The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 351 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
BookingCenter 表现出色 .
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 351 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 351 |
在分析了 351 条经验证的评价后,BookingCenter 用户最看重其 ,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 technical support limitations, user-friendly interface, 宾客沟通。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Technical Support Limitations
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
自定义选项
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
日历功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 129 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #2 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #1 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #4 92 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 72 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #4 22 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #9 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 332 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #36 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #24 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #20 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can seem daunting, especially when comparing two offerings like BookingCenter and ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue, but they approach these goals differently. Your decision hinges on which features, ease of use, support, and pricing align best with your property's needs.
BookingCenter provides a long-standing, desktop-based PMS with integrated GDS and distribution, mainly serving independent properties and groups. ThinkReservations, meanwhile, offers a cloud-based, all-in-one system with more modern features and a broader regional footprint.
BookingCenter is a property management system that combines PMS and GDS functionalities, emphasizing global distribution and traditional property management. ThinkReservations, on the other hand, is an all-in-one cloud platform that consolidates booking, channel management, and guest communications into a single interface.
While BookingCenter aims to serve properties that need robust distribution and PMS tools, ThinkReservations is designed for hotels seeking simplicity, automation, and revenue-focused features. Which one fits your hotel’s operational style and growth ambitions?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, easy-to-learn system with a focus on guest communication, upselling, and online booking, go with ThinkReservations. Its recent reviews—312 in total with a 4.88/5 overall rating—show strong satisfaction, especially among B&Bs and boutique hotels.
Conversely, if your property requires a traditional PMS with GDS and extensive global distribution, BookingCenter’s offerings might appeal. However, its lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating in overall satisfaction suggest it’s less aligned with current hotel tech expectations.
Given the recent review volume and high ratings, ThinkReservations is the safer pick for most hotels today.
ThinkReservations scores 4.8/5 for ease of use, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training needs. Reviewers mention that its platform feels "like adding another employee" and highlight the helpfulness of its training materials.
BookingCenter, with a 0/5 usability rating and no recent reviews, offers no evidence of user-friendliness or modern interface design. Its desktop and web-based PMS may be outdated for many modern hoteliers needing agility.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations offers 43 distinct features, including a channel manager, property management system, booking engine, guest messaging, real-time reporting, automated night audit, digital check-in, revenue management, and more. These features are designed to boost efficiency and revenue, many of which are absent in BookingCenter.
BookingCenter, on the other hand, provides only its core property management and distribution functionalities without added modules or automation tools. Its feature set appears minimal compared to ThinkReservations’ extensive capabilities.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations boasts a 4.79/5 support rating, with reviews emphasizing quick, knowledgeable responses and accessible support staff. Users describe support as “fantastic” and “helpful,” contributing to smoother onboarding and ongoing operations.
BookingCenter, with a 0/5 support rating and no recent feedback, offers no recent evidence of support quality. Its lack of recent reviews suggests limited or outdated support services.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations integrates with 16 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Airbnb, and additional tools like TrustYou and Triptease. Its diverse integration options enable seamless channel management and guest engagement.
BookingCenter has only 2 verified partners, including Airbnb, and fewer integration options overall. Its limited partner list restricts connectivity to newer or more advanced third-party services.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations' recent reviews (8 in the last 6 months) consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, leading to a high NPS score of 9.66/10 and an overall rating of 4.88/5. Its user base includes a significant number of B&Bs, boutique hotels, and small independents, with reviews emphasizing revenue boosts and operational simplicity.
BookingCenter’s rating is 0/5 with no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its lack of recent feedback indicates it’s likely less favored among hoteliers today.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
BookingCenter does not publicly list its pricing, suggesting it may operate on a custom quote basis or have legacy pricing models. ThinkReservations charges $1,100 per month, with no mention of setup or additional fees.
Given the transparency and recent reviews, ThinkReservations offers clear pricing, whereas BookingCenter’s costs remain opaque.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks modern, cloud-based solutions, or prefers extensive automation and guest engagement tools.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced global distribution GDS or custom enterprise-level integrations.
BookingCenter offers a traditional, distribution-focused PMS with GDS capabilities, but it lacks recent reviews and current user feedback. ThinkReservations, by contrast, is a modern, cloud-based platform with over 300 recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and a comprehensive feature set.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, all-in-one management system that improves guest experiences and boosts revenue, ThinkReservations is the clear choice. Its recent popularity and strong ratings make it well-suited for independent properties looking to grow.
However, if your operations are heavily reliant on global distribution and legacy systems, BookingCenter may still fit your needs—but beware of limited support and outdated feedback.
In conclusion, for most independent hoteliers today, ThinkReservations provides a more relevant, user-friendly, and well-supported solution that can truly help your property thrive.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,BookingCenter 和 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 31 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
A few reviews suggested limitations in technical support, specifically mentioning non-24/7 availability and response delays. Users occasionally felt i... A few reviews suggested limitations in technical support, specifically mentioning non-24/7 availability and response delays. Users occasionally felt improvements could be made in this area for quicker resolutions.
The interface is intuitive and easy to navigate for staff and customers. This transparency ensures a smooth booking process and simplifies management... The interface is intuitive and easy to navigate for staff and customers. This transparency ensures a smooth booking process and simplifies management tasks, benefiting tech and non-tech-savvy users alike.
该平台支持自动消息传递、可自定义的电子邮件模板以及住客入住后的评论,从而提升宾客的参与度和满意度。它有效地促进了入住前、入住中和入住后的沟通。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
日历功能虽然强大,但缺乏连续滚动功能,有时会使长期规划变得复杂,并且需要输入日期才能导航。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。BookingCenter 和 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。BookingCenter 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
BookingCenter:否。ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。BookingCenter 的 HT Score 为 0,ThinkReservations 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案