The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,436 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
MISTER BOOKING 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 1,436 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,414 | 22 |
在分析了 1,436 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 MISTER BOOKING 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #25 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #24 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #28 6 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #25 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | #27 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #11 19 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Misterbooking hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline operations and increase bookings, but Cloudbeds offers a broader set of features with a well-established reputation backed by more recent reviews. Misterbooking, while slightly less comprehensive, provides a cost-effective, scalable solution with high customer satisfaction, particularly for independent properties.
Considering the volume of recent feedback, which platform aligns better with your strategic goals and operational scale?
Both Cloudbeds and Misterbooking aim to simplify hotel management by centralizing reservations, operations, and distribution channels. Cloudbeds, founded in 2012, is the most reviewed and awarded platform, boasting a 100/100 score on HotelTechReport and over 1,200 reviews, most recent ones within the last six months. Misterbooking, established in 2003, has a smaller footprint with only 21 reviews, but these are all recent and highly positive, giving it a 4.83/5 overall rating.
Cloudbeds’ extensive feature set includes integrations with revenue management, analytics, and a highly scalable PMS, making it suitable for properties aiming to grow or optimize complex operations. Misterbooking, with fewer features but a responsive interface, appeals to independent hotels seeking a straightforward, budget-friendly system with high customer satisfaction.
Are you prioritizing a proven, feature-rich platform with global support, or a lean, efficient system that’s easy to implement and manage?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated platform that handles reservations, channel management, revenue optimization, and guest engagement at scale, Cloudbeds is the better choice. Its broad partner network and multi-lingual, multi-currency support make it ideal for properties looking to expand internationally. If your team seeks a flexible, scalable solution with a focus on direct bookings and operational simplicity, Misterbooking’s cost-effective, all-in-one design can meet your needs.
For larger properties or those with complex distribution and automation needs, Cloudbeds’ extensive features and recent reviews make it the clear leader. Smaller hotels or chains emphasizing ease of use and quick onboarding might find Misterbooking more aligned with their operational style.
If you want a comprehensive, globally-supported system, go with Cloudbeds. If you prefer a straightforward, responsive platform with high satisfaction scores, choose Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds’ interface is highly rated at 4.58/5 and is praised for its intuitive navigation, quick onboarding, and user-friendly design, which makes staff adoption relatively straightforward. Many recent reviews highlight its ease of use, especially for properties that need to manage multiple channels and complex operations.
Misterbooking slightly edges out with a 4.6/5 score and is recognized for a responsive, straightforward interface that hotel teams find efficient, especially for independent properties. Reviewers note it’s easy to learn and manage, with clear reservation and booking screens.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds offers a suite of 57 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, housekeepings, automated reporting, and multi-lingual support. Its integrations with over 190 partners enable extensive connectivity with OTAs, POS systems, and revenue tools, supporting properties of all sizes.
Misterbooking, with only 5 unique features, focuses on core hotel operations such as reservations, channel management, pre-check-in, and payment automation. While less feature-rich, it excels at providing a streamlined, cost-effective solution.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support score is 4.38/5, with reviews mentioning quick, attentive responses but occasional slowdowns during busy periods. Some users describe their support as friendly and helpful, though a few note long wait times for complex issues.
Misterbooking’s customer support rating stands out at 4.79/5, with reviews emphasizing its operational effectiveness and responsiveness. Users report that the team is helpful, with quick resolutions to issues, especially given the smaller team size.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, revenue management, and payment providers, with 15 shared partners with Misterbooking. Its broad integration network allows for extensive automation, data synchronization, and operational flexibility.
Misterbooking has 26 verified partners, including key OTAs and payment systems, with some exclusive integrations like Vingcard, RoomCloud, and Onity. While fewer in number, these integrations are sufficient for many independent hotels.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 1,219 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, extensive features, and reliable support. Hotels across segments, especially boutique and hostel operations, praise its scalability and automation.
Misterbooking scores slightly higher at 4.83/5 from 21 reviews, with all recent feedback highlighting its simplicity, responsiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Independent hotels appreciate its flexibility and ease of managing high volumes with fewer features.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds is priced at a flat $500 monthly fee with no trial or freemium option, offering a transparent cost for its extensive capabilities. Misterbooking’s pricing is not publicly listed but is positioned as a competitive, scalable solution for independent hotels, often viewed as more affordable.
If your budget is tight or you prefer a pay-as-you-grow model, Misterbooking’s lower-cost structure may appeal. For larger or growing properties, Cloudbeds’ value justifies its higher investment.
Not ideal if you want a simple, budget-friendly solution for very small properties or single-location hotels with minimal distribution needs.
Not ideal if you require a highly customizable or feature-rich platform that handles complex revenue management or extensive multi-channel distribution.
Cloudbeds is a versatile, feature-rich platform suited for properties that need a scalable, globally supported system capable of handling complex operations. Its ability to connect operations, revenue, and distribution makes it ideal for hotels aiming for growth and efficiency.
If your hotel needs deep integration, automation, and a proven track record backed by thousands of recent reviews, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its broad partner network and extensive feature set justify its higher price point for properties seeking a comprehensive solution.
Misterbooking, with its high customer satisfaction and competitive pricing, appeals to independent hotels and small chains that prefer simplicity and agility. It’s best for properties that want a straightforward, responsive PMS with core automation, without the need for extensive features or integrations.
For most hotels looking for proven reliability, broad capabilities, and ongoing innovation, Cloudbeds stands out as the stronger option.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds HMS 和 Misterbooking (HMS) 共享 33 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 50 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 Misterbooking (HMS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Misterbooking (HMS) 提供 26 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。Misterbooking (HMS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,MISTER BOOKING 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问