financial expectations.
Not ideal if you are a very small property with minimal booking channels or limited budget constraints, as the system’s depth might be more than you need.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive integrations, advanced revenue management, or proven user support.
Blastness CRS and FelhőMatrac serve different hotel segments and needs, but the current landscape favors Blastness due to its extensive reviews, recent user feedback, and richer feature set. Its high customer ratings and wide range of integrations make it a trusted choice for hotels seeking a dependable, all-in-one reservation platform.
If your hotel prioritizes proven technology, comprehensive features, and ongoing support, Blastness offers clear advantages. FelhőMatrac’s lack of recent data and limited features make it a less compelling candidate unless your hotel has very basic needs and is willing to test unverified solutions.
In conclusion, for most hotels ready to invest in a reservation system that scales with your business, Blastness CRS remains the more reliable and feature-rich option, backed by real user experiences and a strong market presence.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
FelhőMatrac | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Blastness CRS 和 FelhőMatrac 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| RMS 连接性 | ||
| 元搜索连接 | ||
| 动态定价 | ||
| 地理定位定价模块 | ||
| 支持每周和每月费率 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论称赞 Blastness 提供的专业和及时的帮助,强调了持续培训和对市场变化做出快速反应的重要性。
用户喜欢可以轻松访问全面的数据,以及灵活调整价格和设置,这有利于战略规划和调整。
用户报告称,Blastness 与现有系统集成良好,从而形成一个连贯的工作流程,没有技术故障或中断,从而提高了日常运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然总体上广受好评,但一些用户指出,Blastness 界面的某些部分可以更加直观,这将增强导航和用户体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Blastness CRS 和 FelhőMatrac 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Blastness CRS 提供 15 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 FelhőMatrac 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Blastness CRS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Blastness CRS:否。FelhőMatrac:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Blastness 的 HT Score 为 100,FelhőMatrac 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问