The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 123 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Casablanca 表现出色 在 支持质量 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Online Check-in and Guest App.
Counter 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 123 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 66 | 57 |
在分析了 123 条经验证的评价后,Casablanca 用户最看重其 支持质量, 用户友好性, 持续改进,而 Counter 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
额外费用
▾
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
−
收益管理和收入优化
▾
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 44 条评价 | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #42 11 条评价 | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #36 8 条评价 | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #37 6 条评价 | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #55 2 条评价 | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 62 条评价 | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Casablanca hotelsoftware (PMS) and Counter hinges on your hotel’s size, target market, and operational complexity. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but Casablanca offers a broad, all-in-one solution focusing on full-scale hotel operations, while Counter is tailored for hostels and small properties emphasizing ease of use and mobility. Your decision should consider not just features but also support, integration, and scalability.
Casablanca is a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS with a solid reputation for support and extensive integrations, while Counter provides a streamlined, mobile-friendly experience designed specifically for hostels. Which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Casablanca offers a centralized, all-in-one hotel management system with 46 verified partners, including advanced features like online check-in, guest apps, and yield management. Its deep integration capabilities and extensive feature set make it suitable for larger, more complex hotels or chains.
Counter, with its 7 verified integrations and a focus on simplicity, excels in small-scale, budget-friendly properties like hostels. Its mobile-first interface and automated features significantly reduce manual tasks for limited-staff settings.
Both aim to improve operational efficiency, but Casablanca’s robust suite targets full-scale hotel operations, whereas Counter simplifies core processes for hostels. Do your hotel’s needs lean toward extensive customization and scalability, or ease of use and mobility?
If your hotel needs a scalable, fully integrated PMS with a broad feature set supporting multiple properties, go with Casablanca. It’s ideal if you require tools like rate management, digital registration, guest messaging, and extensive reporting, especially for mid-sized to large hotels.
If your focus is on a hostel or small property that values quick onboarding, user-friendly mobile management, and automation—particularly for contactless check-ins—Counter is the better fit. It caters to hostels prioritizing operational simplicity, with features like POS integration and automatic payments.
For multi-property chains or hotels seeking advanced yield management, Casablanca’s your choice. For budget-conscious or small-scale hostels, Counter’s straightforward, mobile approach will likely serve you better.
Casablanca has a high ease-of-use rating of 4.8/5 but is noted for its extensive capabilities, which can introduce some complexity for new staff. Users praise its intuitive interface and quick onboarding (rated 4.74/5), but initially, mastering all features may take time.
Counter scores slightly lower at 4.6/5, reflecting its straightforward, mobile-optimized design that’s easy for staff to learn and adopt. Reviewers highlight its clean interface and simple calendar management, which simplifies daily operations.
Edge: Casablanca. While both are user-friendly, Casablanca’s well-designed interface and high support ratings make it easier for larger teams to efficiently navigate its broader feature set.
Casablanca surpasses Counter significantly in feature count, with 27 exclusive features such as online check-in, guest apps, digital registration, integrated ID scanners, guest messaging, task management, and automated space optimization. It also offers tools tailored to revenue management, GDPR compliance, and in-room check-in options.
Counter provides core PMS functionalities with 6 unique features, including payment processing, housekeeping modules, automated night audit, and multi-lingual support. Its features are focused mainly on operational automation and integration, suitable for budget properties.
Edge: Casablanca. Its extensive suite of features supports complex hotel operations, while Counter’s lean feature set is sufficient for small properties but less adaptable for larger, multi-service hotels.
Casablanca’s support is highly rated at 4.82/5, with reviewers emphasizing rapid, competent responses and support availability even on weekends. Many praise its support team for being customer-oriented and quick to resolve issues.
Counter surpasses that slightly with a 4.96/5 rating, with users highlighting its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially from team members like Evelyn and Max. Some mention slower responses during off-hours, but overall, support is seen as highly effective.
