Counter vs. Medialog: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 57 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking.

Medialog 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and On premise.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Counter 与 Medialog 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
17
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $400/mo
经验证的评价 57 0

Counter 与 Medialog 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Medialog 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Counter Counter Medialog Medialog
优点
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 客户支持
+ 自动化功能
+ 平台集成
缺点
错误问题
报告和收入管理
价格

Counter 对比 Medialog:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Counter Counter Medialog Medialog
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 28 条评价 #76 0 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #46 4 条评价 #72 0 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #32 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #31 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Counter Counter Medialog Medialog
精品酒店 #31 16 条评价 #75 0 条评价
豪华酒店 #44 4 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #43 4 条评价 #68 0 条评价
长住酒店 #32 5 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Counter Counter Medialog Medialog
北美 #25 8 条评价
欧洲 #20 25 条评价 #52 0 条评价
亚太 #16 4 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and Medialog by Medialog hinges on your property's specific needs. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but Counter excels as a straightforward PMS for hostels, while Medialog offers a more extensive, integrated solution suited for hotels and restaurants. Your decision should depend on whether you prioritize ease of use and quick deployment or a broader feature set and industry experience.

Counter is a recent entrant with a strong reputation supported by 54 reviews and a high overall rating of 4.73/5, indicating current, positive user experiences. Medialog, with no recent reviews and a score of 0, lacks fresh feedback, making Counter the more reliable choice based on recent data.

Is Counter or Medialog Better for Hotels?

Counter and Medialog both serve hotels, but their target audiences differ. Counter is designed predominantly for hostels, with 83% of its users in that segment, highlighting its simplicity and focus on hostel-specific needs. Its reviews emphasize ease of use, fast onboarding, and affordability, making it ideal for small to medium hostels seeking straightforward management.

Medialog, on the other hand, claims a broader scope, serving hotels and restaurants, with its extensive feature list including EPoS, revenue management, and integrated CRS. However, the lack of recent feedback suggests Medialog's primary strength is its longstanding presence and experience rather than current performance.

If your property is a hostel or a small boutique hotel that values rapid deployment and intuitive operations, Counter is likely more fitting. If you operate a larger hotel or restaurant requiring complex integrations and advanced features, Medialog might seem appealing but lacks recent reviews to confirm its current efficacy.

Are you looking for a proven, highly-rated solution tailored for hostels, or a comprehensive system with a longer industry history but no recent user feedback?

Counter vs Medialog: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a simple, efficient PMS that minimizes training and gets operations running quickly, Counter is the clear winner. Its 54 reviews and 4.73/5 score demonstrate current satisfaction, especially among hostel operators, with features like easy check-in/out, POS integration, and automatic payments.

If your hotel requires advanced revenue management, integrated CRS, or on-premise solutions, Medialog’s extensive feature set could be advantageous. However, the absence of recent reviews makes it impossible to confirm that it still meets modern hospitality demands at the same level.

For small hostels prioritizing usability and cost-effectiveness, Counter is the better fit. For larger, complex properties seeking a customizable, long-established platform, Medialog may be suitable—if proven by current performance.

Is Counter or Medialog Easier to Use?

Counter's user interface consistently receives high marks, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews from 54 users. Users praise its simplicity, intuitive navigation, and quick onboarding, often remarking that staff can learn it with minimal training and manage operations remotely.

Medialog's interface and user experience are not rated in the recent reviews, and no user feedback is available to assess its ease of use. Its long history suggests a mature platform, yet without updated reviews, current usability remains unverified.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Medialog?

Counter offers a focused set of features optimized for hostel management, including bed availability display, automatic payments, POS system integration, and channel management. It also provides unique features like ancillary revenue tracking, aligning well with hostel operational needs.

Medialog boasts a broader suite with 10 features exclusive to its platform, such as EPoS, revenue management, GDPR and PCI compliance, and native email marketing. Its added features cater to larger or more complex properties that need integrated restaurant and hotel management tools.

If your priorities are core hostel operations and easy automation, Counter’s streamlined features are sufficient. For hotels or resorts seeking comprehensive, industry-tailored tools, Medialog's extensive feature list is compelling.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Medialog?

Counter’s customer support is highly rated, with a 4.96/5 rating and reviews highlighting fast, responsive, and helpful assistance. Testimonials mention staff like Evelyn and Max as go-to contacts, often responding within minutes to queries.

