Cambridge PMS vs. Shiji Daylight PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 34 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 表现出色 .

Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cambridge PMS 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
75
推荐可能性
0%
90%
易用性
0.0/5
4.6/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.6/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.5/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $1,200/mo
经验证的评价 0 34

Cambridge PMS 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Shiji Group Shiji Group
优点
+ 易于使用
+ 支持团队
+ 执行
+ 培训材料
缺点
报告和分析
系统速度
集成能力

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 对比 Shiji Group:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Shiji Group Shiji Group
小型(10-24 间客房) #53 2 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #31 17 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #11 13 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #22 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Shiji Group Shiji Group
精品酒店 #33 17 条评价
豪华酒店 #24 25 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #22 19 条评价
长住酒店 #45 2 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Shiji Group Shiji Group
北美 #33 4 条评价
欧洲 #30 8 条评价
亚太 #14 5 条评价
中东 #5 14 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Cambridge PMS by Shiji and Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS requires understanding their core differences and how those differences align with your hotel’s needs. Both systems aim to streamline property operations, but they target distinct segments and feature sets. Cambridge PMS offers a purportedly comprehensive platform, but it hasn't received recent reviews or ratings, casting doubt on its current relevance. In contrast, Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS boasts a strong recent review presence, high user ratings, and a broad feature set. Are you willing to base your decision on outdated data, or do you prefer a solution with current, verified user feedback?

You need to evaluate which product better fits your hotel’s size, segment, and operational complexity. Cambridge PMS’s lack of recent reviews means its current performance and support are uncertain, while Shiji Group’s robust review history indicates ongoing satisfaction, especially among larger hotel groups. So, which system truly adapts to your hotel’s operational scale and strategic goals?

Is Cambridge PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS Better for Hotels?

Cambridge PMS appears to be a traditional property management system designed to handle core hotel functions. However, it has zero recent reviews, leaving its current capabilities and user satisfaction levels ambiguous. Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS, with 32 reviews in the last six months, has a clear advantage in recent validation from users actively working with the system.

Shiji’s system is favored for its ease of use, wide-ranging features, and support, making it more suitable for hotels seeking modern, scalable solutions. Cambridge PMS’s lack of recent feedback raises concerns about ongoing development, customer support, and feature updates. Do you want to risk investing in a system without recent validation, or do you prefer a product with a proven, current user base? The choice is clear: Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS is the more reliable option today.

Shiji Daylight PMS vs Cambridge PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a scalable, cloud-native PMS with a strong focus on automation, guest experience, and multi-property management, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. It’s especially suited for hotel groups or properties that value detailed reporting, integrations, and a modern user interface.

On the other hand, if your hotel is seeking a traditional, perhaps smaller-scale PMS with less emphasis on recent support and fewer reviews, Cambridge PMS might seem appealing—though its current performance and support quality remain unverified. Given the data, hotels that prioritize reliability, ongoing support, and a comprehensive feature set should opt for Shiji Group.

For independent properties or smaller hotels with minimal tech requirements, Cambridge could theoretically be considered, but its lack of recent validation makes it a risky choice. For hotels aiming for growth, operational efficiency, and guest personalization, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear recommendation.

Is Shiji Daylight PMS or Cambridge PMS Easier to Use?

User interface ratings clearly favor Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS, which scores 4.63 out of 5, compared to Cambridge’s zero rating. Recent reviews praise Shiji’s intuitive design, straightforward onboarding, and helpful training materials, which streamline staff adoption. Many hotel staff find the system “versatile, easy to learn, and easy to operate,” with positive remarks about its support team being “always available 24/7.”

In contrast, Cambridge PMS’s lack of recent reviews leaves its ease of use unverified. If your team values quick onboarding and minimal training hurdles, Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Features: Cambridge PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS offers a whopping 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, task management, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, guest messaging, digital registration, automated night audits, and more. These features enable comprehensive management and enhance guest experiences across multiple channels.

Cambridge PMS, with zero unique features listed and no recent updates, offers no clear advantage in features. Its feature set remains unverified in the current market context. For a hotel seeking a feature-rich, adaptable platform, Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cambridge PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Customer support ratings favor Shiji Group, which scores 4.53 out of 5, with comments highlighting its “support team’s professionalism and helpfulness.” Recent reviews mention “support is always available” and praise the onboarding process.

Cambridge PMS’s support history is unverified due to no recent reviews, making its current support quality uncertain. Given the importance of reliable support for smooth operations, Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has More Integrations: Cambridge PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Shiji Group boasts 64 verified integrations, including major partners like Bookboost, Revinate, SiteMinder, IDeaS, Amadeus, and more. This extensive partner network enables seamless connection to revenue management, marketing, and distribution systems.

