The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 35 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Civitfun 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Easy Room Selection.
LIKE MAGIC 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Pre-regisration info collection and Collect Deposits.
基于 HTR 上 35 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $200/mo | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 6 | 29 |
在分析了 35 条经验证的评价后,Civitfun 用户最看重其 ,而 LIKE MAGIC 用户则强调 宾客旅程应用程序, 自动化与集成, 非接触式办理登机手续。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
宾客旅程应用程序
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化与集成
▾
|
|
|
+
非接触式办理登机手续
▾
|
|
|
+
设计灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
收入机会
▾
|
|
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
|
−
推送通知延迟
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #7 12 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 3 条评价 | #7 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #8 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #11 6 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #25 0 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #18 1 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #5 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #17 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #12 4 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 中东 | #7 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right contactless check-in system for your hotel hinges on understanding their core strengths and limitations. Civitfun aims to automate the guest journey from check-in to check-out, primarily targeting a broad range of property types with a focus on operational efficiency. LIKE MAGIC, by contrast, emphasizes elevating guest experiences through personalized, seamless interactions that span the entire guest journey. Both aim to modernize hospitality but differ significantly in approach and maturity.
While Civitfun offers a more established, multi-region presence with a larger integration network, LIKE MAGIC provides a more feature-rich, user-friendly experience with recent reviews and higher guest satisfaction scores. The decision depends on whether you prioritize proven stability or a more innovative, guest-centric platform.
Civitfun and LIKE MAGIC both address the need for contactless check-in and operational automation, but they diverge in scope and market presence. Civitfun has been around since 2014, offering extensive integrations across multiple continents and a broad hotel segment focus, particularly in Europe and the Americas. Its review volume (4 reviews) is small, and recent feedback is absent, which makes assessing current performance difficult.
LIKE MAGIC, founded in 2023, has garnered 29 reviews, with 2 in the last six months, showing recent user engagement. Its reviews reveal high satisfaction, especially with ease of use and guest experience, and a 99% likelihood of recommendation. Do you prefer a platform with extensive historical data or one with more recent, positive user feedback?
If your hotel needs a reliable, multi-region solution with broad PMS and door system integrations, Civitfun might suit your operational needs. It’s particularly well-suited to properties that value automation, like city center hotels or budget hotels, with a focus on efficiency and reducing front desk workload.
If your priority is elevating guest experience through a simple, engaging interface and personalized interactions, LIKE MAGIC is the better pick. It’s ideal for extended stay, serviced apartments, or boutique hotels seeking to implement self-service, digital keys, and upsell opportunities. For hotels prioritizing guest satisfaction and recent positive feedback, LIKE MAGIC clearly has the edge.
Civitfun’s UI scores 4/5, with onboarding rated at 5/5, suggesting a straightforward setup. However, no recent reviews make it hard to gauge current user experience or staff adoption. Feedback indicates some clients are dissatisfied with transparency and support issues, with a notable negative review highlighting poor post-sale communication.
LIKE MAGIC scores an impressive 4.9/5 for ease of use, with onboarding rated at 4.78/5. Recent reviews praise its intuitive interface, quick implementation, and guest-friendly design. Users describe it as “super easy” and appreciate how it simplifies both staff workflows and guest interactions.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Civitfun offers 14 shared features plus one exclusive feature: easy room selection. Its unique features include automation tools that facilitate check-in, check-out, and room access. It integrates with over 50 PMS, payment gateways, and door systems, making it versatile for various property types.
LIKE MAGIC provides 14 shared features plus three unique functionalities: pre-registration info collection, deposit collection, and registration card e-signature. It also supports digital keys, personalized guest messaging, upselling, and a guest journey app, making it more feature-rich for enhancing guest experience and operational flexibility.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Civitfun has a support rating of 4/5, with reviews indicating some difficulties after the initial sale, including unavailability of contacts and lack of transparency, which could hinder onboarding or ongoing support.
LIKE MAGIC’s support is rated 4.83/5, with reviews emphasizing prompt, attentive assistance. Clients appreciate the quick response and proactive support, especially during implementation, and describe LIKE MAGIC’s team as “very responsive” and “dedicated to customer success.”
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Civitfun boasts 21 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Cloudbeds, RMS, and Stripe, along with popular door access systems and booking platforms. Its broad partner network makes it more adaptable across diverse operational environments.
LIKE MAGIC has 10 verified integrations, including PMS systems like Triptease and TrustYou, and digital key providers such as Adyen. While fewer in number, its integrations are generally focused on enhancing guest experience and operational automation.
Edge: Civitfun.
Based on the limited review data, Civitfun averages 0/5, with four reviews, all from hotels that express dissatisfaction, including issues with transparency and support. The lack of recent reviews undermines confidence in its current performance.
LIKE MAGIC, with 29 reviews and two in the last six months, enjoys a high rating of 74/100 in the HT Score and a 99% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong recent performance. Hotels across various segments, especially those focused on guest experience and operational efficiency, rate LIKE MAGIC highly.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Civitfun charges a base price of $200 with no mention of monthly fees, freemium options, or trial periods. Its pricing seems straightforward but may lack transparency regarding additional costs or custom quotes.
LIKE MAGIC costs $700 upfront, with no ongoing monthly fees or trials. Its higher price point suggests a more comprehensive platform, but the absence of trial or flexible pricing limits experimentation before commitment.
Not ideal if your hotel needs highly personalized guest interactions, real-time analytics, or a focus on guest engagement.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive custom branding, offline functionality, or detailed analytics.
Civitfun offers a reliable, established solution with a focus on automating check-in and check-out across multiple regions. If your hotel values broad integrations, automation, and a lower-cost option, it’s a viable choice, but recent reviews and support experiences are less positive.
LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, leads with guest experience and ease of use, with a strong recent review presence and a high likelihood of recommendation. It’s ideal if your hotel prioritizes guest engagement, digital interaction, and modern self-service features.
For properties seeking proven stability and extensive integrations, Civitfun might be appropriate. However, if your goal is a modern, guest-centric platform with excellent recent feedback, LIKE MAGIC is the clear winner.
Final note: Given the more recent reviews, higher user satisfaction, and a significant number of positive feedbacks, LIKE MAGIC stands out as the stronger choice for hotels looking to enhance guest interactions and operational efficiency today.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $700/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Civitfun 和 LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 共享 14 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 收取押金 | ||
| 登记卡电子签名 | ||
| 轻松选择房间 | ||
| 预注册信息收集 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了... 宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了宾客体验。
用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验... 用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验。
LikeMagic 的非接触式入住服务备受赞誉,提升了宾客的便利性,并减少了前台的拥挤。宾客可以通过手机办理入住,流程快捷卫生,尤其受到国际旅客的青睐。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
LikeMagic 以通过客房升级和套餐附加服务等功能提升增值收入而闻名。该平台整合了延迟退房或客房送餐等附加服务,为提升收入提供了宝贵的机会。
人们经常提到需要更全面的分析和报告功能。用户表示希望拥有能够追踪宾客参与度并提供关键绩效指标的高级模块,从而更好地做出决策并改进服务。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Civitfun 和 LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。Civitfun 提供 21 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 提供 10 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Civitfun:否。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Civitfun 的 HT Score 为 0,LIKE MAGIC 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问