The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is essential for your hotel’s success. Both Bookster and Sirvoy aim to streamline operations, but they serve different needs. While Bookster is designed for vacation rentals with a focus on guest reviews and analytics, Sirvoy offers a broad suite of features tailored for small to medium hotels. How do these differences impact your choice?
The key is understanding which system best fits your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and support expectations. Are you prioritizing ease of use and customer support, or do you need advanced features and integrations? Let’s compare both options.
Bookster, with a 0/5 overall rating and zero reviews, is virtually untested by users and lacks recent feedback, making it impossible to gauge real-world usability or support. Conversely, Sirvoy, with over 95 reviews in the last six months and a 4.85/5 customer support score, is clearly a more established option, particularly for hotels seeking proven reliability.
Both products aim to improve property management, but Sirvoy’s extensive feature set and positive user experiences suggest it’s more suited for hotels that want a comprehensive, user-friendly platform. Are you comfortable relying on an unreviewed product for your operations?
If your hotel primarily manages vacation rentals, villas, or small properties needing simple, analytics-driven management, Bookster could be appealing—though its lack of reviews makes this uncertain. For hotels, inns, boutique properties, or hostels that want a proven, well-supported system, Sirvoy is the clear choice, given its 95 recent reviews and high ratings.
For hotels that need robust guest communication, integrated booking engines, and channel management, Sirvoy’s 43 features make it a more complete solution. Conversely, if your focus is on consolidating guest feedback and analytics with minimal operational tools, Bookster might be suitable, despite its untested market presence.
Sirvoy’s high ease-of-use rating of 4.64/5 and documented positive onboarding experiences highlight its intuitive interface. Customers frequently praise its straightforward navigation, quick setup, and helpful support staff, making it especially suitable for staff unfamiliar with PMS technology.
Bookster, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating with no recent reviews, providing no credible data on its usability. Given the limited information, we can’t judge its user-friendliness, but the absence of feedback suggests it’s unproven or potentially underdeveloped.
Edge: Sirvoy
Sirvoy boasts 43 features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, online check-in/out, integrated payment processing, and mobile functionality. These features are designed for comprehensive hotel management and can be tailored to various property types.
Bookster offers no listed features, making it impossible to compare functionalities directly. Its lack of publicly available features indicates it may be limited or not yet developed for broader hotel management needs.
Edge: Sirvoy
Sirvoy’s 4.85/5 customer support score and recent positive reviews emphasize its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users describe support as “superior,” with quick responses that make problem-solving straightforward, even for new users.
Bookster’s support experience cannot be assessed due to no reviews. The absence of recent feedback leaves its customer service reputation unverified, making Sirvoy the safer choice for ongoing support.
Edge: Sirvoy
Sirvoy connects with 21 verified partners, including major channels like Booking.com, Expedia, GDS, and payment providers, enabling seamless reservation synchronization and channel management. Bookster, with no verified integrations listed, appears limited in this regard.
Having access to multiple integrations allows your hotel to expand its distribution and automate workflows. Sirvoy’s established partner network makes it a more scalable, connected system.
Edge: Sirvoy
Sirvoy’s recent reviews show an average rating of 4.64/5, with 94% of users likely to recommend it, especially among boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts. Its user base appreciates the system’s ease of use, support, and feature set.
Bookster’s ratings are nonexistent; therefore, no meaningful hotel segment feedback is available. Based on current data, Sirvoy is the more trusted and higher-rated solution.
Edge: Sirvoy
Bookster’s pricing is not publicly available, and it does not offer a free trial or transparent fees. In contrast, Sirvoy charges a $200/month base fee, with a 30-day trial, making costs clear upfront.
For hotels budgeting carefully or wanting predictable expenses, Sirvoy’s transparent pricing model is advantageous. The lack of pricing info for Bookster makes it difficult to assess its value proposition.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Bookster, with no reviews and no available features or recent feedback, remains an unproven entity in hotel PMS. It may be suitable for very niche vacation rental operators comfortable with limited functionality, but its unknown support and usability are a significant risk.
Sirvoy, supported by nearly 100 recent reviews and a high customer satisfaction score, stands out as a reliable, intuitive, and feature-rich solution. Its transparent pricing and extensive integrations make it a strong choice for small to medium hotels seeking a proven platform.
If your hotel needs a well-supported, flexible system with broad feature coverage, Sirvoy is the clear winner. Conversely, if your operation is limited to vacation rentals and you’re willing to accept unverified support, Bookster might be worth exploring—but with caution.
In conclusion, Sirvoy’s established reputation and recent positive feedback make it the safest, most reliable choice for your hotel’s management needs today.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bookster 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookster 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bookster:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookster 的 HT Score 为 0,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问