The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to find an intuitive platform that streamlines operations and offers reliable support. Counter by Counter is a dedicated PMS for hostels with a focus on ease of use and automation, while HOTELCUBE PMS offers a broader, customizable solution for hotels across segments, albeit with limited user feedback. Given the recent activity and high rating score, Counter appears to be the more dependable choice for your hostel or budget accommodation. But does it meet all your operational needs?
Counter and HOTELCUBE serve different hotel types. Counter, with a focus on hostels and small accommodations, simplifies bookings, check-ins, and guest management through an easy-to-navigate interface, backed by 54 reviews and a high rating of 4.73/5. HOTELCUBE, on the other hand, is a more extensive suite designed for larger hotels, with no recent reviews available and a focus on modular, multi-department management.
Counter’s ease of use (rated 4.6/5) and customer support (rated 4.96/5) are highly praised, whereas HOTELCUBE’s support and user experience are less documented. For your property, which prioritizes simplicity and quick onboarding, Counter’s focus on small properties makes it the stronger candidate. Are you looking for a straightforward solution or a fully customizable hotel management system?
If your hotel is a hostel, bed & breakfast, or boutique operation requiring quick setup, affordable pricing, and a user-friendly interface, go with Counter. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and strong ratings for ease of use and support make it ideal for small teams seeking efficiency.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, customizable system that manages multiple departments and complex workflows, HOTELCUBE would be more suitable. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited user feedback suggest it might not be as proven or straightforward for smaller or less complex operations.
Counter scores highly on usability, with a 4.6/5 rating and positive reviews praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Users mention that staff can quickly learn the system, and management can operate it remotely without technical issues. Support from the Counter team is also frequently described as responsive and helpful, especially from staff like Evelyn and Max.
In contrast, HOTELCUBE has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it difficult to gauge its ease of use. Its interface, while customizable, may require more training and onboarding, especially given the lack of recent user feedback.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 16 shared features, plus three unique ones: channel manager, booking engine, and ancillary revenue tracking. It integrates with platforms like Stripe and Goki, streamlining payments and access control. Conversely, HOTELCUBE provides seven unique features, including spa & wellness modules, gift vouchers, integrated ID scanners, guest communication, and revenue management tools—features that Counter does not have.
While Counter’s core functionalities are well-suited for small operations, HOTELCUBE’s additional modules target larger hotels with more complex needs. For a straightforward PMS, Counter’s features are more relevant; for a full-service hotel, HOTELCUBE’s offerings might be better.
Edge: Counter.
Counter garners a 4.96/5 support rating based on recent reviews, with hoteliers highlighting quick responsiveness and helpful staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the support team's professionalism, though some note slower responses during off-hours.
HOTELCUBE lacks recent review data and detailed feedback, making it difficult to assess support quality. Given the high support ratings for Counter, it is clearly the more reliable option for ongoing assistance.
Edge: Counter.
Counter connects with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like WuBook and Stripe, and offers integrations with channel managers and payment systems. HOTELCUBE boasts 24 verified partners, including HQ Revenue, Lybra Tech, and RoomCloud, with a broader array of integrations spanning revenue management, booking tools, and guest communication.
If your hotel relies on multiple third-party systems, HOTELCUBE’s extensive integration list is advantageous. For small-scale operations, Counter’s core integrations suffice.
Edge: HOTELCUBE.
Counter receives a high overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 recent reviews, with an overwhelming 91% likelihood to recommend. Its primary users—hostels and small accommodations—appreciate its simplicity, automation, and support, especially in recent feedback.
HOTELCUBE has no recent reviews or ratings available, so it cannot be directly compared. For hotels prioritizing proven satisfaction and reputation, Counter’s high ratings confirm its value.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publish pricing details but is noted for its free model tailored for hostels, with no implementation or monthly fees reported. HOTELCUBE charges a fixed base price of $700, with no mention of ongoing subscription costs, but its pricing might be less accessible for small properties.
If affordability is critical, Counter’s free-to-use platform offers a clear advantage. HOTELCUBE’s cost could be justified by its extensive features but may not appeal to smaller hotels.
Counter is a proven, highly-rated PMS designed for small, budget-conscious properties like hostels, B&Bs, and boutique hotels. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and ease of use make it a dependable choice for streamlining daily operations.
HOTELCUBE offers a broader, modular platform suitable for larger, full-service hotels that need extensive customization and multiple departmental modules. However, the lack of recent reviews and user feedback suggests it’s less tested in today’s market.
If your hotel values simplicity, support, and affordability, Counter is the clear winner. For complex, multi-department management, HOTELCUBE might be suitable if you can evaluate its capabilities directly, but its market presence is less established.
In summary, for your hostel or small hotel seeking a reliable, easy-to-use PMS backed by recent strong reviews, Counter by Counter stands out as the better choice.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 HOTELCUBE PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HOTELCUBE PMS 提供 24 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。HOTELCUBE PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,hotelcube 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问