RoomRaccoon PMS vs. Stayntouch: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 28, 2026  ·  已分析 581 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 581 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 用户界面和体验 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.

Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Guest App.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

RoomRaccoon PMS 与 Stayntouch 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 581 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
80
91
推荐可能性
94%
94%
易用性
4.8/5
4.7/5
客户支持
4.5/5
4.7/5
性价比
4.5/5
4.6/5
起始价格 From $1,000/mo From $800/mo
经验证的评价 209 372

RoomRaccoon PMS 与 Stayntouch 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 581 条经验证的评价后,RoomRaccoon 用户最看重其 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
优点
+ 用户界面和体验
+ 用户友好界面
+ 一体化系统
+ 整合与入职
+ 自动发送电子邮件和文档
+ 系统性能和可靠性
+ 预订管理
缺点
服务和支持
客房管理和客房服务
集成限制
预订管理
系统错误和稳定性问题
费率和收益管理

RoomRaccoon 对比 Stayntouch:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
小型(10-24 间客房) #10 90 条评价 #18 51 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #17 27 条评价 #5 208 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #14 7 条评价 #7 29 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #19 0 条评价 #2 58 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
精品酒店 #9 100 条评价 #6 220 条评价
豪华酒店 #9 64 条评价 #6 180 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #14 29 条评价 #3 152 条评价
长住酒店 #7 28 条评价 #14 17 条评价

按区域

细分市场 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
北美 #24 7 条评价 #4 262 条评价
欧洲 #5 123 条评价 #12 64 条评价
亚太 #31 4 条评价 #21 3 条评价
中东 #31 1 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both RoomRaccoon and Stayntouch aim to streamline hotel management, yet they cater to different hotel profiles and operational needs. Recognizing their core strengths and limitations will help you make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s scale, complexity, and strategic goals.

RoomRaccoon, with its all-in-one platform, emphasizes ease of use for independent and small hotels, integrating reservations, channel management, and automation. Stayntouch, on the other hand, offers a robust cloud PMS designed for multi-property chains and hotels seeking extensive integrations and advanced mobile tools.

Which product aligns better with your property’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions?

Is RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch Better for Hotels?

RoomRaccoon and Stayntouch are both designed to simplify hotel operations but target different hotel segments. RoomRaccoon excels at providing an intuitive, easy-to-implement platform that consolidates booking, channel management, and guest communication into one interface, mainly for independent hotels and boutique properties. Stayntouch’s strength lies in its scalability, multi-property management, and extensive third-party integrations, making it suitable for larger chains and hotel groups.

While RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews highlight high overall satisfaction, including a 4.88/5 rating from 169 reviews, Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 from 317 reviews—more recent ones—indicate a slightly stronger user confidence today. Do you prioritize simplicity and rapid onboarding, or do you need a system capable of managing multiple locations and complex integrations?

RoomRaccoon vs Stayntouch: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel is a small independent property seeking an all-in-one, user-friendly PMS with automated guest communication and yield management, go with RoomRaccoon. It is especially suitable if you want to reduce manual workloads, increase direct bookings, and enjoy a straightforward platform that minimizes training time.

If your hotel operates multiple properties, has complex revenue management needs, or needs extensive third-party integrations like contactless check-in or advanced security features, Stayntouch is the better fit. Its open API and multi-property capabilities make it ideal for hotel groups aiming for scalable, flexible management.

In summary, choose RoomRaccoon for simplicity and affordability, or Stayntouch for scalability and robust integration. Which profile matches your hotel’s growth path?

Is RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch Easier to Use?

RoomRaccoon boasts a 4.74/5 ease of use rating from 169 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface, ease of onboarding, and straightforward management tasks. Reviewers like "really easy to use" and "very user-friendly" highlight how quickly staff adapt, making it ideal for small teams or independent hoteliers.

Stayntouch has a slightly higher overall customer support rating of 4.68/5 from 317 reviews, with users emphasizing its mobile-friendly screens and quick training. However, some mention the speed of navigating dashboards could improve, especially for complex reports.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Features: RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch?

RoomRaccoon offers 16 features exclusive to its platform, including gift vouchers, guest CRM, multi-currency support, inventory management, and real-time two-way integrations. These features cater to independent hotels wanting a versatile, all-in-one system without additional modules.

Stayntouch has 14 unique features, including guest app, digital registration, rules-based room assignments, and extensive security compliance like PCI and GDPR. Its focus on mobile check-in, guest messaging, and task management makes it appealing for hotels prioritizing guest experience and operational automation.

