项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,735 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 日历和预订概览 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
innRoad 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Ancillary revenue tracking.
在分析了 1,735 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 日历和预订概览, 报告与分析, 渠道管理和ota分销,而 innRoad 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 预订管理, 客户支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
日历和预订概览
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理和OTA分销
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
客人数据与CRM
▾
|
+
自定义报告
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持响应速度和联系方式
▾
|
−
系统性能和更新
▾
|
|
−
移动应用限制
▾
|
−
自定义报告
▾
|
|
−
支付处理与账单管理
▾
|
−
定制
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #7 101 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #10 36 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | #5 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #6 4 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #8 70 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #9 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | #11 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | #12 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | #6 166 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #21 4 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | #21 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can dramatically impact your operations, revenue, and guest satisfaction. Cloudbeds HMS and innRoad All-in-1 HMS are two leading solutions, but they serve slightly different needs—Cloudbeds with a broader international presence and more recent reviews, and innRoad with a solid reputation for independence and ease of use. Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Both products aim to streamline reservations, manage distribution, and improve operational efficiency. The key difference lies in their user base, feature depth, and recent performance feedback—so which one will help your team grow?
Cloudbeds and innRoad both address core hotel management needs like reservations, channel distribution, and guest engagement. Cloudbeds, with a score of 100 on HotelTechReport and over 1,200 reviews, offers a highly-rated, globally adopted platform, whereas innRoad has fewer reviews (148) with slightly higher overall ratings but less recent feedback.
While Cloudbeds emphasizes integration across operations and a unified experience, innRoad excels in simplicity and dedicated support for independent hotels. Do you prioritize a widely trusted system with extensive features or a straightforward platform with dedicated service?
If your hotel needs a versatile, scalable platform with advanced automation, revenue management, and multi-language support, Cloudbeds is the clear pick. Its larger user base—especially in boutique, hostel, and resort segments—and more recent reviews indicate a more active, evolving platform.
If your hotel is an independent property focused on ease of setup, personalized support, and cost-conscious growth, innRoad is a strong candidate. Its higher ratings in customer support and straightforward interface appeal to properties that want quick onboarding and reliable service. Which features are most critical for your growth?
Based on ratings, Cloudbeds scores 4.58/5 for ease of use, slightly above innRoad’s 4.47/5. Cloudbeds’ interface is praised for its intuitive navigation and comprehensive onboarding, with recent reviewers highlighting its user-friendly design that accommodates both tech-savvy and less experienced staff.
innRoad’s simpler interface and dedicated support make it accessible for smaller teams, but some users suggest that it could benefit from UI improvements for faster daily operation. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 66 shared features plus 24 exclusive ones—covering revenue management, group bookings, social media integration, and multi-lingual support. innRoad provides 11 unique features, including guest SMS messaging, ADA compliance, and integrated ID scanners.
While innRoad’s features are tailored to independent properties with a focus on core reservation and channel management, Cloudbeds’ larger feature set supports complex, multi-property operations. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with multiple reviews praising their fast, friendly, and attentive service, even during complex issues. Recent reviews highlight their responsiveness and proactive support, especially for larger or growing properties.
innRoad scores slightly higher at 4.48/5, with reviews emphasizing their 24/7 availability and dedicated onboarding, especially appreciated by smaller teams. However, some users note occasional delays in resolution. Edge: innRoad.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified integration partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Airbnb, and TripAdvisor, plus integrations with revenue management, POS, and other systems—ensuring comprehensive connectivity.
innRoad offers 34 verified partners, with a focus on core integrations like QuickBooks, OTAs, and credit card processors. The broader and more recent integration ecosystem favors Cloudbeds for complex, multi-channel environments. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds, with 76 recent reviews in the last 6 months, maintains a high NPS score of 8.94/10 and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its users span boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts, frequently praising its intuitiveness and comprehensive features.
innRoad has fewer recent reviews—none in the last 6 months—and a similar overall rating of 4.72/5. Its user base, mainly independent hotels, values its support and ease of setup, but the smaller sample size makes it harder to gauge current performance.
Given the more recent review activity and higher HotelTechReport score, Cloudbeds is the stronger-rated product.
