The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 549 条经验证的评价后,HOTELTIME 用户最看重其 user interface and learning curve, 技术支援, reporting and analytics,而 Maxial 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Maxial |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
移动优化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 219 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 238 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 46 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 239 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 241 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 143 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 49 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #52 4 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 384 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 111 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 21 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is pivotal for your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. HOTELTIME PMS by HOTELTIME and Maxial both aim to streamline hotel management, but their reach, features, and support levels differ significantly. HOTELTIME’s extensive review base, recent feedback, and feature-rich platform position it as the more proven choice for hoteliers aiming for a reliable, scalable PMS.
While Maxial offers a comprehensive management approach, its current lack of reviews and regional presence makes HOTELTIME the clearer choice for most hotels. Are you ready to choose a PMS backed by proven customer satisfaction and extensive capabilities?
HOTELTIME stands out as a mature, globally recognized PMS with over 433 recent reviews, a 4.83/5 rating, and a 93% likelihood of recommendation. Its cloud-based platform covers a broad spectrum of hotel needs, integrating seamlessly with POS, CRS, and revenue management modules, supporting operations from independent boutique hotels to resorts across 32 countries.
Maxial, on the other hand, lacks recent reviews, detailed user feedback, and a visible market presence. Its platform claims a comprehensive approach but offers no verified integrations or regional deployment data. With no recent customer insights or reviews, Maxial's market credibility remains uncertain.
Given the clear gap in recent user feedback and global presence, HOTELTIME’s extensive review history and proven track record make it the better choice for hotels seeking a dependable PMS. Do you want to invest in a system with demonstrated user satisfaction and ongoing innovation?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich PMS with proven customer support, go with HOTELTIME. Its extensive modules—including integrated CRS, guest CRM, automation, and payment processing—serve properties of all sizes across multiple regions, making it ideal for hotels aiming for operational excellence.
If, however, your hotel prefers a newer, less tested platform that promises comprehensive management but lacks proven customer feedback, Maxial might be worth exploring. But without recent reviews or regional deployment data, its reliability and support efficacy remain unverified.
For most hoteliers wanting a dependable, globally tested solution, HOTELTIME’s extensive reviews and proven features make it the clear leader. Are you ready to prioritize a system backed by hundreds of recent, positive experiences?
HOTELTIME’s user interface scores 4.66/5, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive layout, quick onboarding, and seamless day-to-day management. Many users highlight its easy learning curve, with support staff praised for helping new staff adapt quickly.
Maxial offers no available ratings or detailed feedback on ease of use, which raises concerns about onboarding and staff adoption. The absence of review data makes it difficult to assess how straightforward the platform is for new users.
Edge: HOTELTIME. Its high ease-of-use score, extensive positive reviews, and clear onboarding process make it the more accessible system for your team.
HOTELTIME boasts 51 unique features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, channel management, online check-in, and more. These functionalities support end-to-end hotel operations and are frequently cited as a major strength.
Maxial provides a broad scope of modules like reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing but lacks specifics on unique features or integrations. Without detailed feature differentiation or verified modules, hotel managers lack confidence in its comprehensive capabilities.
Edge: HOTELTIME. Its extensive feature set, including many modules exclusive to HOTELTIME, offers more operational tools for your hotel.
HOTELTIME’s support scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and dedicated onboarding assistance. Customers appreciate their ongoing support and the responsiveness that minimizes operational downtime.
Maxial provides no customer support ratings or recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its service quality. The lack of verified user feedback leaves hotel managers uncertain about post-sale support and issue resolution.
Edge: HOTELTIME. With high support ratings and positive recent reviews, it is more reliable for hotel teams needing ongoing assistance.
HOTELTIME integrates with 58 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, covering a broad range of distribution, revenue, and operational tools. Its open architecture supports third-party integrations crucial for modern hotel management.
Maxial offers no listed integrations or verified partner connections, raising questions about its ability to connect with existing systems or adapt to evolving tech stacks.
Edge: HOTELTIME. Its extensive, verified integration network enables your hotel to build a flexible, interconnected management environment.
HOTELTIME’s user reviews consistently rate it 4.83/5, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability, ease of use, and strong support. Hotels across segments—including resorts, city center hotels, and boutique properties—report high satisfaction levels.
Maxial lacks recent reviews and publicly available ratings, preventing a meaningful comparison. The absence of feedback indicates limited market adoption or user experience data.
Edge: HOTELTIME. Its high, recent ratings and widespread positive feedback make it the preferred choice for hoteliers.
HOTELTIME’s pricing begins at $600 per month without a free trial or tiered options; no specific pricing info is available for Maxial. Given its extensive features and support, HOTELTIME’s cost aligns with its market position as a comprehensive PMS.
Maxial does not disclose pricing details, which complicates budgeting comparisons. Its lack of transparent pricing suggests it may be a bespoke or less mature offering.
Not ideal if:
Hotels that need a flexible, scalable, and fully integrated PMS should consider HOTELTIME. The platform’s breadth of features and robust support infrastructure make it suitable for diverse hotel types.
Not ideal if:
Given the limited publicly available data, Maxial might appeal to innovative hotels open to trying newer solutions but lacks the reassurance of proven performance.
HOTELTIME stands out as a proven, feature-rich PMS with over 430 recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and a strong support network. Its extensive integrations and global presence make it suitable for hotels of all sizes seeking a reliable management platform.
Maxial offers a broad management suite with AI-driven insights but lacks recent reviews, verified integrations, and regional deployment data, making it a less confident choice for most hotels.
For most hoteliers, HOTELTIME provides a safer, more established investment that can support their current needs and future growth. If your priority is stability, support, and proven performance, HOTELTIME is the clear winner.
This comparison reflects the latest data and customer insights, ensuring your decision is based on proven hotel management performance.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
虽然支持团队的响应速度和乐于助人的态度值得赞赏,但一些评论指出,延长技术支持时间将进一步提升用户体验,确保随时都能获得帮助,特别是对于国际用户而言。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HotelTime PMS 和 Maxial 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelTime PMS 提供 58 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maxial 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelTime PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HotelTime PMS:否。Maxial:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HOTELTIME 的 HT Score 为 92,Maxial 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问