项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 945 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Mews 在易用性以及客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合汽车旅馆住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有收益管理模块以及客户关系管理等独家功能。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 363 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 386 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 80 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 505 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 238 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 181 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 139 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 110 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 714 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to streamline operations, enhance guest experiences, and maximize revenue. Both Bookster and Mews PMS promise to address these challenges, but they do so with very different levels of maturity and scope. Bookster, with zero recent reviews and a limited presence, seems more like a niche or untested solution, whereas Mews offers a comprehensive, proven platform with over 750 recent reviews and a high user satisfaction rate. So, which product better fits your hotel’s needs?
Bookster aims to serve property managers in vacation rentals and small boutique hotels, focusing on guest reviews and analytics. Mews, on the other hand, supports a wide range of hotel types—from boutique to large chains—and is clearly more established in the market. Do you want to rely on a lesser-known system, or lean on a platform with a proven track record and extensive integrations?
Both products seek to simplify property management, but they diverge sharply in execution. Bookster is described as an intuitive platform tailored to vacation rentals, with features for guest communication and analytics, but it lacks recent review data to confirm ongoing support or feature updates. Mews, by contrast, is a cloud-native PMS with a broad feature set, over 336 verified integrations, and a 4.62/5 rating from 758 recent reviews, emphasizing automation and flexibility.
Mews also has a global presence in 54 countries and multiple awards, whereas Bookster’s regional footprint appears nonexistent. Would you trust a product with no recent customer feedback or one backed by thousands of hotel operators worldwide?
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-property system with extensive automation, integrations, and a proven track record, go with Mews. Its user-friendly interface and over 98% recommendation rate from recent reviews make it the clear choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
If your property is a small, independent vacation rental or boutique with a very limited scope and budget, and you’re comfortable with an untested platform, Bookster might suffice. However, given Mews’ superior ratings, reviews, and feature richness, it’s the more reliable choice for most hotels aiming for growth and resilience.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 in ease of use, supported by extensive positive reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training needs. Its onboarding score of 4.39/5 and detailed support infrastructure contribute to a smooth transition for teams.
Bookster, with a 0/5 rating in ease of use and no recent reviews, presents an unknown usability profile. Its lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess, but the absence of a strong user base suggests it may not match Mews’ user-friendliness.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated CRS, automated night audit, and a host of operational modules—features that are absent in Bookster. These capabilities empower your team to manage reservations, guest communication, revenue, and operations from a single platform.
Bookster, by comparison, only offers a handful of features focused on guest reviews and analytics, lacking the depth and breadth of automation and operational tools found in Mews. For a hotel seeking a comprehensive management solution, Mews’s feature set is unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts a 4.27/5 customer support score from over 750 recent reviews, with many customers highlighting quick, helpful responses and dedicated onboarding. Reviewers frequently mention that Mews’ support team sets new standards for responsiveness and problem-solving.
Bookster’s support quality remains unverified, with no recent reviews available to assess its responsiveness or effectiveness. Given Mews’ proven track record, it clearly leads in customer support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, revenue tools, and payment systems, giving your hotel the flexibility to build a tailored tech ecosystem. The Mews Marketplace offers over 1,000 third-party integrations, enabling advanced customization.
Bookster, with no verified integrations, limits your system’s expandability and adaptability. For hotels wishing to incorporate a broad range of tools seamlessly, Mews is the obvious choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, with industry-rated satisfaction including high praise from boutique, independent, and chain hotels. The platform’s recent NPS of 9.12 and 93% likelihood to recommend demonstrate strong customer loyalty.
Bookster’s review count is zero; therefore, no recent or reliable ratings exist. For a hotelier seeking validation from peers, Mews’s high rating and recent feedback make it the more trusted option.
Edge: Mews.
Bookster’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may lack transparent or scalable pricing. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or hidden costs, making it easier to budget.
If cost transparency is crucial, Mews’s clear pricing model supports a better financial planning process.
Mews is a comprehensive, widely adopted PMS with proven results, extensive features, and a strong customer support reputation. It helps hotels automate operations, improve guest satisfaction, and scale efficiently—making it the clear leader.
Bookster, while potentially suitable for very small or niche properties, lacks recent validation, extensive features, and support data. For serious hotels looking for reliability and growth, Mews is the smarter choice.
In sum, if your hotel is seeking a mature, feature-rich platform with proven customer satisfaction, Mews dominates. Its broad integrations, ease of use, and global presence provide the foundation your team needs to succeed in today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了... 最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了日常工作流程,并使前台和运营团队的培训变得更容易。
用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解... 用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解决缓慢、支持方式过于聊天化,或培训内容对复杂酒店配置来说过于通用。
用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动... 用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动操作,尤其在高峰期。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单... 账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单、对账以及公司账单等操作复杂或不够直观。
报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到... 报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到商业智能、分析仪表盘和导出选项是 Mews 可以更好支持数据驱动决策的方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bookster 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookster 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 352 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bookster:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookster 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