CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) vs. RoomRaccoon PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 209 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 209 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 表现出色 .

RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 与 RoomRaccoon PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 209 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
80
推荐可能性
0%
94%
易用性
0.0/5
4.8/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.5/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.5/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $1,000/mo
经验证的评价 0 209

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 与 RoomRaccoon PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 209 条经验证的评价后,CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 用户最看重其 ,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
优点
+ 用户界面和体验
+ 一体化系统
+ 自动发送电子邮件和文档
缺点
服务和支持
集成限制
系统错误和稳定性问题

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 对比 RoomRaccoon:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
小型(10-24 间客房) #10 90 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #17 27 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #14 7 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #19 0 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
精品酒店 #9 100 条评价
豪华酒店 #9 64 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #14 29 条评价
长住酒店 #7 28 条评价

按区域

细分市场 CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
北美 #24 7 条评价
欧洲 #5 123 条评价
亚太 #31 4 条评价
中东 #31 1 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. You’re evaluating CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) and RoomRaccoon PMS — two solutions designed to streamline your workflows, but with stark differences in features, support, and market presence. Both aim to solve reservation management, guest communication, and revenue optimization, but their core strengths diverge significantly. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s size, location, and operational needs?

CMS Hospitality offers an enterprise-level, integrated suite with decades of experience serving diverse accommodation types worldwide. RoomRaccoon, by contrast, is a newer but highly-rated platform optimized for small to mid-sized independent hotels, with a focus on ease of use and automation. Are you ready to compare their capabilities and see which suits your hotel’s future?

Is CMS Hospitality or RoomRaccoon Better for Hotels?

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) has a long-standing reputation with 30+ years in the industry, providing a comprehensive solution suited to large operations and multi-property groups. Its broad feature set includes trust accounting, conference management, and enterprise integrations, but it carries no recent reviews and a zero-star rating on HotelTechReport, indicating a lack of current customer feedback.

RoomRaccoon, however, boasts 169 reviews, with an impressive overall rating of 4.88/5 and a recent review volume of five in the last six months. Its 94% likelihood to recommend reflects high user satisfaction, especially among small hotels and independents. Given the recent and plentiful feedback, would you prefer a platform with proven recent performance or an enterprise solution lacking recent validation?

RoomRaccoon vs CMS Hospitality: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel is a small boutique, bed & breakfast, or independent property seeking an all-in-one, user-friendly system, go with RoomRaccoon. It offers a built-in booking engine, channel manager, revenue management, and guest communications, all in a cloud-based package with a $1,000 monthly base price.

If your hotel is a large operation needing multi-property support, advanced enterprise features, and international standards, CMS Hospitality’s GuestCentrix might initially seem suitable. However, with no recent reviews or active customer feedback, it’s challenging to verify current performance; for most hotels, RoomRaccoon’s recent ratings clearly indicate a more reliable choice.

Is CMS Hospitality or RoomRaccoon Easier to Use?

RoomRaccoon is highly praised for its intuitive, modern user interface rated at 4.74/5, with automated onboarding and friendly staff support. Its reviews highlight ease of learning, automation, and minimal training time, making it ideal for small teams.

CMS Hospitality, on the other hand, receives no recent user ratings or feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability today. Based on current data, RoomRaccoon clearly wins for user-friendliness.

Edge: RoomRaccoon

Which Has Better Features: CMS Hospitality or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon offers 51 features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, integrated guest CRM, online check-in, and automated upselling — all designed for small hotel needs. It also integrates with more payment systems, supports multi-lingual interfaces, and provides mobile apps.

CMS Hospitality, by contrast, claims to be an enterprise-level solution with no active feature list or recent user feedback, making it difficult to compare feature depth or usability. Given RoomRaccoon’s extensive and recent feature set, it is the clear leader.

Edge: RoomRaccoon

Which Has Better Customer Support: CMS Hospitality or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon’s support is highly rated at 4.53/5, with frequent positive feedback noting responsiveness and helpfulness. Users appreciate quick onboarding, ongoing assistance, and proactive communication, especially for small, independent hotels.

CMS Hospitality’s customer support ratings are nonexistent, and reviews do not provide recent insights, which raises concerns about support quality and availability. For reliable support, RoomRaccoon is the preferred choice.

Edge: RoomRaccoon

Which Has More Integrations: CMS Hospitality or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon connects to 88 verified partners, including key integrations like Sage, SiteMinder, and Revinate, with 4 shared partners. It boasts a broad ecosystem of tools for revenue, marketing, and operations, enabling flexible customization.

CMS Hospitality, with just 12 verified partners and no recent integration updates, offers limited options. For extensive, current integrations that cater to dynamic hotel operations, RoomRaccoon’s platform is superior.

