The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,481 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易于使用,快速上手, 客户支持和培训, integrated all-in-one operations,而 HotelKey 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用,快速上手
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持和培训
▾
|
|
|
+
Integrated all-in-one operations
▾
|
|
|
+
频道管理器和OTA同步
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析深度
▾
|
|
|
−
预订编辑和工作流程灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用和通知
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #34 4 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #21 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #32 4 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | #23 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | #16 15 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #37 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and HotelKey HMS boils down to understanding what your hotel needs most. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, highly-rated platform with a broad feature set, while HotelKey focuses on enterprise clients, emphasizing streamlined operations for larger chains. Both platforms aim to improve efficiency, but they serve different hotel segments and operational complexities—so which is the right fit for your property?
Cloudbeds is designed to serve a wide range of properties, from boutique hotels to hostels, with a strong emphasis on ease of use and flexible integrations. HotelKey, on the other hand, is tailored for larger enterprise chains, offering robust, scalable management tools with a focus on centralized control. Are you prioritizing a user-friendly, all-in-one platform or a more enterprise-grade solution?
Cloudbeds consistently receives more recent reviews—76 in the last six months compared to HotelKey’s zero—and outperforms in overall ratings (4.62/5 vs. 0/5). Hotels praise Cloudbeds for its intuitive interface, automation, and extensive integrations, making daily management easier. HotelKey’s reviews are scarce and less current, with users highlighting its reliability but offering little recent feedback on usability or support.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but Cloudbeds’ broader feature set (51 exclusive features vs. HotelKey’s 8) offers more tools for managing reservations, revenue, and guest experience. HotelKey’s simplicity appeals to large chains needing reliable, centralized control, but the lack of recent reviews raises questions about its current performance. Do you need a platform with proven recent success or a scalable system for large operations?
If your hotel is a small to midsize property that values ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations, Cloudbeds is the stronger choice. Its rating (4.62/5) and review count (1,219) reflect broad satisfaction across diverse property types, especially in boutique, hostel, and independent segments.
If you operate a large enterprise chain with complex operations requiring centralized control and enterprise-grade features, HotelKey’s scalability and client roster—featuring Hilton and Red Roof Inn—make it worth considering. However, its limited recent review activity suggests less current user feedback and potentially less agility in addressing evolving hotel needs.
For most hoteliers in the market today, Cloudbeds offers a more validated, accessible platform. Are you seeking a versatile solution with recent user approval, or a specialized enterprise system with a limited public record?
Cloudbeds scores a 4.58/5 for ease of use, with many recent reviews praising its intuitive, user-friendly interface. Users cite quick onboarding, minimal staff training, and seamless daily operations, with comments like “it really feels like a PMS for today's age” and “the system is very easy to navigate.”
HotelKey, rated at 4.29/5, also receives positive remarks for its simplicity, especially among enterprise clients. However, its smaller review base and lack of recent feedback limit insights into current usability. Based on available data, Cloudbeds’ larger, more recent review pool suggests its interface is more familiar and easier for hotel staff to adopt. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 51 exclusive features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, multi-channel distribution, revenue management, automated reports, and guest communication tools. Its features support a comprehensive management approach, reducing manual work and boosting operational control.
HotelKey offers only 8 unique features, like guest CRM, tablet check-in, integrated ID scanner, and POS—useful but less extensive. While HotelKey’s features are aligned with larger chains needing centralized control, Cloudbeds’ broader toolkit provides more options for hoteliers seeking operational flexibility. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support scores 4.38/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, attentive service. Users describe the support team as “responsive and friendly,” helping resolve issues promptly during busy periods.
HotelKey scores slightly lower at 4/5, with feedback indicating reliable support but fewer recent comments, making it hard to gauge current responsiveness. Cloudbeds’ larger review count and recent activity suggest its support remains strong and well-validated. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds integrates with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and revenue tools, offering extensive connectivity across the industry. Shared integrations include Expedia, Cendyn, and OpenKey, with many exclusive integrations like channel self-mapping and real-time updates.
