The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Maxial by Maxial hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and focus. Counter is tailored for hostels, boasting a robust feature set specifically designed for smaller properties with high volume, while Maxial offers an all-in-one management suite suited for larger hotels and resorts. Both aim to streamline operations but diverge significantly in their capabilities and target markets.
Counter, with more recent reviews and a higher review count, presents a clearer picture of its ongoing performance. Maxial’s lack of reviews and recent feedback makes it difficult to gauge its current reliability or user satisfaction. So, which product better meets your hotel’s needs?
Counter excels at providing a user-friendly, mobile-optimized PMS designed for hostels, with 54 reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating. Its focus on ease of use, automation, and integrations makes daily management straightforward. Maxial, on the other hand, offers a broad management platform but has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its performance and user experience unverified.
Counter's high customer support score of 4.96/5 and ease of use rating of 4.6/5 demonstrate its reliability for busy hostel environments. Maxial’s lack of recent data leaves hoteliers uncertain about its current support quality or usability. Do you want a proven system with recent user feedback or an untested option?
If your property is a hostel, boutique, or small city hotel needing quick, intuitive management with integrated booking, Counter is the logical choice. Its strong user feedback, especially from hostels, emphasizes its simplicity, automation, and support. Maxial might appeal if you run a larger resort or hotel chain seeking extensive module integration, though its lack of recent reviews makes this speculative.
Counter’s 7 verified partners and active presence in multiple regions indicate a mature, tested product. Maxial’s absence of verified integrations and reviews suggests it’s less proven for hotel operations at this time. For hoteliers prioritizing confidence and proven features, Counter is the safer bet.
Counter’s UI is praised for being straightforward, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating backed by 54 recent reviews. Users highlight its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and mobile-friendly design, making staff adoption quick. Support responsiveness is also a standout strength.
Maxial offers no recent reviews or ratings, so its usability cannot be reliably assessed. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to determine whether Maxial provides a user-friendly experience or requires significant training. Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 exclusive features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automation tools, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking. These functionalities address core hostel needs like online booking, automated night audits, and group management.
Maxial’s feature set remains unspecified, with no data on unique capabilities or modules. Its lack of verified integrations or detailed feature count suggests it may not offer the same level of specialization or breadth as Counter. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support score of 4.96/5 derives from enthusiastic user reviews praising its quick, helpful responses — especially from team members like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate its responsiveness, even amidst system bugs, and consider support a key strength.
Maxial has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Hoteliers need confidence in post-sale assistance, and without recent feedback, Counter clearly leads here. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations facilitate payment, channel management, and access control, helping streamline your operations.
Maxial has no verified integrations listed, indicating limited or unproven connectivity with third-party platforms. For a property relying on multi-channel distribution or integrated payment solutions, Counter’s existing integrations provide a tangible advantage. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5 and 54 recent reviews provide a strong, recent indication of user satisfaction. Hospitality properties across various segments, especially hostels, rate it highly for ease of use and support, with some reviews calling it “the best PMS for hostels.”
Maxial’s lack of reviews and ratings mean there’s no recent data to gauge user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences. Until user feedback emerges, Counter’s ratings and reviews make it the more trustworthy choice. Edge: Counter.
Both Counter and Maxial do not publicly list pricing details, suggesting a custom quote process based on your property’s size and needs. Given the absence of transparent pricing, your team should request tailored quotes to compare value accurately.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive enterprise-level modules not offered in Counter, or if your property’s scale exceeds its current feature scope.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small property or if you prefer a solution with proven user feedback and recent reviews.
Counter is a highly-rated, feature-rich PMS tailored for hostels and small properties, with a clear track record of recent user satisfaction. Its ease of use, automation, and support offerings make it a solid choice for properties prioritizing simplicity and reliability.
Maxial’s lack of recent reviews and unclear feature scope make it an uncertain option. Unless your hotel operates at a larger scale and can verify Maxial’s capabilities, Counter remains the recommended choice.
If you need a system that’s proven, easy to implement, and well-supported, Counter should be your first pick. For larger properties with complex operational needs and a desire for AI-driven insights, keep an eye on Maxial’s future reviews and feature updates.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Maxial 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maxial 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Maxial:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Maxial 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问