Cambridge PMS vs. Cloudbeds PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 29, 2026  ·  已分析 1,247 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,247 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 表现出色 .

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cambridge PMS 与 Cloudbeds PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,247 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
100
推荐可能性
0%
91%
易用性
0.0/5
4.6/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.4/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.3/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $600/mo
经验证的评价 0 1,247

Cambridge PMS 与 Cloudbeds PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,247 条经验证的评价后,Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 用户最看重其 ,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
优点
+ 用户友好界面
+ 实施与支持
+ 一体化生态系统
+ 渠道管理
缺点
预订管理
报表定制
系统速度

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 对比 Cloudbeds:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
小型(10-24 间客房) #1 592 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 212 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #5 42 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #13 4 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
精品酒店 #2 473 条评价
豪华酒店 #4 228 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #6 116 条评价
长住酒店 #2 93 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
北美 #2 435 条评价
欧洲 #7 163 条评价
亚太 #3 226 条评价
中东 #7 11 条评价

The Decision

When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel aims to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue. Both Cambridge PMS by Shiji and Cloudbeds PMS promise to serve these goals, but they diverge significantly in support, features, and market presence.

Cambridge PMS is a lesser-known, less reviewed platform with no recent user feedback or ratings, whereas Cloudbeds boasts over 1,000 recent reviews, a 4.63/5 overall rating, and a 91% likelihood of recommendation. Do you want a system backed by active user feedback and proven customer satisfaction, or are you comfortable with an obscure solution?

Is Cambridge PMS or Cloudbeds Better for Hotels?

Cambridge PMS claims to streamline hotel operations with a comprehensive platform, but it has no recent reviews, ratings, or verified customer feedback. In contrast, Cloudbeds dominates the market with over 1,070 reviews in the last six months alone, reflecting a highly engaged user base and current performance.

Cloudbeds’ recent reviews praise its ease of use, extensive features, and robust support, while Cambridge’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to gauge real-world performance or customer satisfaction. Are you willing to trust an unreviewed platform, or would you prefer a proven solution with confirmed results?

Cloudbeds vs Cambridge PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with proven user satisfaction, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It suits properties looking for integrated channel management, booking engines, automation, and extensive third-party integrations, especially if geographic reach and ongoing support matter to you.

If your hotel is a large, complex operation that prefers a less common, potentially customizable solution without recent reviews or proven support, Cambridge PMS might seem appealing. However, due to the stark difference in recent customer feedback, Cloudbeds remains the safer, more reliable option for most hoteliers.

Is Cambridge PMS or Cloudbeds Easier to Use?

Cloudbeds’ interface wins hands down, with a 4.61/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews praising its intuitive design, straightforward setup, and staff-friendly onboarding. Many users mention how quickly their teams adapt to Cloudbeds, with some saying, “It’s so easy we onboarded staff in days.”

Cambridge PMS has no recent ratings or reviews available. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Given Cloudbeds’ high recent scores, edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Features: Cambridge PMS or Cloudbeds?

Cloudbeds offers 64 distinct features, including a channel manager, reservation system, revenue management, guest communication, automated night audits, and integrations with 190 partners. Several users comment on its comprehensive nature, noting, “It’s the only system we need for reservations, billing, and distribution.”

Cambridge PMS provides no detailed feature list and no recent reviews to validate its capabilities. Its limited publicly available information suggests a less extensive feature set. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cambridge PMS or Cloudbeds?

Cloudbeds’ support is highly rated, with a 4.41/5 support rating and reviews describing it as “responsive,” “helpful,” and “quick to resolve issues.” Customers appreciate the ongoing assistance that keeps their operations running smoothly.

Cambridge PMS has no recent support ratings or customer testimonials, making it impossible to evaluate its responsiveness or quality. Based on current data, edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has More Integrations: Cambridge PMS or Cloudbeds?

Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified integrations, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and third-party tools, providing extensive flexibility. Users frequently mention its broad marketplace and ease of connecting new systems.

