The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 表现出色 .
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 395 |
在分析了 395 条经验证的评价后,Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 用户最看重其 ,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 运营效率, 数据和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
数据和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #5 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to find a platform that simplifies operations, boosts revenue, and enhances guest experiences. Cambridge PMS by Shiji and ThinkReservations PMS both aim to address these needs but approach them differently. While Cambridge PMS is a less-reviewed, more traditional system, ThinkReservations offers a highly-rated, feature-rich platform with recent, abundant reviews. Given the review volume and recent positive feedback, ThinkReservations currently holds a stronger market presence.
Are you prioritizing ease of use, extensive features, or proven customer satisfaction? Let’s compare these two options to see which better suits your hotel’s needs.
Cambridge PMS, by Shiji, appears as a less-reviewed, less-rated solution with zero recent reviews, raising questions about its current support and usability. In contrast, ThinkReservations has over 350 reviews, with the last six months showing four new reviews, all highly positive, indicating active support and ongoing development. The lack of recent feedback for Cambridge PMS suggests it may not be as reliable or current.
The core problem both systems aim to solve is streamlining hotel operations—booking, guest management, and reporting. Cambridge PMS’s limited review data and no recent feedback make it difficult to gauge its effectiveness today. Conversely, ThinkReservations’s recent reviews consistently praise operational efficiency, support, and ease of use. Do you want a system with established reputation and active community feedback?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, easy-to-use platform with a proven track record of customer satisfaction, go with ThinkReservations. Its 4.88/5 rating and 356 reviews demonstrate strong, recent positive sentiment, especially from small to mid-sized properties like B&Bs, inns, and boutique hotels. ThinkReservations is ideal if streamlining operations and increasing revenue are priorities.
If, however, your hotel demands a highly customizable, enterprise-level system with extensive integration options and regional support in multiple countries, Cambridge PMS might be considered. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited features (only one verified partner, Duetto) suggest it may not be the best fit for fast-paced, modern hotels wanting active vendor support. Given the current data, ThinkReservations clearly leads in suitability for most hoteliers.
ThinkReservations boasts a 4.82/5 ease-of-use rating from over 350 reviews, with many users highlighting its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and staff adoption. Reviewers frequently mention how quickly staff can get up to speed and how the platform streamlines daily tasks. Support is consistently rated highly, with users describing the team as accessible, knowledgeable, and helpful.
Cambridge PMS’s ease of use cannot be reliably assessed due to no recent reviews or ratings, which is a red flag for hotels needing a user-friendly, current platform. Without active user feedback, confidence in its usability remains uncertain.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations offers 39 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, EPoS, online check-in, guest messaging, automated night audit, multi-currency, and more—covering nearly every operational need for a modern hotel. It also supports guest communication, digital registration, and real-time reporting, making it a comprehensive solution.
Cambridge PMS, on the other hand, provides no specific features or modules listed, with only one verified integration (Duetto). This suggests it may lack the depth and versatility of ThinkReservations’ suite. If advanced features and integrations are critical, ThinkReservations has a clear edge.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations consistently receives 4.82/5 ratings from over 350 reviews, with users praising its fast, accessible, and knowledgeable support team. Many reviews mention how support helped resolve issues quickly and how onboarding was smooth, even for non-tech-savvy staff.
Cambridge PMS’s support quality cannot be gauged due to no recent reviews or ratings. Without current feedback, it’s tough to assess whether it offers the same level of responsive, effective customer service.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations offers 16 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, Airbnb, Triptease, and TrustYou, along with built-in payment processing and channel management. Its API and partnership network support a broad range of tools, enabling seamless connectivity.
Cambridge PMS, with only one verified partner (Duetto), provides limited integration options, which could restrict your ability to connect with other essential systems. For most hotels aiming for a flexible, connected setup, ThinkReservations is the better choice.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations has a high overall rating of 4.88/5 based on 356 reviews, with recent reviews emphasizing operational efficiency, excellent support, and revenue growth. Small properties, like B&Bs and inns, repeatedly praise how it streamlines booking and guest management.
Cambridge PMS’s rating is zero, with no reviews to support its effectiveness or hoteliers’ satisfaction. This makes it impossible to compare, but the lack of recent reviews suggests it is not currently favored or actively supported.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Cambridge PMS does not list pricing, likely indicating a bespoke or enterprise quote is required. This makes direct comparison difficult and suggests it may be more expensive or less transparent.
ThinkReservations charges a flat fee of $500 per month, with no implementation or setup fees. Its transparent pricing and straightforward model make budgeting easier for small and mid-sized hotels.
Overall, ThinkReservations provides clear, predictable costs, making it easier to assess value.
Cambridge PMS is best suited for:
Not ideal if:
ThinkReservations is ideal for:
Not ideal if:
Cambridge PMS positions itself as a comprehensive, enterprise-focused platform with limited recent feedback, making its current performance and support uncertain. It may serve larger hotels or chains that need extensive customization and are prepared for bespoke solutions.
ThinkReservations, with over 350 recent reviews and a 4.88/5 rating, clearly demonstrates its effectiveness for small and mid-sized properties. Its ease of use, robust features, and active support make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today.
If you prioritize a proven, highly-rated solution with ongoing support, go with ThinkReservations. For larger, complex operations looking for deep customization and regional availability, Cambridge PMS could be considered, but with caution given the limited recent feedback.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cambridge PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 27 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。
ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。
该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。
强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cambridge PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cambridge PMS 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cambridge PMS:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] 的 HT Score 为 0,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问