The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CiHMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Housekeeping module.
HOIST GROUP 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 120 | 0 |
在分析了 120 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 HOIST GROUP 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #65 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #58 2 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both CiHMS by CiHMS and HotSoft by HOIST GROUP aim to enhance hotel management, but they differ significantly in market presence, features, and support. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a well-rated, feature-rich platform with proven support or a less documented but potentially capable alternative.
With 101 reviews and a high recent rating, CiHMS emerges as the clearer choice for hoteliers seeking a mature, well-supported PMS. Its extensive feature set and regional presence provide tangible benefits for hotels aiming to streamline operations and improve guest experiences. Are you ready to see how they compare on the key factors?
Both CiHMS and HotSoft aim to simplify hotel operations, but CiHMS’s strong review count and recent positive feedback set it apart. CiHMS’s cloud-based platform offers advanced modules like revenue management, channel management, and integrated CRS, all of which are absent in HotSoft, at least based on available data.
HotSoft’s limited documentation and zero reviews make it difficult to assess its real-world performance, stability, or user satisfaction. While HotSoft claims to provide comprehensive functionalities, the lack of recent support data or user feedback raises questions about its maturity. Your team needs reliable support and proven features—does HotSoft deliver on these?
If your hotel requires a feature-rich, regionally supported PMS with a proven track record, go with CiHMS. Its extensive modules—including a booking engine, revenue management, integrated CRS, and mobile app—serve hotels that need flexibility and automation. For hotel groups or resorts aiming to optimize multi-channel reservations and streamline operations across multiple properties, CiHMS is the clear fit.
If your hotel is smaller, less regionally focused, or seeking a straightforward, possibly less expensive solution without a proven review history, HotSoft might be worth exploring. However, the absence of recent user feedback and features makes it a riskier choice. For now, CiHMS’s maturity and support make it the safer investment.
CiHMS’s user rating of 4.9/5 and onboarding score of 4.84/5 reflect a highly intuitive interface and positive initial setup experience. Users praise its lean, straightforward UI and comprehensive support during onboarding, which speeds up staff adoption.
In contrast, HotSoft offers no available user ratings or onboarding insights. Without evidence of ease of use or support quality, it’s difficult to assess whether HotSoft’s interface is user-friendly or how quickly staff can learn it. Based on current data, Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS boasts 33 exclusive features, including a spa & wellness module, channel manager, revenue management, integrated CRS, booking engine, and advanced reporting tools like RevPaR & ADR reports. It also supports automation with features such as automated night audits, real-time status updates, digital registration, and multi-currency support.
HotSoft’s feature count remains unspecified, with no verified unique functionalities documented. The absence of detailed modules or capabilities makes it impossible to compare directly. Given CiHMS’s extensive feature set, the edge clearly goes to CiHMS.
CiHMS maintains a support rating of 4.92/5, with reviews highlighting professional, timely assistance and a dedicated support team. Guests appreciate the personalized support, especially during onboarding.
HotSoft’s support data is unavailable, and no reviews or feedback indicate its support quality. Without user insights, HotSoft’s support remains unverified. Based on current evidence, the edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS integrates with three verified partners, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, enabling seamless connection with major distribution channels and vendors. This integration ecosystem benefits hotels seeking a connected management environment.
HotSoft provides no publicly verified integrations or partner details, making it difficult to determine its connectivity options. Without confirmed integrations, it’s likely less adaptable. Therefore, Edge: CiHMS.
With 101 reviews and recent feedback, CiHMS scores an impressive 81.25 HTR score, a 4.92/5 customer support rating, and a 98% likelihood to recommend. Its review data covers multiple segments, including resorts, city hotels, and branded properties, confirming broad satisfaction.
HotSoft lacks any reviews or recent ratings, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment. The absence of feedback means CiHMS’s reputation is the more reliable indicator of hotel satisfaction. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no free trial or hidden fees, making it transparent and predictable. There’s no available pricing information for HotSoft, which suggests it may vary significantly or lack public pricing.
Without clear HotSoft pricing details, CiHMS’s transparent costs offer better planning certainty. For hotels requiring predictable expenses and proven value, CiHMS’s pricing model is advantageous.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, low-cost system or operate in regions where CiHMS does not have a presence.
Not ideal if you require proven support, recent user reviews, or regional presence, especially in Asia or Africa.
CiHMS stands out with its proven track record, comprehensive feature set, and high user satisfaction. It’s especially suited for hotels needing advanced modules, multi-region support, and reliable customer service—clear advantages for larger or multi-property brands.
HotSoft, while promoted as a versatile solution, suffers from a lack of recent reviews, documented features, and support data. Its potential might suit smaller hotels or those willing to take a calculated risk, but the absence of evidence puts it at a disadvantage.
In summary, if you prioritize stability, features, and proven support, CiHMS is the recommended choice. For hotels willing to explore new options without substantial supporting data, HotSoft could be considered, but with caution.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
HOIST GROUP | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CiHMS 和 HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|---|
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 21 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。HOIST GROUP - HotSoft:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,HOIST GROUP 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问