The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
HOIST GROUP 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 HOIST GROUP 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that simplifies daily operations, enhances guest experience, and integrates with existing tools. Counter by Counter and HOIST GROUP's HotSoft are both designed to meet these goals, but they diverge significantly in their approach, support, and market presence. Counter, being newer and more reviewed, offers a highly rated, hostelry-focused platform, while HotSoft lacks recent reviews or a tangible user base. How do these differences impact your decision?
Counter emphasizes ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations for hostels and small hotels, whereas HotSoft aims for a broader hotel management scope but lacks recent user feedback. Your hotel’s specific needs—whether in a hostel or a full-service property—should guide which is more suitable.
Counter and HotSoft both aim to streamline hotel operations but do so through different lenses. Counter, with a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 recent reviews, excels in user-friendliness, automation, and support, especially for hostels, where 83% of its users operate. In contrast, HotSoft has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its current performance or usability.
Counter’s recent reviews highlight its simple, intuitive interface, automated features like payment processing, and a mobile-friendly design. Conversely, HotSoft's lack of recent feedback leaves hotel decision-makers uncertain about its current capabilities or user satisfaction. Would you prefer a platform with proven recent performance and a strong user base?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property needing a straightforward, easy-to-use PMS with automation, go with Counter. Its features like channel management, POS integration, and guest CRM are tailored for the hostel segment, and its high review count lends confidence.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, multi-property management system with strong reporting and automation, HotSoft might seem appealing. However, without recent reviews or a known user base, it's risky. For now, Counter’s proven track record and targeted features make it the safer, more reliable choice.
Counter boasts a 4.6/5 ease of use rating from 54 reviews, with users describing its interface as clean, intuitive, and quick to learn. HotSoft has no recent or specific user ratings, leaving its ease of use uncertain.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter’s mobile-friendly, simple calendar view, and straightforward onboarding process. Support team responsiveness also enhances usability. Without recent user feedback on HotSoft, the clear edge goes to Counter for user-friendliness.
Counter offers 19 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeper module, guest CRM, multi-currency/multi-lingual support, and automated night audits. HotSoft’s feature set remains unspecified but is described as comprehensive for hotel operations, likely covering reservations, front desk, billing, and reporting.
Counter’s specific feature count and recent focus on automation and integrations give it a tangible edge. HotSoft’s broader hotel management scope may be suitable for larger properties but lacks the detailed, modern feature set Counter provides. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support rating is a stellar 4.96/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, mentioning team members like Evelyn and Max positively. Users frequently mention quick, clear assistance and proactive support.
HotSoft has no recent reviews or explicit support ratings, making it impossible to gauge current support quality. Given the high support score for Counter, it clearly offers a more reliable and responsive service. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki. HotSoft's integration landscape remains unverified with no listed partners or shared integrations.
Counter’s broad integration options enable your property to connect with essential third-party tools, streamlining operations. HotSoft’s integration capabilities are less transparent, suggesting fewer or less current options. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews, from a dedicated user base of hostels and small hotels, rate it at 4.73/5 overall, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its latest reviews praise ease of use, support, and automation.
HotSoft has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to compare user satisfaction. Given the comprehensive recent feedback for Counter, it’s the clear favorite among hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly listed, but it is not offered as a freemium or monthly flat fee, indicating a likely custom or per-property fee structure. HotSoft similarly does not disclose pricing, suggesting it targets larger hotel groups with customized quotes.
Given both lack transparent pricing, your decision will likely depend on negotiations based on property size and needs. However, Counter’s free trial option and transparent feature set make it easier to assess value before committing.
Counter is well-suited for small to medium properties focusing on guest experience and operational simplicity, especially hostels.
HotSoft targets properties with complex operational needs and a preference for a full-suite PMS.
Counter is a newer, highly reviewed PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, emphasizing ease of use, automation, and support. Its 54 recent reviews and high ratings suggest it is a reliable choice for properties prioritizing simplicity and quick deployment.
HotSoft, despite its comprehensive feature set, lacks recent user feedback or a proven track record, making it a gamble for hotels seeking reassurance. For now, Counter’s proven performance and dedicated focus on small-scale properties make it the clear choice.
If your hotel needs an intuitive, automation-focused PMS for a hostel or boutique hotel, Counter is the safer investment with proven satisfaction. Larger properties or chains seeking more extensive management tools might consider HotSoft, but should do so cautiously until more recent user experience data becomes available.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
HOIST GROUP |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HOIST GROUP - HotSoft 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。HOIST GROUP - HotSoft:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,HOIST GROUP 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问