Edge: RoomRaccoon

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: CMS Hospitality or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon enjoys a 4.88/5 overall rating based on 169 reviews, mostly from small hotels, boutique properties, and independent operators. Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, automation, and increased revenue, with comments like “it’s very user-friendly” and “saving time on manual tasks.”

CMS Hospitality’s rating is 0/5, with no recent feedback, leaving its current user satisfaction unknown. Clearly, hoteliers highly favor RoomRaccoon’s proven performance.

Edge: RoomRaccoon

How Much Do CMS Hospitality and RoomRaccoon Cost?

RoomRaccoon charges a fixed base price of $1,000 per month, with no mention of additional fees or tiered pricing. CMS Hospitality does not publicly disclose pricing, likely requiring a bespoke quote, which may be costly for smaller hotels.

Given the transparent pricing of RoomRaccoon and the lack of public data on CMS Hospitality, for budget-conscious hotels, RoomRaccoon presents a clearer cost structure.

What Type of Hotel Should Use CMS Hospitality?

  • Hotels that require enterprise-level, multi-property management with complex operations.
  • Large resorts, ski hotels, or island resorts needing extensive POS, conference, and inventory features.
  • Hotels with multiple locations across different countries looking for standardized, integrated solutions.
  • Teams that prioritize robust support and custom integrations over ease of use.

Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prioritizes simplicity and quick onboarding. The lack of recent reviews suggests potential risks for smaller operators.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RoomRaccoon?

  • Small to mid-sized independent hotels, boutique inns, and bed & breakfasts.
  • Hotels seeking an easy-to-learn platform with built-in channel management and revenue tools.
  • Properties focused on increasing direct bookings and simplifying operations.
  • Teams that value automation, online check-in, and integrated guest communication.

Not ideal if your property is a large resort or chain needing complex multi-property support or enterprise-level customization. Larger properties might find RoomRaccoon’s features limited.

RoomRaccoon vs CMS Hospitality: The Bottom Line for Hotels

At its core, RoomRaccoon is a modern, all-in-one PMS built for small hotels and independents. Its extensive recent reviews, high satisfaction ratings, and feature set make it a versatile choice for operators who want simplicity combined with automation.

CMS Hospitality, while historically proven for large, multi-property operations, currently lacks recent customer feedback, making its efficacy uncertain. For most hotels, especially smaller ones, RoomRaccoon’s user-friendly approach and proven customer satisfaction deliver a more reliable, cost-effective solution.

If you need an enterprise system with complex integrations and multi-property management, CMS may still be relevant — but be cautious of its outdated review profile. For the majority of hotels seeking a trusted, modern PMS, RoomRaccoon is the safer, more validated choice.

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
Starting Price From $1,000/mo

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 有哪些 RoomRaccoon PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
交付过程
收益管理模块
日历视图
自定义费率
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 39 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 对比 RoomRaccoon(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix)

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RoomRaccoon Buff and Fellow 小型
+ 60% increase in RevPAR in a year by implementing RoomRaccoon
+ �s dynamic pricing tools.
+ 781% ROI on RaccoonUpsell subscription - RoomRaccoon

"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."

Frikkie du Toit
Frikkie du Toit
Hotel Owner
提高运营效率
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix)

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RoomRaccoon O'Two Boutique Hotel 小型
+ 307% ROI on Annual RaccoonUpsell subscription just from ancillary revenue
+ 46% direct bookings
+ Reduced human error by automating payments

"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."

Jayson van Noordwyk
Jayson van Noordwyk
General Manager
改善宾客体验
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix)

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RoomRaccoon Steenhof Suites 小型
+ 1836% ROI on RaccoonUpsell
+ 50% of guests check-in online
+ 127% increase in RevPAR

"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 对比 RoomRaccoon:总结

RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon
4.7/5 来自 209 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和体验 79% 正面

许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。

一体化系统 100% 正面

RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。

自动发送电子邮件和文档 84% 正面

酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

服务和支持 65% 负面

虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。

集成限制 74% 负面

一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。

独特功能

频道管理员 收益管理模块 预订引擎 交付过程 日历视图
4.7/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 88 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 RoomRaccoon 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)
易用性 RoomRaccoon 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
客户支持 RoomRaccoon 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)
性价比 RoomRaccoon 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)
入职培训 RoomRaccoon 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)

关于 CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 与 RoomRaccoon PMS 的常见问题

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 能否替代 RoomRaccoon PMS?

这取决于您的需求。CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 或 RoomRaccoon PMS 是否提供免费方案?

CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix):否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 和 RoomRaccoon PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 的 HT Score 为 0,RoomRaccoon 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息