Cambridge PMS only has one verified integration, limiting its connectivity options. If extensive integrations matter to your operations, Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cambridge PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Shiji Group’s recent review score of approximately 75 out of 100 and an NPS score of 8.94/5 indicate high satisfaction among users. Hotels across luxury, branded, and city-center segments report positive experiences, with many noting improvements in operational efficiency and guest engagement.

Cambridge PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its current customer sentiment unknown. For an active hotel seeking proven satisfaction, Edge: Shiji Group.

How Much Do Cambridge PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS Cost?

Cambridge PMS does not list any pricing information, suggesting it might be custom or outdated. Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS costs $1,200 per month, with no mention of setup fees or discounts.

Given the transparent pricing of Shiji Group and its recent reviews, it offers clear value for money compared to the uncertainty surrounding Cambridge PMS.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cambridge PMS?

  • Hotels that prefer traditional, straightforward systems and operate on minimal tech infrastructure.
  • Hotels with very basic operational needs, such as small boutique properties or private homes.
  • Teams that prioritize fixed, local solutions over cloud-based flexibility.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel needs scalable, multi-property management.
  • You require modern automation, integrations, or real-time reporting.
  • Your team values ongoing support and recent validation.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji Daylight PMS?

  • Hotels of all sizes, especially those with multiple properties seeking centralized data.
  • Teams that value automation, detailed reporting, and guest personalization.
  • Hotels aiming to reduce manual tasks and improve operational efficiency.
  • Brands or chains that need multi-lingual support, integrations, and scalable features.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel operates on a very tight, budget-limited infrastructure with minimal tech needs.
  • You prefer a system with minimal features or customization.
  • You are satisfied with basic, local solutions without modern automation.

Shiji Daylight PMS vs Cambridge PMS: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference is that Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS is actively supported, feature-rich, and highly rated, whereas Cambridge PMS remains unverified in recent reviews. If you want a modern, scalable PMS with proven user satisfaction, Shiji Group is the clear choice.

Choose Shiji Daylight PMS if you need a cloud-based, integrated platform that scales with your hotel’s growth, offers detailed reporting, and has extensive partner integrations. It’s the best fit for hotels that prioritize operational efficiency, guest experience, and long-term support.

Opt for Cambridge PMS only if your hotel’s needs are extremely basic, local, and you are comfortable with an unverified solution. Given the market data, Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS remains the superior, safer investment for most hotels today.

Cambridge PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Shiji Group Shiji Group
Starting Price From $1,200/mo

Cambridge PMS 有哪些 Shiji Daylight PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cambridge PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Shiji Group Shiji Group
任务管理
多种语言
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
网上值机
集中用户和角色管理

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 86 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 对比 Shiji Group(按业务目标)

我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Shiji Group Ruby Hotels 中型
+ Successfully went live with 21 hotels across Europe, with additional hotel openings planned in the near future.
+ Equipped with the level of API connectivity they needed to create connections between disparate data sets that would be impossible to achieve manually.
+ Mentions of Technology have increased by 2.5 points, Reception by 3 points and Service by 3.5 points.

"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."

Lucas Höfer
Lucas Höfer
Group Director of Systems and Innovation...
改善宾客体验
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Shiji Group Sunborn London 小型
+ �s fully integrated tech stack, the team unified their data, simplified workflows, and elevated every touchpoint of the guest journey.
+ From seamless check-in and instant mobile ordering to real-time housekeeping updates, everything now runs faster, smoother, and with less effort.
+ Most importantly, technology now works in the background, freeing up staff to focus on what really matters: delivering memorable, personalized experiences that live up to Sunborn

"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."

V
Vasilis Giannios
Operations Manager, Sunborn London

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 对比 Shiji Group:总结

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料
Shiji Group
Shiji Group
4.5/5 来自 34 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 97% 正面

用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。

支持团队 83% 正面

石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。

执行 83% 正面

一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告和分析 62% 负面

尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。

系统速度 57% 负面

与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。

独特功能

宾客资料 多种语言 集中用户和角色管理 任务管理 平板电脑/自助值机
4.6/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 64 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

易用性 Shiji Group 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Shiji Group 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)
性价比 Shiji Group 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)
入职培训 Shiji Group 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

关于 Cambridge PMS 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的常见问题

Cambridge PMS 能否替代 Shiji Daylight PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Cambridge PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cambridge PMS 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cambridge PMS 或 Shiji Daylight PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Cambridge PMS:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cambridge PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息