The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 59 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.
Host Hotel Systems 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and On premise.
基于 HTR 上 59 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 2 |
在分析了 59 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Host Hotel Systems 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #30 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Host Hotel Systems hinges on your property's specific needs and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter is tailored for hostels and small properties, focusing on ease of use and affordability. Host Hotel Systems, meanwhile, targets larger hotels and chains with a broader feature set and more extensive integrations. Does your team prioritize simplicity or comprehensive functionality?
Counter offers a free, user-friendly PMS designed specifically for hostels, making it ideal for small, independent properties that need quick setup and straightforward management. Host Hotel Systems caters to larger hotels needing advanced features and a more robust operational toolkit. Which aligns better with your current goals and scale?
Counter and Host Hotel Systems serve different hotel profiles with distinct operational needs. Counter is built for hostels, B&Bs, and small boutique hotels, emphasizing simplicity, mobility, and affordability. It’s especially suited for properties with limited staff or those prioritizing fast onboarding and minimal training. Conversely, Host Hotel Systems is designed for hotels needing extensive features like guest profiling, detailed analytics, and on-premise management, making it more suitable for medium to large properties or hotel groups.
If your property is a hostel or small inn seeking an intuitive, cost-effective solution, Counter should be your choice. If you operate a larger hotel chain that requires complex reporting, guest management, and a wide array of integrations, Host Hotel Systems will better meet your needs.
Counter boasts a 4.6/5 ease of use rating based on 54 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Customers mention that staff can learn it quickly, citing a straightforward setup and minimal training requirements. Support responsiveness is also highly rated, with particular praise for staff like Evelyn and Max who promptly resolve issues.
Host Hotel Systems has a slightly lower rating of 4.5/5 but remains highly regarded for its user-friendly design tailored for hotel staff. Its interface is described as powerful yet approachable, with a focus on simplifying complex operations. Given the recent review count and higher overall rating, Counter’s ease of use edges out its competitor.
Edge: Counter
Counter offers three exclusive features: a dedicated channel manager, booking engine, and mobile app—crucial tools for hostels and small properties managing reservations on the go. Its core features include POS integration and automatic payments, which streamline daily operations.
Host Hotel Systems provides a significantly broader feature set—31 unique functionalities—covering transaction emails, on-premise management, gift vouchers, task management, automated reminders, guest messaging, digital registration, online check-in/out, real-time updates, automated room assignments, detailed reporting, rate management, PCI compliance, EPoS, and wellness modules.
With over 16 shared features, Host Hotel Systems clearly offers more comprehensive operational tools. If your hotel needs advanced guest profiling, automated marketing, or on-premise modules, Host Hotel Systems’s extensive features prevail.
Edge: Host Hotel Systems
Counter’s support ratings are outstanding, with a 4.96/5 score based on 54 reviews, and 91% of hoteliers would recommend it. Reviewers frequently praise the responsiveness, mentioning staff like Evelyn and Max for their quick, helpful responses. Users appreciate the ongoing improvements and flexibility, despite some bugs affecting bookings and bed availability.
Host Hotel Systems scores 4/5 on support, with positive comments emphasizing their proactive partnership and helpfulness. Reviewers note that responsiveness could be improved, especially for technical issues, but overall, the support is competent. Given the more recent, numerous reviews for Counter, its support quality is the stronger choice.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including key platforms like WuBook, FLYR, Cloudbeds, and Channex. Its integration set supports POS, channel management, and access control, improving operational flow for small properties.
Host Hotel Systems boasts 44 verified partners—far more extensive—covering revenue analytics, online marketing, payment gateways, and guest feedback tools. Shared integrations include SiteMinder and Stripe, but its wide network supports larger, multi-property operations.
If seamless integration with numerous third-party tools is critical, Host Hotel Systems’s broader partner list offers more options. For single properties or hostels, Counter’s integrations are often sufficient.
Edge: Host Hotel Systems
Counter has a 4.73/5 rating from 54 recent reviews, with 91% likely to recommend, especially among hostels and independent properties. Reviewers highlight its simplicity, quick onboarding, and responsiveness, with many calling it the best PMS for hostels.
Host Hotel Systems, with only 2 reviews, has no recent feedback, making its rating less reliable. The existing comments focus on its extensive features but lack detailed user satisfaction metrics. As a result, Counter’s higher, more recent review volume makes it the clear favorite.
Edge: Counter
Counter offers a free, no-trial, no-implementation fee PMS, making it accessible for small properties and startups. Its cost-effective nature is a significant advantage, especially for budget-conscious hostels.
Host Hotel Systems does not specify pricing but indicates no trial or monthly fees. Larger hotels and chains might negotiate tailored contracts, likely reflecting its enterprise-level scope. For small properties, Counter’s free model offers unmatched value; larger hotels should seek direct quotes from Host Hotel Systems.
Edge: Counter
Not ideal if:
Who Should Use Counter
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Who Should Use Host Hotel Systems
Not ideal if:
Counter excels as a lightweight, easy-to-use PMS for hostels and small hotels, with a strong support reputation and recent positive reviews. Its free pricing makes it especially attractive for properties with tight budgets and limited tech needs, delivering essential management tools with minimal fuss.
Host Hotel Systems offers a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and a focus on larger hotel operations. Its capabilities cater to properties needing deep analytics, automation, and a wide array of modules, making it suitable for bigger hotels and chains.
In summary, if your hotel is a small operation, especially a hostel or boutique, Counter is the more appropriate choice. For larger hotels seeking comprehensive management solutions, Host Hotel Systems provides the detailed tools and integrations you require.
Choose Counter if you value simplicity, affordability, and recent high reviewer satisfaction. Opt for Host Hotel Systems if your hotel requires advanced features, multiple integrations, and a scalable solution for complex operations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Host Hotel Systems 共享 16 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 22 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Host Hotel Systems 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Host Hotel Systems 提供 44 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Host Hotel Systems:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Host Hotel Systems 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问