The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 178 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CiHMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) .
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and On premise.
基于 HTR 上 178 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 120 | 58 |
在分析了 178 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 Maestro PMS 用户则强调 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | #41 7 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | #18 35 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | #12 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | #10 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | #25 26 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | #20 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | #38 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #65 0 条评价 | #12 53 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #58 2 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's day-to-day operations and long-term growth. Both CiHMS by CiHMS and Maestro PMS (Northwind) serve similar functions—streamlining reservations, billing, and guest management—but they cater to different needs and hotel profiles. With CiHMS boasting more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, it’s clear that it currently holds the edge for hoteliers seeking a user-friendly, well-supported platform.
The decision ultimately hinges on your specific property type, regional focus, and feature requirements. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s unique demands?
Both CiHMS and Maestro PMS aim to improve operational efficiency, but their core strengths differ. CiHMS, developed in Vietnam, is a cloud-based platform with a focus on automation, multi-channel integration, and real-time data, primarily serving properties in Asia Pacific, the Middle East, and Africa. Maestro PMS, in contrast, is a longstanding, more extensive system with over 20 integrated modules, supporting multi-property groups and luxury resorts mainly in North America and Europe.
While CiHMS has a lower total feature count—none exclusive—the platform’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, excellent support, and strong ROI. Maestro, with a broader set of features, excels in customization and deep integrations but faces criticism for its dated UI and complexity. Do you prioritize modern usability or extensive, customizable modules?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based platform that minimizes operational time and offers real-time access, CiHMS is the better choice. It’s especially suited for hotels that value high support levels, quick onboarding, and simple integration with sales channels.
However, if your property has complex needs requiring extensive modules—like guest communication, mobile check-in, or detailed reporting—and you operate in North America or Europe, Maestro PMS’s comprehensive suite might serve you better. For multi-property groups or luxury resorts with diverse operational demands, Maestro’s customization and module variety provide an advantage.
Hoteliers seeking modern, easy-to-use software should lean toward CiHMS, while those needing deep customization and multi-module support should consider Maestro. Which features are most critical for your hotel’s success?
CiHMS’s user experience scores a notable 4.9/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, stability, and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight its lean UI and ease of access from any device, making staff adoption and daily operations smoother.
Maestro PMS scores a 4.04/5, with reviews indicating its modules are somewhat cumbersome, requiring multiple clicks and screens. Users appreciate its support but note that navigating the system can be slow, especially for newer staff members.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers a core set of features focused on reservation management, rate plan flexibility, and multi-channel integration. It does not currently have exclusive features in the source data but provides a comprehensive management system tailored to streamlining operations.
Maestro PMS, with 25 exclusive features, outshines CiHMS in areas like payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in/out, guest messaging, mobile apps, and automated reminders. It boasts a total of 58 features, making it more comprehensive for properties requiring advanced functionalities.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
CiHMS’s support ratings are exceptional at 4.92/5, with reviews emphasizing professional, responsive service and quick issue resolution. Hoteliers praise their ability to support remote work and complex integrations.
Maestro PMS also scores well at 4.78/5, with users appreciating its 24/7 support and the availability of online chat and email. Reviewers mention the support team’s effectiveness but also note that some wish for more detailed help menus.
Edge: CiHMS.
Maestro PMS boasts 89 verified partners, significantly more than CiHMS’s 3. Shared integrations include SiteMinder and Easyway, with Maestro offering additional unique partners like Criton, Zaplox, and Inntopia. Its extensive partner network supports broad operational needs.
CiHMS’s fewer integrations may limit flexibility but still cover essential channels. If integration breadth is crucial, Maestro’s larger ecosystem gives it a clear advantage.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Among the 101 recent reviews, CiHMS’s high ratings—especially its 81+ HTR Score and 98% likelihood to recommend—show strong user satisfaction, mainly in Asia-Pacific regions. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and operational efficiencies.
Maestro, with 56 reviews and a 70+ HTR Score, garners positive feedback but less so in recent periods. Its UI and complexity receive some criticism, though its versatility remains appreciated.
Edge: CiHMS.
Both products are priced at a base fee of $900, with no mention of additional implementation fees, freemium options, or monthly per-room charges. Pricing appears straightforward, but detailed costs for larger implementations or add-ons are not provided.
Not ideal if you require extensive modules like guest CRM, online check-in, or sophisticated guest messaging.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simpler, more modern UI or operates primarily outside North America and Europe.
CiHMS’s core strength lies in its simplicity, support, and regional focus, making it an excellent fit for properties that want a cloud-based, easy-to-learn system. Its recent surge in positive reviews underscores its value proposition.
Maestro PMS, with its extensive modules and integration options, targets multi-property, high-end, or highly customizable hotels. While it offers more features, its older UI and complexity might hinder smaller or less tech-savvy properties.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, support, and regional support, CiHMS is the clear pick. For large, complex operations with a need for deep customization, Maestro offers a broader feature set—though it may require more training and adaptation.
In Summary:
Note: Given the higher review count and recent positive feedback, CiHMS currently holds the advantage for hotels wanting a reliable, user-friendly property management platform.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CiHMS 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享 33 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 提供 89 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。Maestro PMS (Northwind):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,Maestro PMS 的为 70。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问