The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,589 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
innRoad 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
在分析了 1,589 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 innRoad 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 预订管理, 客户支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
自定义报告
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
−
系统性能和更新
▾
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
−
自定义报告
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
定制
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #7 101 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #10 36 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | #5 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #6 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #8 70 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #9 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | #11 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | #12 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | #6 166 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #21 4 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | #21 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can dramatically impact your operations, revenue, and guest satisfaction. Cloudbeds HMS and innRoad All-in-1 HMS are two leading solutions, but they serve slightly different needs—Cloudbeds with a broader international presence and more recent reviews, and innRoad with a solid reputation for independence and ease of use. Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Both products aim to streamline reservations, manage distribution, and improve operational efficiency. The key difference lies in their user base, feature depth, and recent performance feedback—so which one will help your team grow?
Cloudbeds and innRoad both address core hotel management needs like reservations, channel distribution, and guest engagement. Cloudbeds, with a score of 100 on HotelTechReport and over 1,200 reviews, offers a highly-rated, globally adopted platform, whereas innRoad has fewer reviews (148) with slightly higher overall ratings but less recent feedback.
While Cloudbeds emphasizes integration across operations and a unified experience, innRoad excels in simplicity and dedicated support for independent hotels. Do you prioritize a widely trusted system with extensive features or a straightforward platform with dedicated service?
If your hotel needs a versatile, scalable platform with advanced automation, revenue management, and multi-language support, Cloudbeds is the clear pick. Its larger user base—especially in boutique, hostel, and resort segments—and more recent reviews indicate a more active, evolving platform.
If your hotel is an independent property focused on ease of setup, personalized support, and cost-conscious growth, innRoad is a strong candidate. Its higher ratings in customer support and straightforward interface appeal to properties that want quick onboarding and reliable service. Which features are most critical for your growth?
Based on ratings, Cloudbeds scores 4.58/5 for ease of use, slightly above innRoad’s 4.47/5. Cloudbeds’ interface is praised for its intuitive navigation and comprehensive onboarding, with recent reviewers highlighting its user-friendly design that accommodates both tech-savvy and less experienced staff.
innRoad’s simpler interface and dedicated support make it accessible for smaller teams, but some users suggest that it could benefit from UI improvements for faster daily operation. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 66 shared features plus 24 exclusive ones—covering revenue management, group bookings, social media integration, and multi-lingual support. innRoad provides 11 unique features, including guest SMS messaging, ADA compliance, and integrated ID scanners.
While innRoad’s features are tailored to independent properties with a focus on core reservation and channel management, Cloudbeds’ larger feature set supports complex, multi-property operations. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with multiple reviews praising their fast, friendly, and attentive service, even during complex issues. Recent reviews highlight their responsiveness and proactive support, especially for larger or growing properties.
innRoad scores slightly higher at 4.48/5, with reviews emphasizing their 24/7 availability and dedicated onboarding, especially appreciated by smaller teams. However, some users note occasional delays in resolution. Edge: innRoad.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified integration partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Airbnb, and TripAdvisor, plus integrations with revenue management, POS, and other systems—ensuring comprehensive connectivity.
innRoad offers 34 verified partners, with a focus on core integrations like QuickBooks, OTAs, and credit card processors. The broader and more recent integration ecosystem favors Cloudbeds for complex, multi-channel environments. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds, with 76 recent reviews in the last 6 months, maintains a high NPS score of 8.94/10 and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its users span boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts, frequently praising its intuitiveness and comprehensive features.
innRoad has fewer recent reviews—none in the last 6 months—and a similar overall rating of 4.72/5. Its user base, mainly independent hotels, values its support and ease of setup, but the smaller sample size makes it harder to gauge current performance.
Given the more recent review activity and higher HotelTechReport score, Cloudbeds is the stronger-rated product.
Cloudbeds’ pricing starts at $500/month without a free trial, and no freemium tier is available. innRoad’s base price is $600/month, also without a free trial, making Cloudbeds marginally more affordable, especially considering its extensive features.
Pricing varies based on property size and needs, but both platforms lack transparent tiered pricing online. Your hotel should request a custom quote.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or prefers simple, standalone solutions with minimal automation.
Not ideal if your property requires extensive automation, advanced revenue management, or multi-property oversight.
Cloudbeds is a robust, global platform offering a wide array of features, integrations, and a large, active user base. Its recent reviews and high HTTR score make it the clear leader for properties looking to scale and innovate.
innRoad appeals to independent hotels seeking simplicity, dedicated support, and cost-effective solutions. Its ease of use and support make it ideal for smaller teams that want reliability without complexity.
If your hotel needs an all-encompassing, feature-rich system with continuous improvement, Cloudbeds is the definitive choice. For a straightforward, support-driven platform that gets the basics right, innRoad remains a solid option.
In conclusion, for most hotels—especially those with ambitions to grow and leverage modern tech—Cloudbeds’ extensive reviews, recent performance, and feature depth make it the recommended solution.
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds HMS 和 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 共享 66 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 通道自映射 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 23 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然 Innroad 总体上是用户友好的,但 UI 和导航等某些方面可以更加直观。这些方面的改进将使新用户受益,并使日常操作更加高效。
Innroad 直观的预订管理系统简化了整个预订流程。它提供全面的数据访问,使员工能够高效地处理多房间预订和客人信息。
24/7 客户支持因其可用性和所提供帮助的质量而受到称赞。然而,一些用户报告称,偶尔会遇到沟通和解决速度方面的困难。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户提到频繁更新有时会降低系统性能,影响生产力。尽管更新带来好处,但建议更高效地推出并尽量减少干扰。
一些评论呼吁改进自定义报告功能。用户建议提供更详细、可自定义的报告选项,以便更深入地了解客户行为和运营指标。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。innRoad All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,innRoad 的为 27。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问