The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
hotelcube 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Guest CRM.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 370 |
在分析了 370 条经验证的评价后,hotelcube 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel is critical to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue. Hotelcube PMS and Stayntouch are two notable contenders, each designed to cater to different hotel needs. While Hotelcube aims to provide a customizable, integrated management platform, Stayntouch emphasizes ease of use, multi-property management, and contactless solutions. How do these systems compare across key categories to fit your hotel’s goals?
Hotelcube and Stayntouch both address core hotel management challenges—reservation handling, front desk operations, and guest data management. Hotelcube offers a modular approach with proprietary modules like Spa & Wellness, Gift Vouchers, and Guest CRM, making it suitable for hotels seeking tailored solutions. Conversely, Stayntouch’s cloud-based platform excels in intuitive navigation, rapid onboarding, and mobile accessibility, which are frequently highlighted in recent reviews. With over 317 recent reviews, Stayntouch’s high recommendation rate (94%) indicates a more proven track record.
Where they diverge is in market presence and integration depth. Hotelcube, with a focus on European markets and fewer integrations, may suit hotels seeking a niche, personalized system. Stayntouch’s extensive third-party integrations, especially in North America, support larger or multi-property brands. Do you prioritize a highly customizable platform or a more user-friendly, scalable cloud solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, regional solution with specific modules like guest CRM and wellness management, Hotelcube might be suitable. Its feature set includes unique modules that cater to boutique and specialized hotels, especially in Europe. However, if your hotel requires a modern, highly scalable system with a simple interface, extensive integrations, and superior support, Stayntouch is the better choice.
For hotels focused on rapid onboarding, mobile capabilities, and a high likelihood of staff adoption, Stayntouch’s proven simplicity makes it ideal. Large chains or multi-property managers aiming for seamless integration and real-time reporting should lean toward Stayntouch’s extensive partner network and cloud infrastructure.
Stayntouch receives a 4.7/5 rating for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Users highlight how staff learn the system fast, and training is considered efficient, with some praise for its mobile-friendly design. In contrast, Hotelcube’s lack of recent review data and a 0/5 user rating suggest limited publicly available feedback on its usability. Its interface, designed for customization, may require more dedicated training and adaptation.
Given the recent reviews and high scores, Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch boasts 30 features exclusive to its platform, including online check-in/out, guest messaging, real-time reporting, and mobile check-in, offering a comprehensive suite for modern hoteliers. Hotelcube features 4 exclusive modules: Spa & Wellness, Gift Vouchers, Guest CRM, and On-premise management, catering to hotels with specific needs.
While both systems share 19 core features, Stayntouch’s broader feature set, especially in automation, guest engagement, and mobile capabilities, positions it as a more versatile solution. For hotels prioritizing digital guest interactions and operational automation, Stayntouch clearly has the edge.
Stayntouch’s support ratings (4.68/5) and recent reviews highlight a responsive, helpful team that facilitates smooth onboarding and ongoing assistance. Review quotes emphasize excellent training, support during implementation, and prompt issue resolution. Hotelcube’s review data is absent, which diminishes confidence in support quality. Without recent feedback or ratings, Hotelcube’s support quality remains unverified.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 188 verified partners, including prominent integrations like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and Channel Managers, enabling extensive connectivity. Hotelcube, with 24 verified partners, supports fewer third-party integrations, focusing on niche European markets. Shared partners include major systems like SiteMinder and Oaky, but Stayntouch’s larger ecosystem provides more flexibility.
For hotels that depend on diverse integrations to run their operations smoothly, Stayntouch is the clear choice.
Stayntouch’s recent reviews—26 in the last 6 months—highlight its high user satisfaction, with a 4.56/5 overall rating and a 94% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments, from boutique to branded properties, praise its ease of use, support, and features. Hotelcube’s lack of recent review data makes it impossible to gauge current customer satisfaction, but its overall rating remains at 0/5.
Given the recent, positive feedback, Edge: Stayntouch.
Hotelcube charges a flat $700 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation or trial options. Stayntouch’s pricing is $800/month, also without trial or setup fees. The slightly higher cost of Stayntouch is justified by its broader feature set, extensive integrations, and better support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Hotelcube aims to serve boutique and regional hotels with a focus on specific modules and customization, but its limited recent review data and small user base make it a less reliable choice today. Stayntouch, with the most recent reviews, high scores, and broad integrations, offers a more proven, scalable platform for modern hoteliers.
If your hotel values quick deployment, ease of use, and extensive third-party support, choose Stayntouch. Its high customer satisfaction and continuous innovation make it the more dependable option for hotels aiming to grow and adapt. Hotelcube may be suitable if your operations are niche, regional, or require specific modules, but the lack of recent data warrants caution.
In conclusion, for most hotels today, Stayntouch’s ease of use, support, and ongoing development make it the better choice—especially if you’re looking for a scalable, cloud-based PMS that can grow with your property.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HOTELCUBE PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 22 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HOTELCUBE PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HOTELCUBE PMS 提供 24 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HOTELCUBE PMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。hotelcube 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问