The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 表现出色 .
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 887 |
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Cambridge PMS by Shiji and Mews PMS aim to streamline processes, but they diverge significantly in maturity, user adoption, and feature depth. With Mews boasting a larger, more recent review base and higher ratings, it’s clear that industry preference leans toward the cloud-native, highly integrated solution. Are you ready to prioritize current user feedback and real-world performance?
Cambridge PMS by Shiji has historically been a traditional, on-premise solution with a focus on basic property management. Its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s no longer a competitive choice in today’s fast-evolving hotel tech environment. Mews, on the other hand, is cloud-based, boasting over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, indicating widespread hotel satisfaction. Given its modern architecture and active development, Mews clearly addresses the needs of contemporary hotels better. Would you prefer a legacy system with limited updates or a vibrant, scalable platform?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-first platform that integrates over 336 third-party tools—including revenue management, booking engine, and guest CRM—then Mews is the clear choice. It’s well-suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, and chains seeking rapid growth, thanks to its scalability and extensive marketplace. Conversely, if your property is small, with minimal tech needs and a preference for traditional on-premise solutions, Cambridge might seem suitable, but its lack of recent performance data makes it less reliable now.
Mews’s ease of use is reflected in its 4.7/5 rating based on 98 recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its modern interface, intuitive workflows, and quick onboarding. Reviewers describe Mews as “the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market,” with many noting staff adoption is straightforward. Cambridge, with a 0/5 rating and virtually no recent reviews, offers no comparable user feedback, suggesting it’s outdated and difficult for modern teams. Edge: Mews.
Mews provides over 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, and real-time reporting—many of which are absent in Cambridge. The latter’s lack of features and zero recent updates make it essentially a basic property management tool. If your hotel values automation, guest personalization, and operational flexibility, Mews’s extensive feature set gives it a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 for support, with recent reviews highlighting its prompt, helpful onboarding and ongoing assistance. Hoteliers remark that “support is responsive and proactive,” making deployment smoother. Conversely, Cambridge’s support scores and recent reviews are nonexistent, indicating it’s likely inactive or no longer prioritized. For ongoing success and troubleshooting, Mews’s support team is clearly more dependable. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like Duetto and a marketplace with over 1,000 apps covering revenue, channel management, POS, and more. Cambridge’s single verified partner severely limits its ecosystem. If your hotel relies on diverse integrations to enhance operations, Mews’s expansive ecosystem is essential. Edge: Mews.
With a 4.62/5 rating and nearly 758 recent reviews, predominantly from boutique, hostel, and independent hotels, Mews’s user satisfaction is evident. Many reviewers praise its modern design and automation, with comments like “it’s the easiest PMS to learn and use.” Cambridge remains unreviewed recently, making it impossible to compare recent user sentiment. Clearly, Mews holds the current favor among hoteliers. Edge: Mews.
Cambridge PMS provides no publicly available pricing, typical of legacy systems, likely involving custom quotes or high implementation costs. Mews charges a fixed $900 monthly base fee, with additional costs depending on integrations and modules. While the total cost varies, Mews’s transparent pricing and high ROI are attractive for hotels seeking predictable costs and scalable solutions.
The core difference lies in their tech approach: Cambridge is a legacy, on-premise system with no recent updates, while Mews is a cloud-native platform with a proven track record of recent, high-quality reviews. If your hotel values ongoing innovation, extensive features, and user satisfaction, Mews is the clear winner. For hotels seeking a reliable, future-proof solution, Mews’s superior ecosystem and active support make it the better choice.
Mews’s large, recent review base and high ratings demonstrate its dominance in today’s hotel management landscape. It offers a robust, feature-rich platform that’s proven to improve efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue for hotels of all sizes. Cambridge PMS, by comparison, appears obsolete given its lack of recent activity and reviews. If you want a future-proof, highly rated PMS, Mews is the clear, definitive choice for your hotel.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cambridge PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 47 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cambridge PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cambridge PMS 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cambridge PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问