The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 115 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 .
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and On premise.
基于 HTR 上 115 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 58 |
在分析了 115 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 自动化功能, 平台集成,而 Maestro PMS 用户则强调 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能, 培训和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
|
+
价格
▾
|
+
与其他系统集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #41 7 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #18 35 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #32 2 条评价 | #12 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | #10 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #25 26 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #20 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #38 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #12 53 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can be pivotal in streamlining your hotel’s operations and elevating the guest experience. Your options, Counter by Counter and Maestro PMS (Northwind), both aim to address core hotel management challenges but diverge significantly in features, scale, and user feedback. Counter focuses on simplicity, affordability, and mobile friendliness for hostels and small properties, while Maestro offers a comprehensive, customizable solution for larger, more complex hotels and resorts. The question is: which system aligns better with your hotel’s current and future needs?
Counter is designed to be a free, easy-to-use platform tailored primarily to hostels and small accommodations. Maestro, on the other hand, caters to a wide range of property types, emphasizing modularity and integration for multi-property groups and upscale resorts. Both systems aim to improve operational efficiency, but their approaches and strengths differ. So, what’s the best fit for your hotel’s scale, complexity, and growth plans?
Counter and Maestro PMS solve the basic need for managing reservations, check-ins, and guest data but do so with different philosophies. Counter’s core appeal is its simplicity, with an intuitive interface and a mobile-friendly design that reduces training time and daily management hassles. Maestro offers a deep feature set, including over 20 modules such as revenue management, guest messaging, and online check-in, which can support complex operations and large teams.
Despite both products supporting integrations, Maestro’s extensive partner network (89 verified partners) makes it more adaptable for hotels with existing systems. Counter’s main strength lies in its straightforward, hostelry-focused design, but it lacks some advanced features like revenue management or guest engagement modules. Do you need a lightweight, user-friendly system or a robust, feature-heavy platform that can grow with your property?
If your hotel is a hostel, boutique inn, or small property that prioritizes ease of use and quick onboarding, Counter is the better fit. It has a high overall rating of 4.73/5, more recent reviews, and a strong focus on simplicity, with many users praising its intuitive interface and fast support—"Deffinitely the best option for hostels" is a common sentiment.
Maestro PMS is ideal if your hotel operates at a larger scale or requires more advanced features like integrated revenue management, online check-in, or multiple modules for sales, events, and spa management. With a review rating of 4.36/5 (slightly lower, but with more detailed functionality), it appeals to resorts, luxury hotels, and multi-property groups. If your needs include complex operations and extensive customization, Maestro’s modular approach makes it more suitable.
Counter shines in user experience, with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating—hotel staff find its interface clean, simple, and fast to learn. Many reviews highlight how new staff can be trained quickly, and the mobile browser design allows management on the go: "No teaching necessary," one reviewer states.
Maestro’s UI, rated at 4.04/5, is more traditional and can feel cumbersome—"Too many clicks, and too many screens that you can't bypass," reports one user. Its onboarding process is supported by training videos, but some users find the system less intuitive, especially for newer employees.
Edge: Counter.
Maestro boasts 39 exclusive features, including modules for Spa & Wellness, EPoS, revenue management, online check-in/out, guest messaging, and more—features that Counter lacks entirely. These add significant value for larger properties needing comprehensive operational control.
Counter offers a leaner feature set with 19 shared functionalities, mainly covering reservation management, POS, and basic reporting. Its simplicity is an advantage for small properties but falls short for hotels seeking advanced automation or guest engagement tools.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Counter’s support scores are impressive at 4.96/5, with reviewers praising the responsiveness of team members like Evelyn and Max: "Support is very fast and always reachable." Many appreciate the ongoing improvements, despite some bugs affecting bookings and bed availability.
Maestro’s support is also highly rated at 4.78/5, with praise for rapid response times and helpfulness. "Support answers quickly and usually resolves issues on the first call," states a user. However, some critique the UI’s dated look and the need for more detailed help menus.
Edge: Counter.
Maestro offers a significantly broader network, with 89 verified partners, including leading systems like QuickBooks, Criton, and Volo. Shared integrations include SiteMinder, which helps with online distribution.
Counter integrates with 7 partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki, but lacks the extensive ecosystem that Maestro provides. Smaller integrations can be sufficient for hostels or small properties, but larger operations may need Maestro’s expansive connectivity.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Counter benefits from recent reviews, with many users praising its ease of use and support. It maintains a high rating of 4.73/5, with 91% likelihood to recommend, especially among hostel operators. "Best PMS for hostels," says one user.
Maestro’s slightly lower rating of 4.36/5 reflects its broader feature set and more complex UI. Its users, mainly larger hotels and resorts, highlight its customization and support but note that it can be less intuitive for new staff.
Edge: Counter.
Counter is free, making it an attractive option for small hostels and budget-conscious properties. It’s a no-trial, no-implementation fee platform, ideal for operations prioritizing simplicity and low-cost management.
Maestro charges a base price of $900, with no monthly fees or implementation charges. Its pricing is aligned with larger hotels needing extensive features and customizations, offering significant value for its breadth of modules.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter stands out as the top pick for small hostels and budget hotels needing an easy, quick, and low-cost management solution. Its high satisfaction ratings, recent reviews, and intuitive design make it a strong choice for properties focused on simplicity and guest experience.
Maestro PMS is better suited for larger, more complex properties that demand a full suite of modules, extensive integrations, and a high level of customization. Its robust features and support make it the ideal choice for upscale resorts, conference centers, and multi-property groups.
If your hotel’s priorities include ease of use, recent positive reviews, and affordability, Counter is the clear leader. Conversely, if you operate a large, multi-faceted property and need a comprehensive, highly adaptable platform, Maestro will serve you better.
In summary, for small-scale and budget-conscious properties, Counter delivers simplicity and support. For larger, multi-asset hotels with complex needs, Maestro offers a feature-rich, integrated environment—your decision should align with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth trajectory.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 综合 CRS |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 27 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 提供 89 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Maestro PMS (Northwind):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Maestro PMS 的为 70。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问