The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 177 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 Counter 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
价格
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #65 0 条评价 | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #58 2 条评价 | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s efficiency and guest experience. CiHMS by CiHMS and Counter by Counter both aim to streamline operations but serve distinctly different hotel segments and operational needs. With CiHMS offering a comprehensive, feature-rich platform and Counter providing an easy-to-use, mobile-friendly solution for hostels, your decision depends on your hotel’s size, scope, and specific management challenges. Which one aligns best with your priorities?
Both CiHMS and Counter aim to simplify property management, but they target different types of hotels. CiHMS excels with large properties and chains needing detailed operations, multi-channel reservations, and revenue management tools. Counter, on the other hand, is designed for hostels and small properties, emphasizing simplicity, mobility, and quick onboarding. Do you need a broad feature set or an intuitive, straightforward experience?
While CiHMS can handle complex, multi-property environments with advanced modules like spa and wellness, revenue management, and integrated CRS, Counter focuses on core PMS functions such as check-in/out, POS, and guest management—without charging for those features. Does your property require extensive customization and automation, or is ease of use your primary concern?
Recent reviews favor CiHMS due to its higher overall ratings and more recent feedback. Its 101 reviews in the last six months showcase ongoing user engagement and satisfaction. Counter, with half as many reviews, has relatively recent positive feedback but lacks the volume and recency to challenge CiHMS’s dominance.
In summary, if your hotel needs a robust, scalable, and feature-rich system, CiHMS is the clear choice. If simplicity, quick deployment, and mobile management are your priorities, Counter might suffice. But for up-to-date feedback and extensive features, CiHMS’s recent reviews make it the stronger option.
If your hotel operates at a large scale, chain, or resort, and requires advanced revenue management, multi-channel distribution, and extensive reporting, go with CiHMS. Its array of modules, such as integrated CRS, digital registration, and house-keeping apps, supports complex management workflows.
Conversely, if your property is a hostel, B&B, or small hotel seeking an easy-to-learn system that staff can adopt quickly, Counter is the better fit. Its intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and integration with essential tools like POS and channel management make it ideal for budget or independent hostels.
For hotels that prioritize automation, detailed reporting, and customization, CiHMS’s 16 dedicated features and robust integrations make it the more capable choice. If your focus is on simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and fast onboarding, Counter’s straightforward approach will serve you better.
In short, choose CiHMS if you need a comprehensive, scalable solution. Choose Counter if you prefer ease of use, quick setup, and minimal complexity.
CiHMS boasts an impressive average ease-of-use rating of 4.9/5, supported by a 4.84/5 onboarding score, indicating a user-friendly experience once the system is learned. Its lean UI and stable performance are praised, but some users mention that initial training can be complex due to the system’s breadth. Support responsiveness is high, yet some report occasional system hangups and synchronization issues.
Counter scores a strong 4.6/5 for ease of use, with a simple, mobile-friendly interface that newcomers find intuitive. Its onboarding score of 4.7/5 reflects ease of initial setup, especially for small properties and hostels. Users appreciate how quickly staff can learn to manage bookings and check-ins, though some bug issues and slow support in certain zones are noted.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers 16 features exclusive to its platform, including a spa & wellness module, revenue management, integrated CRS, digital registration, automated space optimization, and PCI compliance. These cater to large, multi-faceted properties needing extensive automation and customization. Additionally, it includes tools for rate management, task management, and real-time reporting.
Counter provides 17 shared features, plus two unique: payment processing and guest CRM. Its core strengths are contactless check-in, automated payments, and mobile management, specifically suited for hostels and small properties. Its limited advanced features make it less suitable for complex operations but highly accessible.
In terms of feature count, CiHMS’s additional modules, especially revenue management and integrated CRS, make it the more capable platform for large-scale hotels. Counter’s key differentiation lies in its simplicity and ease of use, with essential automation.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s support scores a remarkable 4.92/5, with reviews praising its professionalism and promptness—support staff are described as "always reachable" and "helpful." Users mention that onboarding is smooth despite the system's complexity, and issues are resolved quickly.
Counter boasts an even higher 4.96/5 rating, with reviewers highlighting its responsive and personable team, especially support personnel like Evelyn and Max. Some users note slower response times during off-hours but generally confirm their satisfaction with ongoing support.
Edge: Counter.
CiHMS is verified with three integration partners, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway. Its integrations focus on channel management and distribution, but its total is fewer compared to Counter.
Counter has seven verified integrations, including Stripe, GOKI, and Cloudbeds. Its broader ecosystem supports seamless online payments, access control, and channel management, making it more adaptable to diverse operational needs.
Counter’s higher number of integrations (7 vs 3) gives it a slight edge for properties seeking flexible connectivity with third-party platforms.
Edge: Counter.
CiHMS’s review score averages around 0/5 due to a likely typographical error, but its recent reviews and 98% likelihood of recommendation suggest high satisfaction. Its users, mainly large resorts and city hotels, appreciate detailed features, though some report system slowdowns during peak times.
Counter, with a 4.73/5 rating based on 54 reviews, is favored by hostel operators and small hotels. Users praise its simplicity and responsiveness, with reviews noting that it "loads seamlessly" and is "easy to understand," making it ideal for budget properties.
Given the volume and recency, Counter’s higher user-rated score and recent positive feedback indicate a more satisfied user base.
Edge: Counter.
CiHMS’s pricing is $900 monthly, with no free tier or trial available. Its cost reflects its extensive features and targeted enterprise-level management.
Counter’s pricing structure is not explicitly detailed but is described as free, with no mention of hidden fees or tiered plans, emphasizing its affordability for small properties and hostels.
If budget is a concern, Counter’s free model provides significant value, whereas CiHMS’s higher price suits larger properties needing comprehensive tools.
Not ideal if your property is small, budget-constrained, or primarily hostel-focused, due to the higher cost and complexity.
Not ideal if your property needs advanced revenue management, multi-property support, or detailed reporting features.
CiHMS is a comprehensive PMS solution designed for large hotels, resorts, and chains needing detailed automation, integrations, and revenue insights. Its extensive feature set justifies its higher price point and complexity, making it suitable for properties with complex operational needs.
Counter offers a simple, accessible platform ideal for hostels and small hotels that value ease of use, quick onboarding, and essential automation. Its mobile-friendly design, responsive support, and zero-cost entry make it a compelling choice for budget-conscious properties.
Choose CiHMS if you need a scalable, feature-rich platform capable of managing complex operations. Opt for Counter if your property is small, requires minimal training, and benefits from a straightforward, easy-to-manage system.
In conclusion, for hotels seeking recent reviews, high user satisfaction, and an extensive feature set, CiHMS stands out as the stronger choice. For hostels and small properties valuing simplicity and affordability, Counter remains an excellent, reliable option.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问