Medialog lacks recent reviews, so its support quality remains unverified. While it touts 24/7 service and long-standing industry presence, current user experiences are unknown, making Counter the safer choice for reliable support.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Medialog?

Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds. It supports essential integrations for small to medium hostels, but its network is limited compared to Medialog.

Medialog offers 41 verified integrations, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, and specialized tools such as HQ revenue, Fairmas, and RoomChecking. Its extensive partner list suits hotels looking to connect with a broad range of industry solutions.

For quick, straightforward integrations, Counter suffices. For extensive connectivity and advanced channel management, Medialog’s larger partner network is advantageous.

Edge: Medialog.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Medialog?

Counter’s recent reviews showcase a 4.73/5 overall rating with 54 reviews, predominantly from hostel operators. Hotel segments such as independent and boutique hotels rate it around 4/5, emphasizing its ease of use and support.

Medialog, lacking recent reviews, receives no current ratings or feedback. Its long presence in the industry does not compensate for the absence of fresh user insights.

Based on current data, Counter clearly has the higher user rating, reflecting ongoing satisfaction.

Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and Medialog Cost?

Counter does not publicly disclose pricing, but it is known as a free PMS targeted at hostels, making it highly affordable and accessible for small budgets. Its value proposition is built around simplicity and cost-effectiveness without monthly fees.

Medialog charges a base price of $400 per month, with no mention of additional fees or optional modules. Its pricing suggests a solution aimed at larger establishments or those seeking an extensive feature set.

For budget-conscious properties, Counter’s free model is compelling. Larger hotels needing advanced features may find Medialog’s fee justified, but no recent quotes are available for detailed comparison.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that operate primarily as hostels, B&Bs, or inns, especially those with limited budgets.
  • Teams that prioritize ease of use, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training.
  • Properties needing mobile-friendly, remote management capabilities.
  • Hotels that value automated processes like POS integration and contactless check-in.
  • Not ideal if your property requires complex revenue management, extensive integrations, or detailed reporting.

Counter’s design suits small to medium hostels that want straightforward operations, quick setup, and responsive support. It’s best for properties that value simplicity over extensive customization.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Medialog?

  • Hotels or restaurants requiring a comprehensive, all-in-one management platform.
  • Properties with complex operations that benefit from integrated CRS, EPoS, and revenue management.
  • Establishments aiming for long-term scalability with industry-specific features.
  • Hotels that need reliable, 24/7 support and extensive third-party integrations.
  • Not ideal if you seek a lightweight, easy-to-deploy system or lack the resources to manage a more complex platform.

Medialog suits larger, service-oriented properties that need a flexible, customizable solution supported by decades of industry experience.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter stands out as a highly-rated, user-friendly PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with recent reviews backing its effectiveness. Its core strengths lie in ease of use, support, and affordability, making it the sensible choice for budget-conscious or fast-growing properties.

Medialog offers a broad, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a long history in the hospitality industry. However, its lack of recent reviews raises questions about its current performance and user satisfaction.

If your hotel values simplicity, affordability, and proven current performance, go with Counter. If you require a highly customizable, integrated solution and can invest in a more complex platform, Medialog could be suitable—pending confirmation of current support quality and features.


In conclusion, for most modern hoteliers seeking a reliable, well-rated PMS with active support and recent positive reviews, Counter remains the recommended choice. Its focus on hostel management and recent user satisfaction make it the safer, more data-backed option.

Counter 和 Medialog 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Counter Counter Medialog Medialog
Starting Price From $400/mo

Counter 有哪些 Medialog 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Medialog 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Counter Counter Medialog Medialog
EPoS
原生电子邮件营销
在前提
收益管理模块
礼品卡
综合 CRS
辅助收入跟踪

Counter 对比 Medialog:总结

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 来自 57 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和可用性 83% 正面

酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。

客户支持 98% 正面

Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。

自动化功能 83% 正面

用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误问题 86% 负面

几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。

报告和收入管理 50% 负面

酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #46 vs #72
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 vs #76
住宿加早餐与客栈 #30 vs #74
精品酒店 #31 vs #75

独特功能

辅助收入跟踪
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料
Medialog
Medialog
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价

独特功能

EPoS 收益管理模块 综合 CRS 在前提 礼品卡
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 41 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
易用性 Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Counter 与 Medialog 的常见问题

Counter 能否替代 Medialog?

这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Medialog 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Medialog 提供 41 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Counter 或 Medialog 是否提供免费方案?

Counter:否。Medialog:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 Medialog?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Medialog 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息