The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Eptera PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter excels with its dedicated focus on hostels and its proven ease of use, while Eptera offers a broader modular suite for hotels seeking tailored functionalities. What features are most critical for your property’s growth and daily operations?
Counter’s more than 54 recent reviews, with a high overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend, provide strong confidence in its performance. Eptera’s absence of reviews and lower presence in the market suggest less proven reliability at this stage. Which system will better support your team today?
Counter is specifically built for hostel operators and small hotel owners, emphasizing an intuitive, mobile-friendly platform that simplifies daily tasks like check-ins, reservations, and POS transactions. Eptera, by contrast, adopts a modular approach suitable for various hotel types, giving you the flexibility to choose only the modules you need but with a less proven overall user experience.
Counter’s recent reviews praise its user-friendly interface, fast onboarding, and strong support, especially for hostel environments. Conversely, Eptera’s broader feature set indicates potential for extensive customization, but without recent user feedback, its actual usability and support quality remain uncertain.
Do you prioritize a straightforward solution with a proven track record or a flexible platform that adapts to diverse needs?
If your hotel operates primarily as a hostel and values ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, go with Counter. Its high review count and recent positive feedback demonstrate reliability for hostels, with key features like channel management, POS integration, and automated tasks.
If your property requires a modular system that can be customized with specific functionalities like guest messaging, digital registration, or revenue management—especially if you aim for a broader hotel operation—Eptera might be appealing. However, without recent reviews or proven user satisfaction, its suitability remains uncertain.
For your property’s immediate needs, preference for usability, and support responsiveness, Counter stands out as the safer choice.
Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5, with users describing it as simple, intuitive, and quick to learn. Its onboarding process averages 4.7/5, and reviews highlight that staff find it easy to adopt, with many noting their staff could be trained rapidly.
Eptera offers a modular, potentially complex interface, but no recent reviews or ratings are available to gauge ease of use. Given Counter’s extensive recent feedback and high ratings, it clearly surpasses Eptera in user-friendliness.
Edge: Counter.
Counter provides 19 shared features, including booking management, channel integration, and POS. However, Eptera outshines with 33 features, offering modules like guest communication, digital registration, online check-in/out, real-time reporting, and employee messaging—features Counter currently lacks.
Counter’s features are more targeted toward hostel needs, while Eptera’s broad suite suits larger or more complex hotels seeking comprehensive management tools. If your hotel prioritizes a rich feature set, Eptera has the edge, but Counter’s core functionalities are highly rated for simplicity.
Edge: Eptera.
Counter’s support scores an impressive 4.96/5, with users praising its quick, helpful responses and dedicated staff like Evelyn and Max. Many reviews mention that support is consistently responsive and professional, though time zone delays are occasionally noted.
Eptera’s support ratings are unavailable, and without recent reviews, it’s difficult to assess their service quality. Given Counter’s proven, high-rated support team, it clearly offers a more reliable customer experience.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 7 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds, with exclusive integrations such as WuBook and FLYR. Eptera currently offers only 1 verified integration, with its ecosystem still developing.
For properties needing multiple platform connections, Counter’s broader partner network provides more flexibility and options. The limited integrations of Eptera may restrict expansion or third-party compatibility in the near term.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s ratings reflect a 4.73/5 overall score based on 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers across various segments, especially hostels, appreciate its ease of use, support, and automation features.
Eptera has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Until its user base grows and reviews emerge, Counter remains the more trusted option.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing is not publicly listed, but it is described as a free system, especially tailored for hostel operators. Eptera charges a base price of $1,100 per month, with no trial available.
Counter’s free model makes it especially attractive for budget-conscious hostels and small properties, while Eptera’s cost may be justified for larger hotels seeking a modular, comprehensive solution.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive revenue management, advanced reporting, or a large-scale, multi-property system.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a simple, all-in-one solution without extensive customization or if you value proven support and reviews.
Counter offers a straightforward, reliable PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with high user satisfaction, responsive support, and proven integrations. It’s an excellent choice if your priority is ease of use, quick onboarding, and proven performance.
Eptera provides a modular, flexible platform suitable for larger or more complex properties that need specific functionalities. However, with no recent reviews or demonstrated support, its suitability for immediate operational needs remains uncertain.
Choose Counter if your focus is on simplicity, support, and proven results. Opt for Eptera if you require a highly customizable system and are prepared for its evolving ecosystem.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Eptera PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Eptera PMS 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Eptera PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Eptera 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问