The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CiHMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 120 | 0 |
在分析了 120 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #65 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #58 2 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between CiHMS by CiHMS and Engisoft by Enginyeria de Software S.A. hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, regional presence, and desired features. While both aim to streamline property management, they differ markedly in market footprint, review backing, and functionality depth. Your decision should reflect which platform aligns best with your operational scope and growth ambitions.
CiHMS offers a well-established, highly-rated solution with extensive customer feedback, whereas Engisoft lacks recent reviews and broader market validation. Is your priority a proven system with active user insights, or are you exploring a less tested option?
CiHMS emerges as the more compelling choice for most hoteliers based on review data, boasting 101 recent reviews with a 4.92/5 customer support score and a 98% likelihood to recommend. Its high ease of use rating (4.9/5) and broad feature set position it as a versatile PMS capable of supporting diverse hotel segments.
In contrast, Engisoft has no recent reviews, no ratings, and a limited feature set, which raises questions about its current market relevance and user satisfaction. While Engisoft covers fundamental reservation and billing functions, the absence of recent feedback makes assessing its performance and stability challenging.
For hoteliers seeking a reliable, well-supported platform with ongoing user insights, CiHMS’s recent review activity and high satisfaction scores clearly position it as the stronger choice. Does your hotel require proven performance backed by a broad user base, or are you willing to consider a less documented solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive PMS that handles multi-channel reservations, flexible rate management, and advanced reporting, CiHMS is the clear pick. Its extensive feature set includes channel management, booking engine, guest profiles, EPoS, and automated space optimization—features only available in CiHMS. Additionally, its recent reviews highlight its stability, ease of access, and integration capabilities.
Conversely, if your hotel primarily requires basic reservation, billing, and guest management tools without the need for complex integrations or advanced revenue features, Engisoft could suffice. However, with no recent reviews or detailed user feedback, it’s difficult to gauge whether it offers the same reliability or feature depth.
For hotels that prioritize proven, feature-rich solutions with active user validation, CiHMS is the better choice. If your operation is small, simple, and cost-sensitive, and you’re comfortable risking less market validation, Engisoft might be worth considering.
Based on ratings, CiHMS is far easier to adopt and navigate, with a 4.9/5 user experience rating supported by detailed onboarding scores of 4.84/5. Users commend its intuitive interface, stability, and the support team’s professionalism, making staff onboarding smoother.
In contrast, Engisoft has no available ratings or recent user feedback, making it impossible to assess its ease of use. Without concrete data, it’s uncertain whether it offers the same streamlined experience or if your team will face a steep learning curve.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS boasts 17 shared features with Engisoft plus 16 unique functionalities, including channel management, booking engine, guest profiles, EPoS, multi-currency support, automated space optimization, and PCI compliance. Its rich feature set caters to mid-sized and larger hotels seeking full control over operations.
Engisoft offers only 2 features exclusive to its platform—payment processing and guest CRM—limiting its scope to core reservation and billing tasks. With fewer capabilities, it may fall short for hotels seeking extensive operational automation.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s 4.92/5 customer support score is based on over 100 recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful onboarding process. Many reviewers mention quick resolution times and ongoing assistance, enhancing overall satisfaction.
Engisoft’s support ratings are not available, and no recent reviews exist to gauge its responsiveness or quality. The lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess whether your team will receive timely, effective support.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS integrates with 3 verified partners, including popular platforms like SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, supporting essential distribution and booking channels. Its integrations cover key operational touchpoints, facilitating smoother workflows.
Engisoft boasts 8 verified partners, including major providers like Lybra Tech, Mirai, Dingus, and Onity, offering a broader ecosystem. However, without recent performance data or reviews, the practical benefits of these integrations remain uncertain.
Edge: Engisoft.
CiHMS’s reviews, totaling 101 over the past six months, reflect high satisfaction, with a 4.92/5 customer support score and a 98% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of various sizes, especially resorts and city center properties, praise its functionality and stability.
Engisoft has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The absence of feedback suggests limited current adoption or visibility in the market.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS is priced at a $900 base fee, with no mention of free trials or tiered plans. Its straightforward pricing allows for budget planning, especially for mid-sized hotels seeking feature-rich solutions.
Engisoft’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates direct cost comparisons. Lack of transparent pricing may indicate custom quotes or a less standardized pricing model.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with a very limited budget or requires only basic reservation functions. Small boutique hotels or single-property operators might find the extensive features excessive.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced revenue management, channel distribution, or comprehensive guest profiling. Larger, multi-property hotels may find Engisoft’s features too limited.
CiHMS’s core difference lies in its proven, feature-rich platform with extensive user validation, especially in regions outside Europe. Its broad functionality, high customer ratings, and active support make it suitable for mid- to large-scale properties aiming to streamline operations and boost revenue.
Choose CiHMS if you value a trusted system with detailed reporting, automation, and ongoing user feedback. Its large review base and recent feedback confirm its reliability and customer satisfaction.
Engisoft presents a more limited, less documented solution. While it offers essential reservation and billing functions, the lack of recent reviews and fewer features suggest it’s better suited for small hotels or properties with minimal operational complexity and a focus on basic management.
If your hotel needs a dependable, well-supported PMS with proven performance, CiHMS is the clear choice. For hotels with simple requirements and a willingness to explore less validated solutions, Engisoft could be considered, though the risks are higher.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CiHMS 和 Engisoft 共享 17 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Engisoft 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Engisoft 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Engisoft:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问