项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,398 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 在易用性以及客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合赌场住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有收益管理模块以及交付过程等独家功能。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 694 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 222 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 48 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #15 3 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 562 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #4 242 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #6 126 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 100 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 468 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #7 175 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 340 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #7 12 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) significantly impacts your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Bookster by Bookster aims to streamline vacation rental management with guest insights and operational tools, but it has no reviews or measurable market presence, making it difficult to assess its true capabilities. In contrast, Cloudbeds PMS boasts over 1,071 reviews, including 81 recent ones within the last six months, highlighting its strong, current market confidence. With a 4.63/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend, Cloudbeds clearly outperforms in trustworthiness. Are you prepared to prioritize proven, reviewed solutions over untested options?
Bookster claims to optimize vacation rental management, focusing on guest reviews, analytics, and marketing. However, it lacks real-world validation, with no reviews or user feedback available. Cloudbeds, on the other hand, offers a full suite of features—including reservation management, channel management, revenue tools, and guest communication—that have been positively reviewed by thousands of hoteliers globally. Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, reliable support, and measurable growth, making it the more dependable choice. Do you want to rely on a product with a proven track record or one with no current evidence of effectiveness?
If your hotel operates as a vacation rental property or small boutique, and you need guest review insights plus basic management tools, Bookster's niche focus might seem appealing. Yet, with zero reviews and no recent market validation, its capabilities remain uncertain. Conversely, Cloudbeds suits a broad range of hotel types—from boutique to large resorts—thanks to its extensive feature set, user-friendly interface, and robust integrations. Its customer base includes over 1,000 properties, with many reporting increased direct bookings and operational efficiencies. For scalable growth and proven results, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Are you willing to take a chance on an unreviewed system or invest in a proven platform?
Bookster's interface and onboarding process are not publicly rated or reviewed, leaving its ease of use questionable. Cloudbeds earns a remarkable 4.61/5 from over a thousand reviews, with many users praising its intuitive design and quick setup—rating it one of the easiest platforms they’ve used. Its onboarding is generally rated at 4.45/5, with support staff often described as attentive and responsive. Review quotes like, "Cloudbeds is easy to use across multiple devices," reinforce its user-centric approach. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Bookster focuses on guest reviews, analytics, and marketing, offering limited features that are primarily suited to vacation rentals. Cloudbeds provides a comprehensive ecosystem with 64 features, including channel management, booking engine, revenue tools, automation, guest messaging, online check-in, and integrations with 190 verified partners. Notably, Cloudbeds’ features support scalability, automation, and revenue optimization, while Bookster's limited, niche features lack demonstrated breadth. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Bookster offers no publicly available support ratings or reviews, which raises concerns about service reliability. Cloudbeds, with a 4.41/5 support rating from over a thousand reviews, is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness, with comments like, "Support team is prompt and empathetic." Recent reviews cite quick issue resolution and ongoing assistance, which are critical for daily operations. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Bookster has zero verified integrations listed, limiting its potential for seamless operation within your hotel’s existing tech stack. Cloudbeds, with 190 verified partners, connects to major OTAs, payment processors, analytics tools, and property systems—enabling a unified management experience. Shared integrations include prominent channels like Booking.com and Expedia, with many unique options enhancing scalability. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Given the absence of reviews for Bookster, it cannot be reliably rated by hoteliers. Cloudbeds, however, boasts a 4.63/5 rating based on over 1,000 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, support, and revenue growth. Hotel segments such as boutique hotels and hostels rate Cloudbeds particularly highly, often citing improved operational efficiency. Its recent NPS score of 8.94/10 underscores strong user satisfaction. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Bookster's pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may not have a clear or scalable pricing model. Cloudbeds charges a base fee of $600 per month, with no additional implementation or setup costs, making it transparent and predictable for budget planning. Its pricing is aligned with its extensive feature set, offering value for properties seeking comprehensive management. If cost transparency is critical, Cloudbeds’s clear pricing model is advantageous.
Bookster appears to target vacation rentals with a focus on guest reviews and analytics, but its lack of reviews and proven market presence make it a risky choice. Cloudbeds, with over a thousand recent reviews, a high overall rating, and a broad feature set, is proven to improve operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Its extensive integrations and support make it a reliable platform for ambitious hotels looking to scale. For most hotels, Cloudbeds is the smarter, safer investment.
In conclusion, prioritize proven solutions with recent, positive user feedback. Cloudbeds’s proven track record and comprehensive capabilities make it the better choice for hotels ready to grow and modernize their operations.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个普遍的观点是,Cloudbeds 相对容易学习,界面清晰,适合技术能力有限的小型酒店或团队。一些评价者称赞其入门和培训资料,而另一些则表示设置过程可能较慢或... 一个普遍的观点是,Cloudbeds 相对容易学习,界面清晰,适合技术能力有限的小型酒店或团队。一些评价者称赞其入门和培训资料,而另一些则表示设置过程可能较慢或不完整,尤其是在初始实施阶段。
用户最常赞扬Cloudbeds的清晰日历视图,它使查看房态、移动预订、拆分住宿以及直观处理入住和变更变得简单。评论者表示,这减少了点击次数,加快了前台工作速度... 用户最常赞扬Cloudbeds的清晰日历视图,它使查看房态、移动预订、拆分住宿以及直观处理入住和变更变得简单。评论者表示,这减少了点击次数,加快了前台工作速度,并帮助员工一目了然地了解酒店情况。
用户经常提到Cloudbeds的报告功能对于集中查看绩效、入住率、收入和运营趋势非常有用。与此同时,许多用户希望获得更多的自定义选项、更快的下载速度,以及更现... 用户经常提到Cloudbeds的报告功能对于集中查看绩效、入住率、收入和运营趋势非常有用。与此同时,许多用户希望获得更多的自定义选项、更快的下载速度,以及更现代的仪表盘式可视化,而不是类似Excel的导出格式。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
支持是评价中的一个重要区分点,但许多用户希望能更快地联系到人工,减少聊天机器人带来的阻碍。有些用户赞扬快速且有帮助的聊天或实施支持,而另一些用户则希望... 支持是评价中的一个重要区分点,但许多用户希望能更快地联系到人工,减少聊天机器人带来的阻碍。有些用户赞扬快速且有帮助的聊天或实施支持,而另一些用户则希望针对紧急的前台问题能提供电话、视频或直接代理支持。
一个反复出现的主要问题是,移动应用常被视为只读或功能过于有限,无法进行实际操作。评论者多次希望能够直接在应用中创建和编辑预订、管理房间,并接收实时通知... 一个反复出现的主要问题是,移动应用常被视为只读或功能过于有限,无法进行实际操作。评论者多次希望能够直接在应用中创建和编辑预订、管理房间,并接收实时通知,而无需切换回网页浏览器或电子邮件。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bookster 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookster 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 206 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bookster:否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookster 的 HT Score 为 0,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