The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Newway |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Newway |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Newway |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Newway by Newway hinges on your property’s operational needs. Both aim to improve efficiency, but Counter offers an all-in-one PMS tailored for hostels, while Newway specializes in revenue management, although it currently lacks a functioning user base or reviews. Are you looking for a comprehensive management system or a tool focused solely on revenue optimization?
Counter is an established PMS with a broad feature set, especially suited for hostel operators, whereas Newway appears to be a nascent platform without recent user feedback. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize an integrated PMS or a specialized tool for revenue.
With more than 50 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.73/5, Counter’s reputation is significantly stronger. Newway has no reviews or market presence yet, making Counter the more reliable choice for your hotel today.
Counter is a fully developed property management system designed for small to medium hostels, offering features like channel management, payment processing, booking engine, guest CRM, and housekeeping modules. It has a user-friendly interface rated 4.6/5, with a high customer support score of 4.96/5, and is praised for its ease of use and mobile compatibility.
In contrast, Newway lacks reviews, a rating, or detailed features, suggesting it’s still in early development or market entry phases. While Newway markets itself as a revenue management tool, it currently offers no user feedback or operational data, making Counter the more dependable solution.
Are you willing to adopt a platform with proven performance and community validation, or are you considering an untested solution with no user insights? Given the data, Counter’s proven track record makes it the clearer choice.
If your hotel needs a full-featured PMS that integrates channel management, payments, guest profiles, reporting, and automation, Counter is the clear winner. Its extensive feature set, used by over 50 hotels, including hostels and boutique hotels, makes it suitable for operators seeking a comprehensive solution.
If, however, your focus is exclusively on revenue optimization, and you are willing to gamble on a platform with no current reviews or market presence, Newway might eventually suit your needs. But with no existing customer base or proven features, Counter’s reliability and user feedback make it the safer choice for your property now.
Counter’s interface is rated 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitiveness and straightforward navigation. Onboarding is similarly rated at 4.7/5, and users report staff adoption is quick, with minimal training required.
There is no available data or reviews for Newway’s user experience, which suggests it may lack the polish and user familiarity Counter offers. Given the proven positive feedback on Counter’s UI and onboarding process, Edge: Counter.
Counter provides 19 unique features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, calendar view, custom rates, group functionality, automated night audits, guest CRM, multi-currency/multilingual support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are tailored specifically for hostel and small hotel management.
Newway currently offers no detailed feature list or unique functionalities. While it emphasizes AI-driven revenue management, the absence of concrete features or a comparable feature count indicates Counter’s offerings are more mature and comprehensive. Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts a customer support score of 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and dedicated staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the support’s responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, though some mention slower responses in certain time zones.
Newway, lacking reviews or support ratings, provides no insight into its customer service quality. Given Counter’s strong support reputation and recent positive feedback, Edge: Counter.
Counter has established integrations with seven verified partners, including WuBook, FLYR Hospitality, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Channex, Goki, and Stripe. These integrations facilitate channel management, payment processing, and access control, adding flexibility for your operations.
Newway has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its connectivity options currently. The availability of multiple integrations with Counter gives it a decisive edge for hotels seeking seamless operational linking. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s ratings are high across all categories, with 54 reviews in the past six months and a 91% likelihood of recommendation, mainly from hostel and boutique hotel segments. Its recent review count and high scores underscore strong user satisfaction.
Newway has no reviews or recent feedback, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment. Until Newway demonstrates proven performance, Counter remains the preferred option for hoteliers prioritizing community-vetted solutions. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose its pricing but offers a free, no-trial, all-in-one PMS, implying an accessible, potentially flexible model for small to medium properties. Its value stems from its extensive features and support, making it a cost-effective option.
Newway also does not provide explicit pricing details, suggesting it may be in early stages or still developing its pricing structure. Given the lack of transparent costs and user reviews, Counter’s established value proposition makes it the more predictable investment.
Not ideal if you need extensive revenue management or dynamic pricing tools—Counter’s focus is more operational than financial optimization.
Not ideal if you need an all-in-one PMS, reliable customer support, or proven integrations—Newway lacks a current user base, reviews, and detailed feature sets.
Counter by Counter offers a proven, feature-rich PMS designed specifically for hostels and small hotels, with high customer satisfaction and extensive integrations. Its ease of use and support make it ideal for properties seeking operational streamlining today.
Newway by Newway appears to be an emerging revenue management platform lacking reviews, proven features, or a customer base. While its AI focus is promising, it remains untested in the hotel industry and unsuitable as a standalone management solution.
For hoteliers wanting a reliable, community-validated PMS, Counter is the clear choice. If your hotel is prepared to experiment with a nascent platform solely for revenue optimization, Newway could be an option in the future, but not now.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Newway 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Newway 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Newway:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Newway 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问