The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel, your primary goal is often to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and make data-driven decisions. Counter by Counter and HoresPlus by Hores both aim to serve these needs but approach them very differently. Counter is tailored for hostels, emphasizing simplicity and affordability, while HoresPlus offers a broader, more feature-rich platform suited for larger or more complex hotels. How do their strengths and weaknesses stack up for your property?
Counter's recent reviews and high user ratings suggest it is a reliable choice for hostel owners and small hotel operators. Conversely, HoresPlus, lacking recent reviews and a visible user base, appears less proven in the current market. Is this difference enough to influence your decision?
Counter by Counter has achieved a high overall rating of 4.73 out of 5 based on 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, fast customer support, and affordability. Its focus on simplicity makes it ideal for hostels and small hotels that prioritize straightforward management over complex features. However, users report bugs with bed availability and overbooking issues, which can disrupt daily operations.
HoresPlus by Hores, with no reviews in the past six months and a score of zero, lacks recent user feedback, making its reliability hard to assess today. It claims to manage all aspects of hotel operations from reservations to housekeeping but does not provide enough recent data to gauge performance or customer satisfaction. Given the absence of recent reviews, is it the safer choice for your hotel?
Are you seeking a proven, highly-rated PMS for a small or hostel property? Or are you prepared to gamble on a less-tested platform with potentially more features? The answer depends on your risk appetite and operational complexity.
If your hotel is a hostel or small accommodation prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, Counter is the better fit. It boasts a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating, with users praising its intuitive interface and mobile-friendly design. Its core features include automated night audits and seamless integrations with platforms like Stripe and GOKI, reducing manual tasks and enabling remote management.
HoresPlus might be more suitable if your property requires a broad set of features such as advanced revenue management, real-time reporting, guest messaging, or integrated payment terminals. However, without recent reviews or a demonstrated track record, it’s difficult to validate its effectiveness. Do you need a system with proven performance in small hostels or a comprehensive platform with extensive features for larger hotels?
In summary, for most small hotels and hostels, Counter’s high review count and recent positive feedback make it the safer, clearer choice. For hotels needing complex operational tools and proven reliability, HoresPlus’s lack of recent validation makes it a less attractive candidate at this time.
Counter’s user interface consistently receives top marks, with a 4.6/5 rating and praise for its clarity and simplicity. Users describe it as "easy to learn and teach" and appreciate the mobile accessibility that allows management from anywhere. The onboarding process, rated at 4.7/5, is straightforward, and staff adoption is smooth, thanks to its intuitive design.
HoresPlus, lacking recent reviews and a significant user base, offers no current data on ease of use. From its marketing materials, it aims to be an all-in-one, centralized platform, but without user feedback, its usability remains unverified. Is a proven, user-friendly system more critical than a feature-heavy one with untested interfaces?
Edge: Counter.
Counter features 17 shared functionalities such as reservations, check-ins, and basic reporting, but it offers only two features exclusive to its platform: automated night audits and cloud hosting. Its core strengths lie in automation, POS integration, and simplicity.
HoresPlus, on the other hand, offers a large suite of 32 unique features, including transactional emails, guest messaging, native email marketing, gift vouchers, task management, automated reminders, online check-in/out, guest apps, real-time status updates, and integrated payment options. These features cater to larger or more complex operations demanding extensive automation and customization.
Given the feature gap, if your hotel requires advanced automation, guest communication, and operational tools, HoresPlus has the edge. However, for smaller properties prioritizing core PMS functions, Counter’s streamlined approach may suffice.
Edge: HoresPlus.
Counter’s support team has garnered a near-perfect rating of 4.96/5, with many reviews highlighting their responsiveness and professionalism. Clients like Evelyn and Max are praised for quick replies and helpful assistance, although some mention support delays in certain time zones.
In contrast, Hores has no recent reviews or publicly available customer support ratings. This absence makes it impossible to gauge the effectiveness of their support team today. For a hotel relying on responsive help, Counter’s proven support is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Both platforms support seven verified integrations, including popular partners like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder. Counter’s unique integrations include WuBook, FLYR, and Goki, which are tailored to the hostel and small hotel markets.
HoresPlus offers integrations with Profitroom, Bookassist, Onity, IDeaS, D-Edge, MyStay, and Bookolo, indicating a focus on larger hotel chains and revenue management solutions. If your property relies on specific third-party tools, consider these differences carefully.
Given the recent activity and community feedback, Counter’s integrations are well-tested and current, giving it a slight edge.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews, totaling 54 with recent feedback, paint a clear picture of satisfaction, especially among hostel operators. It maintains a high overall rating of 4.73/5 and a likelihood to recommend of 91%. Hotel segments like hostels and independent hotels rate it highly, with some praising its user-friendly interface and automation.
Hores, with no recent reviews and no available ratings, cannot currently be rated by hoteliers. This lack of recent data diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Edge: Counter.
Both Counter and Hores do not publicly disclose specific pricing. Counter’s model is a flat monthly fee without a freemium or trial period, and no implementation costs are mentioned. Similarly, Hores offers no detailed pricing information, suggesting potential custom quotes based on the hotel’s needs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, you should contact each provider directly for a quote tailored to your property’s size and features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue management, complex automation, or extensive customization, as these features are limited in Counter.
Not ideal if your property is small, prefers simplicity, or has budget constraints, since Hores's extensive features might be more than you need.
Counter by Counter is a straightforward, highly-rated PMS ideal for small hotels and hostels that value simplicity, ease of use, and quick onboarding. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings make it a trusted choice for properties seeking reliable, basic management tools.
HoresPlus offers a broad set of features aimed at larger, more complex hotels that need extensive automation, real-time reporting, and integrated guest communication. However, its lack of recent reviews and proven market presence today make it a less certain choice for hoteliers looking for reliable performance.
If your property is small or just starting out, Counter is the safer, more validated option. Larger, sophisticated properties should consider HoresPlus if they need the advanced features and are willing to navigate its untested current support landscape.
In summary, choose Counter if:
Choose HoresPlus if:
Ultimately, your decision should align with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans. The most recent data favors Counter, making it the recommended choice for today’s hoteliers.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 HoresPlus 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HoresPlus 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。HoresPlus:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Hores 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问