While both systems share 35 features, RoomRaccoon’s broader suite of operational tools and integrations give it a slight edge for small hotels seeking comprehensive packages.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Customer Support: RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch?

RoomRaccoon’s customer support scores 4.53/5, with reviews citing helpful staff but also expressing frustration over slow responses and occasional unresolved issues. Some users note support can be inconsistent, especially during system bugs.

Stayntouch’s support rating is 4.68/5, with many praising their proactive onboarding, quick assistance, and consistent upgrades. Reviewers mention that support is "responsive and easy to work with," and the training team is noted for its thoroughness.

Edge: Stayntouch.

Which Has More Integrations: RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch?

RoomRaccoon connects with 88 verified partners, including popular systems like WuBook Channel Manager and Customer Alliance. Its integrations cover booking engines, revenue tools, and digital marketing, offering flexibility for small to medium properties.

Stayntouch boasts 188 verified partners, with integrations spanning RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and a wide range of third-party solutions. Its open API allows for extensive customization and multi-system synchronization, especially beneficial for larger properties and chains.

While Stayntouch’s broader integration network outpaces RoomRaccoon, the latter’s focus on core hospitality tools suits smaller hotels well.

Edge: Stayntouch.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch?

RoomRaccoon’s reviews are predominantly from small and boutique hotels, with an average rating of 4.88/5. Hoteliers praise its simplicity, automation, and direct booking improvements, with comments like "saves a lot of time" and "more direct bookings."

Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 score comes mainly from mid-sized and large hotels, with users appreciating its multi-property management and mobile capabilities. Some mention that the system’s complexity can be overwhelming for smaller teams.

For overall recent sentiment, Stayntouch’s higher review count and recency lend credibility to its slightly higher rating.

Edge: Stayntouch.

How Much Do RoomRaccoon and Stayntouch Cost?

RoomRaccoon’s pricing starts at $1,000 per month, with no free trial or freemium options. Its straightforward pricing makes it accessible to small hotels but may be less flexible for larger operations.

Stayntouch charges a base fee of $800 monthly, also without a trial, but includes more extensive features suited for multi-property management. Custom quotes are typically provided for larger portfolios.

Both systems operate on subscription models, but Stayntouch’s slightly lower starting price coupled with its scalability may offer better value for growing hotel groups.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RoomRaccoon?

  • Hotels that are independent or boutique, especially those with fewer than 50 rooms.
  • Teams seeking a simple, all-in-one platform that requires minimal training.
  • Properties prioritizing direct bookings and automated guest communication.
  • Hotels with limited technical staff needing easy onboarding.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel is part of a large chain or requires extensive multi-property support.
  • You need advanced security, complex integrations, or multi-language features.
  • Your operations demand highly customizable reporting or sophisticated revenue management.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Stayntouch?

  • Hotel groups managing multiple properties across different regions.
  • Hotels seeking a highly scalable system with extensive third-party integrations.
  • Properties focusing on mobile check-in, guest messaging, and automation.
  • Teams that want a cloud PMS with open APIs for custom solutions.

Not ideal if:

  • You operate a small boutique hotel or bed & breakfast.
  • Your primary focus is a simple booking engine without multi-property needs.
  • You prefer a system with minimal setup and fast implementation; the onboarding process can be more involved.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

RoomRaccoon provides a streamlined, all-in-one platform designed specifically for small hotels and independents. Its strengths lie in its simplicity, automation, and integrated revenue tools, making it ideal for properties looking to do more with less effort.

Stayntouch offers an enterprise-grade PMS that excels in managing multiple properties, providing extensive integrations, and supporting mobile guest experiences. It’s better suited for hotel groups and properties with complex operational needs.

If your hotel is a small independent with limited staff and a desire for quick setup, choose RoomRaccoon. For larger portfolios or chains aiming for scalability and extensive customization, Stayntouch is the more fitting choice.

In conclusion, the decision hinges on your hotel’s size, management complexity, and growth plans. Both systems are capable, but their ideal users differ significantly.


This comprehensive comparison ensures you select the PMS that best fits your hotel’s current needs and future ambitions.

RoomRaccoon PMS 和 Stayntouch 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
Starting Price From $1,000/mo From $800/mo

RoomRaccoon PMS 有哪些 Stayntouch 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RoomRaccoon PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 35 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
EPoS
PMS 连接性
任务管理
分析仪表板
在线 24/7 支持
基本定价
客人资料
客户关系管理
平板电脑/自助服务终端值机
礼品卡
符合 PCI 标准
访客应用

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:RoomRaccoon 对比 Stayntouch(按业务目标)

我们分析了 13 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
RoomRaccoon Buff and Fellow 小型
+ 60% increase in RevPAR in a year by implementing RoomRaccoon
+ �s dynamic pricing tools.
+ 781% ROI on RaccoonUpsell subscription - RoomRaccoon

"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."

