The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 254 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Feedback Management and Payment Requests.
innRoad 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
在分析了 254 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 innRoad 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 预订管理, 客户支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
+
自定义报告
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
系统性能和更新
▾
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
−
自定义报告
▾
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
−
定制
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | #7 101 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | #10 36 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #5 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #6 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | #8 70 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #9 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | #11 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | #12 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | #6 166 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #21 4 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #12 4 条评价 | #21 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #18 2 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and innRoad All-in-1 HMS by innRoad depends heavily on your hotel’s specific needs and scale. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. As your trusted advisor, I will help you evaluate which software aligns best with your hotel’s size, segment, and operational goals.
Clock offers a more comprehensive suite of features, a broader global reach, and higher user ratings, especially in recent reviews. innRoad, while simpler and more focused on independent hotels, is renowned for ease of use and strong support but has fewer features and lower recent review scores. Which one will serve your team better?
Both Clock and innRoad aim to simplify hotel management but approach it differently. Clock provides a wide array of features including POS, guest feedback, automated reminders, and multi-lingual support, making it suitable for hotels with complex operations or those seeking an all-in-one solution. innRoad specializes in reservation management, channel integration, and direct booking tools, primarily serving independent hotels that prioritize ease of use and incremental growth.
Clock boasts a higher overall rating of 4.88/5 based on 63 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability and feature richness. innRoad’s ratings sit at 4.72/5 from 148 reviews, but recent reviews show a dip in satisfaction, especially around system speed and UI. With more recent data, Clock’s higher score makes it the more reliable choice for hotels wanting a mature, feature-rich platform ready for complex needs.
Are you prioritizing extensive features and global support, or are you looking for a straightforward system that increases bookings and supports growth?
If your hotel operates at a larger scale or requires extensive features like POS, payment automation, multi-lingual support, and advanced guest feedback, Clock is the clear pick. Its broad feature set (10 unique features) and higher review count (63 vs. 148) make it suitable for boutique, city center, or resorts that need integrated solutions.
If, however, your hotel is independent, smaller, or primarily focused on increasing direct bookings with simplified reservation management and channel connectivity, innRoad’s ease of use and support are beneficial. Its strength lies in its reservation engine, channel management, and lower complexity, aligning well with budget or limited-service properties.
In conclusion, choose Clock if your operation demands a full-featured, multi-market platform. Pick innRoad if your focus is on increasing occupancy with straightforward, reliable tools.
Clock’s user interface has a rating of 4.73/5, praised for its straightforward navigation, but some users note it requires a learning curve, mainly due to its comprehensive feature set. The onboarding process scores 4.71/5, with a few reviews mentioning initial setup complexity, though support helps mitigate this.
innRoad scores slightly lower for ease of use at 4.47/5, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Support for innRoad is highly rated, and many users find their system simple enough for staff with little prior experience.
Edge: innRoad.
Clock offers 10 features exclusive to its platform, including POS, pricing intelligence, guest feedback management, multi-lingual support, and rules-based room assignments. Its total of 49 features (shared + unique) makes it a highly versatile system suitable for hotels with complex needs.
innRoad provides 38 unique features, including website development, online booking engine, channel management, and integrated payment processing. It excels in streamlining booking and reservation workflows but has fewer advanced features compared to Clock.
Edge: Clock.
Clock’s customer support scores 4.78/5, with reviews praising its quick, responsive service and support team’s technical expertise. Many users mention that Clock’s support helps resolve setup and system issues efficiently, even if some note occasional delays with complex queries.
innRoad’s support scores 4.48/5, with reviewers describing their team as knowledgeable and always available. However, some reviews mention occasional delays in resolution and room for more proactive communication.
Edge: Clock.
Clock’s integration count stands at 111 verified partners, vastly outpacing innRoad’s 34. Shared integrations include major OTAs and revenue management tools like Profitroom, Revinate, and TripAdvisor. Clock’s open API and extensive partner network provide more flexibility and options for connecting your existing systems.
innRoad’s integrations are primarily with booking engines and payment processors, with fewer third-party options. Its focus is on core reservation and channel management, making it less suited for hotels needing a broad ecosystem.
Edge: Clock.
Clock's recent reviews lead with a 95% likelihood to recommend, and overall ratings of 4.88/5. Hoteliers from boutique and independent segments particularly appreciate its reliability, ease of access, and advanced features.
innRoad’s ratings are slightly lower at 4.72/5, with some recent reviews indicating frustrations with system speed and UI, particularly among smaller properties. Its customers often praise support but note that the platform could benefit from more features.
Edge: Clock.
Both Clock and innRoad are priced at a base of $600/month, with no freemium or monthly per-room charges listed. This straightforward pricing makes budgeting easier, but it’s important to confirm any additional costs for integrations or advanced features directly with vendors.
Clock offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform that suits larger, more complex hotels seeking extensive integrations, analytics, and automation. Its higher review scores, recent positive feedback, and broader global support make it the more dependable choice for properties with diverse needs.
innRoad excels in ease of use, support, and a focus on increasing bookings and occupancy for independent hotels. Its streamlined features are perfect if your hotel values simplicity and quick setup over advanced functionalities.
For hotels requiring a robust, scalable system with extensive integrations and features, Clock is the clear winner. If your property’s needs are more basic, aiming to grow bookings without complexity, innRoad remains a solid, user-friendly option.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然 Innroad 总体上是用户友好的,但 UI 和导航等某些方面可以更加直观。这些方面的改进将使新用户受益,并使日常操作更加高效。
Innroad 直观的预订管理系统简化了整个预订流程。它提供全面的数据访问,使员工能够高效地处理多房间预订和客人信息。
24/7 客户支持因其可用性和所提供帮助的质量而受到称赞。然而,一些用户报告称,偶尔会遇到沟通和解决速度方面的困难。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户提到频繁更新有时会降低系统性能,影响生产力。尽管更新带来好处,但建议更高效地推出并尽量减少干扰。
一些评论呼吁改进自定义报告功能。用户建议提供更详细、可自定义的报告选项,以便更深入地了解客户行为和运营指标。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。innRoad All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79,innRoad 的为 27。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问