Edge: Counter. Its slightly higher support rating and positive recent reviews make it the more reliable choice for urgent, ongoing assistance.
Casablanca boasts 46 verified integration partners, including top-tier solutions like Profitroom, Customer Alliance, and Onity, along with shared partners such as SiteMinder and Stripe. These connections enable extensive automation, revenue management, and third-party system integration.
Counter offers 7 verified integrations, including Stripe for payments and Goki for access control, plus shared integrations with Stripe and others. Its ecosystem is smaller but still functional for core hostel operations.
Edge: Casablanca. Its broader range of verified partners facilitates more versatile and scalable integrations, critical for larger properties or chains.
Casablanca has a lower overall rating of 0/5, largely due to its very limited number of recent reviews (2 in the last 6 months), and the rating discrepancy suggests less recent validation. Its NPS score is high at 9.87/10, but the limited feedback makes this less reliable.
Counter, with 54 reviews, maintains a high 4.73/5 overall rating and a stable NPS of 9.02/10, especially among hostel properties, which constitute the majority of its user base. Its recent reviews are more plentiful, indicating current user satisfaction.
Since more recent reviews favor Counter, and its rating reflects consistent performance, edge: Counter.
Pricing for Casablanca is not publicly disclosed, and no free trial is available; it's typically a premium system suited for larger hotels with bigger budgets. Implementation fees and ongoing costs are likely, given its enterprise-level features.
Counter is also not priced publicly, but it’s a free platform, making it attractive for small hostels or budget properties. Some users note potential costs for add-ons or extra integrations, but core usage is free.
Edge: Counter, especially for small properties or hostels seeking an affordable, no-cost solution.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-limited, or prioritizes a simple, mobile setup with minimal tech investment.
Not ideal if your property requires advanced revenue management, large-scale integrations, or multi-property oversight.
Casablanca is a comprehensive solution suited for mid to large-sized hotels or chains aiming for a fully integrated system with extensive features. Its broad integrations and scalability support sophisticated operations, but its higher complexity and cost make it less suitable for small or budget hotels.
Counter excels in simplicity, mobility, and automation tailored for hostels and small properties. Its free model and focus on core operational automation help reduce manual workload and support quick onboarding, though it lacks the advanced features necessary for larger, multi-property hotels.
Choose Casablanca if your hotel needs a full-featured, scalable PMS with extensive integrations and advanced management tools. It’s best if you have the resources to implement and maintain a complex system.
Opt for Counter if your property is a hostel or small hotel prioritizing ease of use, quick setup, and automation—especially if budget is a concern. It’s ideal for properties that value mobility and straightforward management.
In conclusion, for now, Casablanca’s more recent reviews, higher overall support ratings, and broader feature set make it the stronger choice for larger or more complex hotels. Counter remains a compelling, no-cost option for small properties looking to streamline core operations with minimal fuss.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 Counter 共享 13 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 21 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the last two years, we have intensively worked with the hotelsoftware and analyzed all processes down to the smallest detail and, based on this, implemented the appropriate resu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他... 许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他们可以获得持续可靠的帮助。
评论一致称赞 Casablanca 易于使用且直观的界面,让经验丰富的员工和新员工都能快速上手。一些用户指出,随着软件的发展,它有时会对新手用户变得有点复杂。
用户对 Casablanca 不断添加新功能并根据客户反馈改进其可用性表示赞赏。不过,一些人指出,他们希望新功能的实施时间更加透明,并有时间表。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍担心的是更新和新界面带来的额外成本,这对规模较小的酒店来说可能是个问题。尽管人们对该软件的功能普遍满意,但这一方面被认为是缺点。
许多用户强调卡萨布兰卡的收益管理和动态定价工具对于增加收入至关重要。收益价格、图形预订路线和追加销售机会等功能有助于提高财务业绩。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 提供 46 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS):否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Casablanca 的 HT Score 为 68,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问