The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 106 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 Noovy 用户则强调 易于使用, 通道连通性, 一体化功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
+
通道连通性
▾
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
+
一体化功能
▾
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | #27 13 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | #19 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #17 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #15 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | #21 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #34 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | #33 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | #28 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #12 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #12 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #18 2 条评价 | #11 2 条评价 |
Your hotel management system needs to streamline operations, boost revenue, and improve guest experiences—all without complicating staff workflows. Clock HMS by Clock and Noovy by Noovy both promise to meet these goals, but they differ in maturity, feature set, and user feedback. With Clock having more recent reviews and a broader client base, it's important to compare their strengths and weaknesses to see which suits your hotel best.
Are you looking for a well-established platform with extensive integrations, or a newer, all-in-one system designed for simplicity? Let’s evaluate how these two products stack up.
Clock HMS offers a comprehensive hotel management platform with a long history, extensive features, and more reviews—over 60—with recent feedback from active users. Its broad integration network and detailed analytics make it ideal for hotels needing a robust, customizable solution. Conversely, Noovy is a newer entrant, with just 21 reviews, but it emphasizes simplicity and affordability, offering an all-in-one system with fewer features but high user satisfaction.
Where Clock excels is in its depth of features, including revenue management, guest feedback, and ancillary revenue tracking, making it suitable for hotels with complex operations. Noovy, on the other hand, focuses on ease of use, automation, and cost-effectiveness, appealing to hotels wanting a straightforward, connected platform. Which factors matter most for your hotel’s growth?
If your hotel needs a mature system with proven reliability, extensive integrations, and dedicated revenue tools, Clock is the clear choice. Its large user base and recent, detailed reviews give confidence in its stability and ongoing support.
If your priority is a budget-friendly, user-friendly system that consolidates PMS, channel management, and booking engine into one platform, Noovy is better suited. Its streamlined approach is ideal for smaller hotels or those new to digital management, especially if quick onboarding and automation are key.
For a property that relies heavily on customized reporting, dynamic pricing, and in-depth guest feedback, Clock’s feature set makes it the more suitable solution. Conversely, if simplicity and cost savings are your main concerns, Noovy provides an attractive alternative.
Clock HMS boasts a high usability rating of 4.73/5 from over 60 reviews, with users citing its straightforward, cloud-based interface and excellent support. Many mention that staff adoption was smooth, and onboarding is typically rated 4.71/5, though some note initial setup complexity.
Noovy, rated 4.62/5 with 21 reviews, is praised for its intuitive design and ease of navigation. Users highlight that connecting with distribution channels and making reservations involve just a few clicks, speeding up staff training.
Edge: Clock HMS — its larger review base and slightly higher usability score reflect greater confidence in user experience, especially for larger properties or those with complex workflows.
Clock offers 49 features, with 6 exclusive to its platform, including guest feedback management, gift vouchers, guest app, shift planning, ancillary revenue tracking, and SOC2 compliance. Its comprehensive suite supports reservations, invoicing, online check-in, restaurant POS, and detailed analytics.
Noovy provides 43 features, including native email marketing, revenue management, automated night audit, guest CRM, SMS messaging, and a mobile app. Its focus is on automation and connectivity, but it lacks some of Clock’s specialized guest engagement tools.
While Clock’s additional features cater to larger, more complex operations, Noovy’s core modules deliver an all-in-one experience suited for streamlined management. Which feature set aligns with your operational priorities?
Edge: Clock HMS — with more unique features and a broader suite, Clock is better suited for hotels seeking advanced capabilities and detailed guest engagement tools.
Clock’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.78/5, with reviews praising quick, responsive service and knowledgeable staff. Users appreciate that Clock’s support team helps navigate setup complexities and ongoing issues effectively.
Noovy’s support, rated 4.71/5, is described as friendly, helpful, and reliable. Several users note that support responsiveness and communication are excellent, though fewer reviews make this comparison less conclusive.
Edge: Clock HMS — its larger review volume and marginally higher rating indicate stronger confidence in ongoing support and issue resolution.
Clock boasts 111 verified partners, including major OTAs, CRM, and analytics providers, with 20 shared integrations with Noovy. Notable exclusive integrations include Curacity, HQ revenue, and Profitroom, offering extensive connectivity.
Noovy has 40 verified partners, including Omnibees, HotelTime, and Otelier, focusing on essential OTAs and payment gateways. Its integrations are fewer but cover the critical channels for small to mid-sized hotels.
If your hotel relies on a complex tech stack or industry-specific integrations, Clock’s broader network offers more flexibility. For simpler needs, Noovy provides enough connectivity at a lower complexity level.
Edge: Clock HMS — more integrations mean greater scalability and customization, ideal for hotels with diverse systems.
Clock’s overall rating of 4.88/5 is based on 63 reviews, with recent feedback confirming ongoing satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and independent hotels, rate it highly for its functionality and support.
Noovy’s perfect 5/5 rating from 21 reviews indicates strong satisfaction, particularly among smaller hotels and properties seeking simplicity. However, its fewer reviews and limited recent feedback suggest less stable data.
Given the larger, more recent review base, Clock receives stronger endorsement from hoteliers overall.
Edge: Clock HMS — the higher review count and recent positive feedback reinforce its reliability and value.
Both Clock and Noovy are priced at $600 per month, with no freemium or tiered pricing plans. This flat-rate model simplifies budgeting but may be less flexible for smaller properties or those seeking modular features.
There are no implementation fees or trial options listed, so your team should confirm details before committing.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal staff, or prefers a simple, lightweight platform.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue management, detailed guest engagement, or extensive custom integrations.
Clock HMS stands out as the more mature, feature-rich platform with a large, active user base and more recent reviews. Its deep integration options and specialized tools make it suitable for hotels with complex operations that need detailed analytics and guest feedback management.
Noovy offers a simpler, more affordable all-in-one solution tailored for smaller hotels or properties that value ease of use and automation. Its high user satisfaction and straightforward features make it a compelling choice for properties prioritizing quick setup and operational efficiency.
If your hotel is ready to scale with a proven, feature-heavy platform, Clock is the stronger candidate. For hotels seeking a user-friendly, budget-conscious system that consolidates essential functions, Noovy is a solid alternative.
In conclusion, for hotels seeking reliability, depth, and extensive integrations, Clock HMS is the better choice. If simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and quick onboarding matter most, Noovy delivers high satisfaction with fewer complexities.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
人们经常提到该软件的用户友好界面和对新员工的易于培训的特点,这使得它甚至适合那些技术背景较少的员工。
HotelConnect 与 Booking.com 和 Expedia 等 OTA 的直接连接被视为一大优势,简化了分销并消除了渠道经理成本。
用户非常欣赏 HotelConnect 将 PMS、渠道管理器、预订引擎、收入管理和客户沟通整合到一个平台,减少了对多个系统的需求并降低了成本。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
与收入管理相关的功能,包括详细的报告工具和费率日历,因有助于优化酒店收入而受到赞赏。
其中提到了一些翻译问题,特别是英语以外的语言,造成了一些不便。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 Noovy 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。Noovy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79,Noovy 的为 64。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问