Cambridge PMS has only one verified partner listed, indicating minimal integration options. For properties that rely on diverse third-party tools, Cloudbeds offers far superior connectivity. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cambridge PMS or Cloudbeds?

Cloudbeds’ recent reviews show a 4.63/5 rating, with many property types—boutiques, hostels, vacation rentals—raving about its ease of use, features, and support. Hotels across segments like B&Bs, hostels, and small hotels mostly rate Cloudbeds highly, often citing increased bookings and operational simplicity.

Cambridge PMS has no recent reviews or ratings to compare. Based on available data, Cloudbeds is clearly the preferred choice among active hoteliers. Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do Cambridge PMS and Cloudbeds Cost?

Cloudbeds charges $600/month with no setup fee, with no mention of discounts or tiered pricing. Cambridge PMS’s pricing is unavailable, and it offers no free trial or transparent fee structure.

Given Cloudbeds’ transparent, predictable pricing and extensive features, it provides a clear value proposition. The lack of pricing info for Cambridge PMS makes comparison impossible, but market norms favor Cloudbeds.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cambridge PMS?

  • Hotels that prefer a potentially customizable solution and are comfortable with limited support or community feedback.
  • Small to medium properties seeking a straightforward, possibly less costly platform.
  • Hotels with in-house technical support ready to manage an unverified system.

Not ideal if you need proven reliability, extensive features, or active support. Given the lack of recent reviews, it’s better suited for properties willing to accept higher risk.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Small to medium hotels, hostels, boutique properties, and vacation rentals seeking a versatile, scalable PMS.
  • Teams that prioritize ease of use, modern automation, and extensive integrations.
  • Hotels looking to grow their direct bookings, improve operational efficiency, and gain detailed reports.

Not ideal if your hotel operates in a region with unreliable internet, or if you prefer an entirely offline system. Cloudbeds is best suited for properties that want a proven, supported system.

Cloudbeds vs Cambridge PMS: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds is a complete, user-friendly platform with proven customer satisfaction, extensive features, and a broad network of integrations. Its active community and recent reviews confirm it’s a trusted choice for hoteliers aiming for growth and operational simplicity.

Cambridge PMS appears to be a less proven, unreviewed system with minimal publicly available information. Without recent customer feedback, its reliability and support remain uncertain, making Cloudbeds the safer, more dependable option.

If your hotel values a platform with current, verified reviews and proven performance, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It’s ideal for hotels looking to streamline operations, enhance guest experiences, and scale their business confidently.


In summary:

  • For a proven, fully-featured, and well-supported PMS—choose Cloudbeds.
  • For a lesser-known, potentially customizable solution without recent feedback—Cambridge PMS might be considered, but with significant risk.

Prioritize your hotel’s growth and operational stability by selecting a platform with demonstrated, recent success—Cloudbeds delivers that reliably.

Cambridge PMS 和 Cloudbeds PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
Starting Price From $600/mo

Cambridge PMS 有哪些 Cloudbeds PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cambridge PMS 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Cloudbeds Cloudbeds
2路实时集成
PMS 连接性
分析仪表板
库存管理
集中的用户和角色管理
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 52 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 对比 Cloudbeds(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
提高运营效率
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
改善宾客体验
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 对比 Cloudbeds:总结

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料
Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,247 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户友好界面 100% 正面

Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。

实施与支持 71% 正面

Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。

一体化生态系统 92% 正面

Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

预订管理 47% 负面

Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。

报表定制 50% 负面

尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。

独特功能

频道管理员 集中的用户和角色管理 PMS 连接性 分析仪表板 库存管理
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 189 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
易用性 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Cloudbeds 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
性价比 Cloudbeds 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)
入职培训 Cloudbeds 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)

关于 Cambridge PMS 与 Cloudbeds PMS 的常见问题

Cambridge PMS 能否替代 Cloudbeds PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Cambridge PMS 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cambridge PMS 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cambridge PMS 或 Cloudbeds PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Cambridge PMS:否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cambridge PMS 和 Cloudbeds PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 的 HT Score 为 0,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息