Cloudbeds’ pricing starts at $500/month without a free trial, and no freemium tier is available. innRoad’s base price is $600/month, also without a free trial, making Cloudbeds marginally more affordable, especially considering its extensive features.
Pricing varies based on property size and needs, but both platforms lack transparent tiered pricing online. Your hotel should request a custom quote.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or prefers simple, standalone solutions with minimal automation.
Not ideal if your property requires extensive automation, advanced revenue management, or multi-property oversight.
Cloudbeds is a robust, global platform offering a wide array of features, integrations, and a large, active user base. Its recent reviews and high HTTR score make it the clear leader for properties looking to scale and innovate.
innRoad appeals to independent hotels seeking simplicity, dedicated support, and cost-effective solutions. Its ease of use and support make it ideal for smaller teams that want reliability without complexity.
If your hotel needs an all-encompassing, feature-rich system with continuous improvement, Cloudbeds is the definitive choice. For a straightforward, support-driven platform that gets the basics right, innRoad remains a solid option.
In conclusion, for most hotels—especially those with ambitions to grow and leverage modern tech—Cloudbeds’ extensive reviews, recent performance, and feature depth make it the recommended solution.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户通常称赞Cloudbeds提供清晰的集中式日历视图,显示入住率、房态和即将到来的预订。它帮助前台和预订团队更快地处理预订、办理入住手续,并规划当天的工作,... 用户通常称赞Cloudbeds提供清晰的集中式日历视图,显示入住率、房态和即将到来的预订。它帮助前台和预订团队更快地处理预订、办理入住手续,并规划当天的工作,减少手动核查。
评审者经常使用 Cloudbeds 进行业务报告,特别是收入、入住率和绩效分析。他们重视数据集中在一个平台,但许多用户希望拥有更具可定制性、现代化的仪表盘式报告... 评审者经常使用 Cloudbeds 进行业务报告,特别是收入、入住率和绩效分析。他们重视数据集中在一个平台,但许多用户希望拥有更具可定制性、现代化的仪表盘式报告,更快的下载速度,以及更强的财务/会计视图。
许多评论者强调,Cloudbeds实现OTA管理的集中化,确保房态和价格更新在各渠道同步,减少手动操作。多人提到这带来了错误减少、超售减少以及多渠道控制更便捷的直... 许多评论者强调,Cloudbeds实现OTA管理的集中化,确保房态和价格更新在各渠道同步,减少手动操作。多人提到这带来了错误减少、超售减少以及多渠道控制更便捷的直接运营优势。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
支持通常被描述为一旦联系就很有帮助且知识丰富,但许多评价指出对于紧急运营问题,响应时间可能较慢。买家经常要求除聊天外,还能通过电话或视频获得支持,尤其... 支持通常被描述为一旦联系就很有帮助且知识丰富,但许多评价指出对于紧急运营问题,响应时间可能较慢。买家经常要求除聊天外,还能通过电话或视频获得支持,尤其是在影响现场入住或支付的问题时。
一个反复出现的负面主题是,移动应用通常被视为只读的辅助工具,而不是完整的操作工具。用户反复请求能够在移动端创建或编辑预订、关闭房间、接收推送通知,以及... 一个反复出现的负面主题是,移动应用通常被视为只读的辅助工具,而不是完整的操作工具。用户反复请求能够在移动端创建或编辑预订、关闭房间、接收推送通知,以及执行更多日常工作流程,而无需切换到网页版。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
虽然 Innroad 总体上是用户友好的,但 UI 和导航等某些方面可以更加直观。这些方面的改进将使新用户受益,并使日常操作更加高效。
Innroad 直观的预订管理系统简化了整个预订流程。它提供全面的数据访问,使员工能够高效地处理多房间预订和客人信息。
24/7 客户支持因其可用性和所提供帮助的质量而受到称赞。然而,一些用户报告称,偶尔会遇到沟通和解决速度方面的困难。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户提到频繁更新有时会降低系统性能,影响生产力。尽管更新带来好处,但建议更高效地推出并尽量减少干扰。
一些评论呼吁改进自定义报告功能。用户建议提供更详细、可自定义的报告选项,以便更深入地了解客户行为和运营指标。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 203 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。innRoad All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,innRoad 的为 23。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