HotelKey has 31 verified partners, with fewer shared and fewer unique integrations. Its ecosystem is more limited, especially outside the U.S., and lacks the breadth of Cloudbeds’ partner network. For flexible, broad integration, Cloudbeds is clearly superior. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ recent reviews show a 4.62/5 rating, with property types like boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties rating it highly. Hoteliers in these segments praise its ease of use, automation, and customer support, often citing it as “a must-have” for daily operations.
HotelKey, with only 14 reviews, lacks recent ratings, but the few comments are positive regarding reliability for large chains. However, the limited and outdated feedback makes Cloudbeds the more trusted choice for most hoteliers today. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $500 per month without a trial—no freemium or monthly per-room fees are listed. Its transparent pricing reflects its broad feature set and flexibility for properties of various sizes.
HotelKey costs $600 per month, also without a trial or additional fees. Its higher price point may reflect its enterprise focus, but the lack of public details on features and support makes direct comparison difficult. Based on overall value and reviews, Cloudbeds appears to offer better ROI for most hotels.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if:
Edge: HotelKey.
In essence, Cloudbeds and HotelKey serve different segments with overlapping goals—streamlining hotel management and boosting revenue. Cloudbeds’s extensive, recent review activity and feature set make it the clear leader for most hotels needing a flexible, modern system.
If your hotel values a highly-rated, easy-to-use platform that integrates broad functionalities, Cloudbeds should be your choice—especially given its proven recent success across diverse property types. HotelKey’s strength lies in enterprise control for large chains, but its limited recent feedback suggests it may lack the agility and broader support most hotels now require.
For properties seeking a trusted, adaptable solution that’s actively validated by recent users, Cloudbeds emerges as the definitive recommendation.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 系统因其直观易用、界面简洁、便于员工快速上手而广受好评,这不仅缩短了培训时间,也帮助酒店轻松上手。评论者普遍认为,这种简洁性有助于提高运营的... Cloudbeds 系统因其直观易用、界面简洁、便于员工快速上手而广受好评,这不仅缩短了培训时间,也帮助酒店轻松上手。评论者普遍认为,这种简洁性有助于提高运营的一致性,尤其对于规模较小的团队和多地点运营商而言更是如此。
用户普遍认为客服响应迅速、知识渊博且乐于助人,其中在线聊天和新手引导服务尤为突出。与此同时,也有不少用户希望问题能够更快得到解决,获得更多人工服务,以... 用户普遍认为客服响应迅速、知识渊博且乐于助人,其中在线聊天和新手引导服务尤为突出。与此同时,也有不少用户希望问题能够更快得到解决,获得更多人工服务,以及更完善的产品内培训或针对新房源或复杂房源设置的专门指导。
A central theme is that Cloudbeds replaces multiple disconnected tools by combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, payments, guest data, and... A central theme is that Cloudbeds replaces multiple disconnected tools by combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, payments, guest data, and other workflows in one system. Buyers value this because it cuts manual work, improves coordination, and lets staff spend more time on guests instead of system juggling.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多评论者赞赏 Cloudbeds 提供的全面运营和财务报告,这些报告能够支持管理决策、入住率跟踪和收入监管。然而,他们也经常要求提供更多定制化功能、更快的下载... 许多评论者赞赏 Cloudbeds 提供的全面运营和财务报告,这些报告能够支持管理决策、入住率跟踪和收入监管。然而,他们也经常要求提供更多定制化功能、更快的下载速度、更完善的仪表盘和更清晰的财务视图,尤其是在会计核算、多物业管理或多币种需求方面。
用户喜欢拆分预订、更改未来日期、更改房间以及集中式预订管理等功能,但他们也指出,当编辑操作变得复杂或需要点击次数过多时,会造成不便。许多评论都要求改进... 用户喜欢拆分预订、更改未来日期、更改房间以及集中式预订管理等功能,但他们也指出,当编辑操作变得复杂或需要点击次数过多时,会造成不便。许多评论都要求改进拖放操作的安全性、更灵活的拆分预订功能、更完善的账单管理以及更清晰的紧急操作变更控制。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 HotelKey HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 200 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelKey HMS 提供 31 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。HotelKey HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,HotelKey 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案