项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 694 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 222 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 48 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #15 3 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 562 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 242 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 126 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 100 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 468 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 175 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 340 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 12 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical to streamlining your hotel's operations, improving guest experience, and boosting revenue. Cloudbeds PMS by Cloudbeds dominates the market with over 1,070 reviews, a recent surge of 81 reviews in the past six months, and a near-perfect 4.63/5 overall rating, backed by a 100/100 HTScore. Meanwhile, hotelcube offers a tailored, on-premise solution but lacks recent reviews, user ratings, and a broader market presence. Does the data favor the robust, user-tested Cloudbeds platform?
Both platforms aim to simplify hotel management but approach this goal differently. Cloudbeds provides a cloud-based, all-in-one system with centralized reservation, channel management, and reporting tools, designed for a broad range of hotel types globally. hotelcube, on the other hand, offers a flexible, modular suite that is highly customizable and on-premise, primarily targeting properties with specific needs or those preferring local infrastructure. Given Cloudbeds’ high review volume, recent positive feedback, and global reach, it clearly addresses the needs of most hoteliers today. Would your hotel benefit from a proven, scalable platform with extensive integration options?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, ready-to-use cloud platform with broad functionalities and proven support, go with Cloudbeds. It suits independent, boutique, hostel, and small chain hotels seeking a unified system with strong distribution, booking, and revenue tools. If your hotel requires a highly customizable, on-premise solution with specific integrations or prefers local data control, hotelcube’s flexible modules may appeal more. However, considering the lack of recent reviews and market presence for hotelcube, Cloudbeds’s recent review momentum and user satisfaction make it the safer choice for most hotels today.
Cloudbeds boasts a 4.61/5 ease-of-use rating based on over 1,070 reviews, with users citing its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and mobile accessibility. Many reviewers say it’s simple enough for staff with varied technical skills, and its cloud nature allows remote management. hotelcube, with a smaller user base and no recent reviews, offers a customizable interface but lacks publicly available user ratings or feedback. Based on the data, Cloudbeds’s ease of use and recent positive reviews give it a clear edge.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds provides an extensive feature set—42 features exclusive to its platform—including a native booking engine, channel manager, real-time reporting, automated tasks, and integrations with over 190 verified partners. hotelcube offers a single additional feature—on-premise deployment—and lacks the breadth of tools found in Cloudbeds. For example, Cloudbeds supports guest messaging, digital registration, automated reminders, and advanced revenue management, none of which are listed in hotelcube’s offering. Overall, Cloudbeds’s larger feature library and proven integrations make it the superior choice.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a 4.41/5 support rating, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive onboarding. Users often highlight their positive experiences with quick support responses and comprehensive onboarding, contributing to a high likelihood to recommend (91%). hotelcube, lacking recent reviews and support ratings, provides 24/7 direct phone support, but without user feedback, it's difficult to gauge its effectiveness. Given the current data, Cloudbeds’s strong support reputation stands out.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds integrates with 190 verified partners, including major booking engines, channel managers, and revenue tools, offering extensive third-party connectivity. hotelcube’s integration count is limited to 24 verified partners, with only six shared with Cloudbeds, primarily local or niche providers. This significant difference means Cloudbeds can cater to a wider array of operational needs and future growth plans, while hotelcube’s integrations may be more targeted or limited. For scalability and flexibility, Cloudbeds leads.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews (81 in the last six months) consistently rate it highly—averaging 4.63/5—across diverse segments, including boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains. Its user base’s property types, like boutique hotels and hostels, report high satisfaction, especially with its ease of use and support. hotelcube has no recent reviews or publicly available ratings, making Cloudbeds the clear frontrunner in customer satisfaction. The recent, strong review momentum confirms its appeal among hoteliers.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s base price is $600/month, with no freemium or trial options publicly listed. hotelcube’s base price is slightly higher at $700/month, also without a trial. Given the lack of detailed tiered pricing or discounts, Cloudbeds’s slightly lower base fee and proven value through extensive features and support may offer better ROI for most hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with a proven track record of high user satisfaction, continuous recent reviews, and extensive features. It excels in integration, ease of use, and global support, making it suitable for most hotels aiming for operational efficiency and growth.
If you desire a reliable, scalable, and user-loved platform with a broad ecosystem, Cloudbeds is the clear pick. Its recent review momentum and high ratings confirm it’s the preferred choice for hoteliers seeking a proven, versatile solution.
hotelcube may suit hotels needing a highly customizable, on-premise system, but the lack of recent reviews and overall market presence make it a less certain option. Unless your property has specific technical requirements, Cloudbeds’s proven performance offers more confidence and value.
Final Verdict: For most hotels, Cloudbeds’s recent reviews, extensive features, and high support ratings make it the better choice—especially if you prioritize ease of use, global support, and proven reliability.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户普遍反映,Cloudbeds 让他们能够轻松查看、移动、拆分和更新预订,且所有操作均可在单一日历中完成,这加快了前台工作流程并减少了错误。许多用户提到拖放更... 用户普遍反映,Cloudbeds 让他们能够轻松查看、移动、拆分和更新预订,且所有操作均可在单一日历中完成,这加快了前台工作流程并减少了错误。许多用户提到拖放更改、房间调换、延长住宿以及清晰的入住率概览是日常运营中的主要优势。
一个主要的主题是Cloudbeds易于学习,对于员工或技术专长有限的中小型酒店来说足够简单。评论者反复提到界面减少了培训时间,让团队能够专注于宾客,而不是与软... 一个主要的主题是Cloudbeds易于学习,对于员工或技术专长有限的中小型酒店来说足够简单。评论者反复提到界面减少了培训时间,让团队能够专注于宾客,而不是与软件斗争。
报告是Cloudbeds最受重视的优势之一,因为它帮助团队无需手动电子表格即可审查入住率、收入、取消情况和业务表现。与此同时,许多用户希望下载速度更快、筛选更... 报告是Cloudbeds最受重视的优势之一,因为它帮助团队无需手动电子表格即可审查入住率、收入、取消情况和业务表现。与此同时,许多用户希望下载速度更快、筛选更好、定制更多,以及拥有更现代的仪表盘式视觉效果。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一旦联系上,支持通常被描述为有帮助且专业,许多用户称赞入门体验或培训材料。最大的不满是缺乏快速的电话实时帮助,一些评论者表示聊天排队、工单系统或缓慢的... 一旦联系上,支持通常被描述为有帮助且专业,许多用户称赞入门体验或培训材料。最大的不满是缺乏快速的电话实时帮助,一些评论者表示聊天排队、工单系统或缓慢的跟进使得紧急酒店问题更难解决。
用户喜欢Cloudbeds将付款、发票、账单、收据和分账集中管理,这简化了前台和财务工作。然而,也有部分用户提到支付链接或支付网关设置问题、本地发票/税务要求以... 用户喜欢Cloudbeds将付款、发票、账单、收据和分账集中管理,这简化了前台和财务工作。然而,也有部分用户提到支付链接或支付网关设置问题、本地发票/税务要求以及需要更顺畅的支付流程。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 HOTELCUBE PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 208 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HOTELCUBE PMS 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。HOTELCUBE PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,hotelcube 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