Frikkie du Toit
Frikkie du Toit
Hotel Owner
Stayntouch Stayntouch

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

提高运营效率
RoomRaccoon O'Two Boutique Hotel 小型
+ 307% ROI on Annual RaccoonUpsell subscription just from ancillary revenue
+ 46% direct bookings
+ Reduced human error by automating payments

"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."

Jayson van Noordwyk
Jayson van Noordwyk
General Manager
Stayntouch Snowflake Mountain Resort & Spa 小型
+ Efficiency and Time Savings | The integration with Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations not only enhances efficiency but also empowers staff to provide better service to guests. Without the need for completing many administrative tasks manually and manual data input for reports, Stoweflake employees are able to have much more engaging interactions with guests.
+ Accuracy and Reporting | With the integration, Stoweflake can generate detailed automated reports on revenue and expenses, track maintenance costs, and schedule routine repairs. These reports are invaluable for informed decision-making and future revenue forecasting.

"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."

Shannon Green
Shannon Green
General Manager
改善宾客体验
RoomRaccoon Steenhof Suites 小型
+ 1836% ROI on RaccoonUpsell
+ 50% of guests check-in online
+ 127% increase in RevPAR

"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."

Stayntouch The TWA Hotel 小型
+ The TWA Hotel optimizes its operations with Stayntouch's PMS, seamlessly integrating it with multiple platforms, including six restaurants, a custom IBE, and reporting tools. Guests enjoy hassle-free self-check-in via Stayntouch Kiosks, while the hotel's mobile PMS empowers staff to assist guests across its expansive campus. Stayntouch's robust automation enhances housekeeping management, accounting processes, and other back-office tasks, elevating efficiency and service quality throughout the hotel.
+ The TWA Hotel adopts a hybrid booking approach, combining Stayntouch's hourly and nightly booking options, seamlessly integrated with a custom IBE for direct bookings and pricing optimization. Additionally, the hotel efficiently manages contracts with multiple airlines and corporations through Stayntouch's comprehensive Allotment module, catering to its busy airport clientele.
+ The TWA Hotel achieves scalable integrations by utilizing Stayntouch's open APIs to connect their PMS with multiple platforms, including six restaurants, separate POS systems, a custom IBE, and various reporting tools. During the hotel's bustling grand opening, Stayntouch PMS was deployed swiftly in under two weeks, with managers onboarded in just two days. Currently, TWA Hotel staff benefit from 24/7 direct support with a response time of less than one hour.

"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."

Jack Runkle
Jack Runkle
General Manager

RoomRaccoon 对比 Stayntouch:总结

RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon
4.7/5 来自 209 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和体验 79% 正面

许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。

一体化系统 100% 正面

RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。

自动发送电子邮件和文档 84% 正面

酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

服务和支持 65% 负面

虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。

集成限制 74% 负面

一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。

排名更高的方面

小型(10-24 间客房) #10 vs #18
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #6 vs #31
住宿加早餐与客栈 #9 vs #11
长住酒店 #7 vs #14

独特功能

礼品卡 客户关系管理 客人资料 EPoS PMS 连接性
4.7/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 88 个集成
查看资料
Stayntouch
Stayntouch
4.7/5 来自 372 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户友好界面 79% 正面

该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。

整合与入职 93% 正面

Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。

系统性能和可靠性 67% 正面

Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告和分析 46% 负面

虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。

客房管理和客房服务 56% 负面

客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #7 vs #14
中型(25-74 间客房) #5 vs #17
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 vs #19
精品酒店 #6 vs #9

独特功能

在线 24/7 支持 任务管理 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 访客应用 基本定价
4.7/5 易用性 4.7/5 客户支持 189 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 RoomRaccoon 4.9 vs 4.6 (+0.3)

关于 RoomRaccoon PMS 与 Stayntouch 的常见问题

RoomRaccoon PMS 能否替代 Stayntouch?

这取决于您的需求。RoomRaccoon PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 189 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

RoomRaccoon PMS 或 Stayntouch 是否提供免费方案?

RoomRaccoon PMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 RoomRaccoon PMS 和 Stayntouch?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RoomRaccoon 的 HT Score 为 80,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息