The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,267 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader and Native Email Marketing.
Jonas Hospitality 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 1,267 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $1,100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,242 | 25 |
在分析了 1,267 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Jonas Hospitality 用户则强调 客户服务, 易于使用, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
用户界面和可访问性
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
支付处理器集成
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
可靠性
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #70 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #28 21 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #37 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #49 6 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #23 18 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #21 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #20 24 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Your team is weighing Cloudbeds PMS by Cloudbeds against Jonas Chorum by Jonas Hospitality to find the best fit for your hotel. Both systems aim to streamline operations, improve guest management, and boost revenue, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and user experience. Cloudbeds offers a more extensive, globally recognized platform with a robust ecosystem, while Jonas targets efficiency for smaller to medium-sized hotels with a focus on ease of access and reporting. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Cloudbeds and Jonas Chorum both serve as core property management systems, but Cloudbeds' broader feature set and larger user base make it a more versatile choice for hotels seeking scalability. Conversely, Jonas, with its simpler interface and specialized functionalities, appeals to properties prioritizing straightforward management and mobile access.
Cloudbeds is trusted by over 1,071 reviews, with recent feedback in the last six months, giving it a data edge. Jonas, with only 24 reviews and no recent feedback, has less current validation. Does your hotel need a proven, extensive platform or a more streamlined, user-friendly system?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, all-in-one platform that connects operations, distribution, and revenue management across diverse property types, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its advanced integrations, extensive marketplace, and global reach suit larger or growing properties aiming for a unified tech ecosystem.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, mobile management, and robust reporting for a smaller to medium-sized operation, Jonas Chorum fits better. Its intuitive interface, flexible access, and dedicated team support are ideal for properties that want straightforward, reliable management without complex features.
In summary, choose Cloudbeds if scalability and feature depth are priorities, and pick Jonas if simplicity and quick deployment matter most.
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61 out of 5 for ease of use, praised for its intuitive, well-organized interface that reduces staff training time. Its onboarding process averages 4.45 out of 5, and staff find the system straightforward for daily tasks, even during peak hours, despite some reports of system speed issues.
Jonas Chorum has a slightly lower ease of use rating at 4.35, but users still find its interface accessible and easy to navigate. Its mobile app enhances on-the-go management, but some users mention occasional system freezes that hinder efficiency.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 49 shared features and an additional 15 exclusive capabilities, including a sophisticated PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, native email marketing, guest CRM, and gift vouchers. These features enable deeper customization and automation, ideal for larger operations.
Jonas Chorum provides core PMS functions, a POS system for restaurants and retail, a central reservation system with OTA and GDS integration, and mobile apps. However, it lacks the breadth of unique features Cloudbeds offers, and only the former has extensive integrations and advanced analytics.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a review support score of 4.41/5, with many users praising its responsive, empathetic support team that helps resolve issues quickly. Its onboarding process is rated 4.45/5, though some mention occasional setup hiccups.
Jonas Chorum slightly surpasses Cloudbeds with a 4.6/5 customer support rating, with reviews highlighting its responsive and knowledgeable team. Users appreciate prompt assistance, especially during system freezes, although fewer recent reviews limit current support validation.
Edge: Jonas Chorum.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including top names like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Actabl, with 13 shared partners. Its integrations cover booking engines, payment processors, marketing tools, and more, supporting comprehensive connectivity.
Jonas has 28 verified integrations, including major OTAs and GDS systems, with 13 shared partners. Its ecosystem is smaller, focusing on core booking and GDS integrations, less expansive than Cloudbeds.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds' overall rating is 4.63/5 based on 1,071 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its usability, integration, and revenue tools. Hotels across segments—from boutique to hostels—rate it highly, especially for its scalability.
Jonas scores 4.59/5 based on 24 reviews, with strong praise for its simplicity, reporting, and responsive support. However, fewer recent reviews limit its current rating’s robustness.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial, making it a predictable investment. Pricing for Jonas isn’t publicly disclosed, but it’s typically tailored for smaller operations with lower upfront costs, though additional fees for integrations may apply.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with a very tight budget or prefers minimal tech reliance.
Not ideal if you need extensive customization, large-scale integrations, or advanced revenue tools.
Cloudbeds stands out as a comprehensive, globally supported PMS with an extensive feature set, making it ideal for hotels planning to scale or diversify. Its broad integration network ensures your property can connect with nearly any third-party tool, simplifying operations and boosting revenue.
Jonas Chorum offers a simple, reliable system with excellent support, suited for hotels prioritizing ease of use, mobile access, and basic automation. Its limited features and smaller ecosystem may restrict growth but provide a straightforward, effective solution for smaller operations.
Choose Cloudbeds if you need a feature-rich, scalable system with a global presence. Opt for Jonas if your hotel values simplicity, quick deployment, and responsive support over extensive features.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $1,100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds PMS 和 Jonas Chorum 共享 49 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Jonas Chorum 的客户服务因其响应迅速、知识渊博和解决问题的热情而受到高度赞誉。特别提到了模范员工,强调了许多用户所体验到的个性化支持。
PMS 的设计简单直观,员工(包括新员工)均可轻松使用,从而减少培训时间并提高运营效率。用户对该系统处理团体预订和费率的能力表示赞赏。
酒店经营者注意到 Jonas Chorum 积极寻求用户反馈,并经常实施改进建议。这种响应能力促进了公司与客户之间的合作关系,支持了服务的发展。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户都对 Jonas Chorum 易于导航的用户界面和跨平台可访问性表示赞赏。它高效地支持群组屏蔽和报告生成等功能,无论是新手还是经验丰富的员工都可以轻松使用... 许多用户都对 Jonas Chorum 易于导航的用户界面和跨平台可访问性表示赞赏。它高效地支持群组屏蔽和报告生成等功能,无论是新手还是经验丰富的员工都可以轻松使用。
Jonas Chorum 强制执行的支付处理器集成是一个重大的缺点。用户必须使用特定的处理器,这会产生额外费用,并且会面临运营中断。这种强制集成会影响多个物业,增... Jonas Chorum 强制执行的支付处理器集成是一个重大的缺点。用户必须使用特定的处理器,这会产生额外费用,并且会面临运营中断。这种强制集成会影响多个物业,增加财务和运营压力。
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Jonas Chorum 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Jonas Chorum 提供 28 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Jonas Chorum:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Jonas Hospitality 的为 18。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问