The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,365 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader and Native Email Marketing.
SkyTouch Technology 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 1,365 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,242 | 123 |
在分析了 1,365 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统, 渠道管理,而 SkyTouch Technology 用户则强调 客户支持响应能力, 远程访问, 胶带图。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
客户支持响应能力
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
远程访问
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
胶带图
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
可定制性限制
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
错误和故障
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #19 41 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #10 72 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #21 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | #23 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #18 47 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #22 27 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #10 45 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #22 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #7 120 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #60 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and SkyTouch Technology hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but Cloudbeds offers a more comprehensive, all-in-one platform with a broader feature set and more recent reviews. SkyTouch is primarily known for its user-friendly interface and detailed reporting but has fewer reviews and less recent feedback.
Given the recent surge in Cloudbeds’ user reviews and its higher overall ratings, your team should consider whether you prioritize a larger, more active user community or a straightforward, easy-to-navigate system. Are you seeking a scalable, integrated management solution, or do you prefer a simpler interface with core functionalities?
Cloudbeds and SkyTouch both address core property management tasks like reservations, rate management, and reporting, but Cloudbeds’s all-in-one ecosystem reduces the need for multiple tools. Cloudbeds’s 1071 reviews over six months, with a 4.63/5 rating, reflect a robust, active user base and continuous updates, whereas SkyTouch’s 119 reviews with a 3.5/5 rating are less current and less diverse.
Cloudbeds’s extensive feature count—39 unique features—encompasses inventory management, online check-in, guest messaging, and digital registration, surpassing SkyTouch’s minimal 2 exclusive features like guest profiles and guest CRM. Do you want a system with more advanced, integrated capabilities or a simpler tool that’s easier to learn?
If your hotel needs a unified platform that combines reservation management, channel syncing, and marketing—especially if scalability matters—Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It’s ideal for independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels that want a flexible, comprehensive solution.
If your team requires an intuitive, easy-to-learn PMS with a focus on detailed reporting and multi-property management, SkyTouch might be sufficient. However, given Cloudbeds’s recent review momentum and higher scores, it’s better suited for hotels aiming for growth and operational efficiency.
Cloudbeds scores slightly lower on ease of use (4.61/5) compared to SkyTouch’s 4.64/5, but Cloudbeds’s more recent reviews praise its user-friendly interface and intuitive design. Many users highlight how quickly staff can learn Cloudbeds and how its mobile app simplifies remote management.
SkyTouch’s cloud-based system is praised for its simplicity and fast onboarding, often cited as a system that reduces training time dramatically. However, SkyTouch’s more limited features can make customization challenging for complex hotel operations.
Edge: SkyTouch.
Cloudbeds offers 39 features exclusive to its platform, including online check-in, automated reminders, guest communication, and a native guest app. SkyTouch’s two unique features—guest profiles and guest CRM—are useful but far less extensive.
Cloudbeds’s additional features like real-time space optimization, GDPR compliance, integrated ID scanners, and automated space management give your team tools for a more dynamic operation. If advanced features are crucial, Cloudbeds leads the pack.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s customer support is rated 4.41/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and support team’s empathy. Many users note that Cloudbeds’s support helps resolve issues promptly, especially during onboarding and integrations.
SkyTouch scores slightly higher at 4.5/5, with users appreciating its 24/7 availability and support but criticizing unresolved long-standing bugs and delays. Recent feedback indicates SkyTouch’s support could improve its responsiveness and problem resolution.
Edge: SkyTouch.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, OpenKey, and Trevo, with 18 shared partners with SkyTouch. Its extensive marketplace allows for deep customization and scalability across diverse property types.
SkyTouch has 33 verified integrations, with key partners like Oracle Hospitality and Onity. While useful, SkyTouch’s smaller ecosystem limits options for expanding or tailoring features.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.63/5 rating based on more than 1,071 reviews, mostly in the last six months. Hotels across segments, from boutique to hostels, rate Cloudbeds higher, particularly praising its ease of use, integration, and support.
SkyTouch, with fewer and older reviews, has a 3.5/5 rating, with many users citing bugs, glitches, and limited customizability. Its user segment is smaller and less recent, making Cloudbeds the more reliable choice for current hotel management needs.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Both platforms are priced at $600/month, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options. Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing makes it predictable, while SkyTouch’s flat-rate fee simplifies budgeting.
Pricing equivalency suggests value depends more on features and support rather than cost. Cloudbeds’s broader capabilities justify its higher recommendation for growth-oriented hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds delivers a more complete, integrated management experience with a higher volume of recent reviews and broader features, making it suitable for hotels looking to scale. Its extensive partner network and flexible platform support diverse property types and operational complexities.
SkyTouch provides a simple, easy-to-use PMS with reliable support and detailed reporting, best for smaller hotels or properties prioritizing ease of onboarding. However, its limited features and older review base make it less suitable for fast-growing or tech-savvy hotels.
If your hotel aims for growth, automation, and a future-proof platform, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Conversely, if you need a straightforward system with minimal complexity, SkyTouch may meet your immediate needs but lacks the scalability of Cloudbeds.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds PMS 和 SkyTouch Technology 共享 25 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 29 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"We are finding great value and payback versus anything else out there on the market, and I have seen them all."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞 SkyTouch 系统直观、操作简便。许多人强调,得益于界面的简洁性,新员工的培训速度非常快。这一特点使得 SkyTouch 特别适合经常招聘新员工的酒店。
SkyTouch 的客户支持收到的反馈褒贬不一。许多用户称赞支持团队的专业性和乐于助人。然而,其他人则批评等待时间过长,以及尽管多次报告,但长期存在的问题仍未... SkyTouch 的客户支持收到的反馈褒贬不一。许多用户称赞支持团队的专业性和乐于助人。然而,其他人则批评等待时间过长,以及尽管多次报告,但长期存在的问题仍未得到解决。
SkyTouch 的云端系统因其远程访问功能而广受好评。这使酒店经理能够从任何有互联网接入的地方监控运营、更改价格和查看报告,这对多酒店经理来说是一个显著的优... SkyTouch 的云端系统因其远程访问功能而广受好评。这使酒店经理能够从任何有互联网接入的地方监控运营、更改价格和查看报告,这对多酒店经理来说是一个显著的优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 SkyTouch 提供了一系列功能,但用户报告称该系统的可定制性有限。具体令人担忧的领域包括无法定制报告、用户界面布局和预订流程以满足独特的酒店需求。
许多用户表示,由于反复出现的软件错误和故障,SkyTouch 让他们很失望。这些问题包括间歇性系统崩溃和登录问题,以及磁带图表和内务管理模块等功能故障。用户表... 许多用户表示,由于反复出现的软件错误和故障,SkyTouch 让他们很失望。这些问题包括间歇性系统崩溃和登录问题,以及磁带图表和内务管理模块等功能故障。用户表示,需要支持团队提供更强大的错误修复和更快的解决方案。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 SkyTouch Technology 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SkyTouch Technology 提供 33 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SkyTouch Technology 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。SkyTouch Technology:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,SkyTouch Technology 的为 77。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问