The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Resly PMS by Resly hinges heavily on your hotel’s specific operational needs. Both systems address core property management functions, but Counter’s primary focus is on hostel management with a straightforward interface, while Resly emphasizes managing management rights and short-term holiday rentals with a broader technological suite. Do you prioritize ease of use and industry-specific features, or do you need a system tailored for complex management structures?
Counter’s extensive reviews, recent updates, and high ratings mark it as a more established player, especially within the hostel segment. Resly’s niche focus and limited review data make it less proven in comparison. Which features and support levels are most crucial for your decision?
Counter offers a highly rated PMS primarily for hostels and small accommodations, with a user satisfaction score of 4.73/5 based on 54 reviews, most within the last six months. It’s favored for its ease of use, support, and automation. Resly, with no recent reviews or ratings, appears less validated, especially for hoteliers seeking robust, proven solutions.
If your hotel operates in the hostel segment or values a system with a strong support community, Counter is the clear choice. For management rights or complex holiday letting, Resly may be suitable, but its limited review data is a concern.
Counter and Resly serve different hotel profiles, with Counter excelling in hostel environments. Counter’s interface is praised for its simplicity and fast onboarding, making it a strong match if your team needs quick, reliable management of guest bookings, check-ins, and integrations with POS and channel managers.
Resly, by contrast, targets property management rights and short-term holiday rentals, focusing on trust accounting and managing multiple property types. It offers a broader feature set, including guest communication, automated reminders, and real-time reporting, but lacks recent user feedback to confirm its performance.
The critical question is whether your hotel prioritizes a dedicated hostel management system or a broader property management platform for diverse rental models.
Counter’s ease of use is supported by a 4.6/5 user rating and positive reviews praising its intuitive interface. Users highlight its mobile friendliness, straightforward calendar management, and quick staff onboarding. Support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with comments emphasizing fast, helpful responses.
Resly’s user experience is less documented, but its marketing emphasizes simplicity and ease of management for complex rental operations. However, the lack of recent reviews means we lack current data on its usability and onboarding.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 15 shared features plus 4 unique functionalities, such as online 24/7 support, automated night audit, and multi-lingual capabilities. Its strengths lie in integrations with platforms like Stripe and Goki, making it suitable for hostel operations with automated payments and access control.
Resly boasts 30 features exclusive to its platform, including guest messaging, automated reminders, digital registration, real-time status updates, and a comprehensive suite for managing multiple properties and tasks. Its feature set is broader but unverified through recent user feedback.
Edge: Resly, for its extensive feature list.
Counter’s support team is highly praised, with a 4.96/5 rating and reviews highlighting quick, professional responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the responsiveness, though some note support can be slower in certain time zones.
Resly’s customer support data is unavailable, making it difficult to evaluate its responsiveness or quality. Without recent reviews, the support experience remains uncertain.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Goki, Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and others. Its integrations cover key operational areas like payment processing, channel management, and access control, which are vital for hostel operators.
Resly integrates with only 2 verified partners, notably Goki and RoomPriceGenie, limiting its connectivity options. While Resly’s features are comprehensive, fewer integrations may restrict expansion and automation.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s ratings are recent and robust: a 4.73/5 overall score, with a 91% likelihood to recommend based on 54 reviews. Hoteliers in the hostel segment rate it particularly highly, with some praising its simplicity and support.
Resly lacks recent reviews and publicly available ratings, making it impossible to determine current user satisfaction. Its niche focus suggests it may cater well to management rights but without validated feedback, its broader appeal is uncertain.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly list prices, and neither offers a free trial or tiered pricing publicly. As of now, detailed pricing models are unavailable, so your team should contact vendors for quotes tailored to your property size and needs.
Not ideal if you require detailed revenue management or extensive reporting features.
Not ideal if you need a proven, highly-rated PMS with extensive recent user feedback or broader third-party integrations.
Counter by Counter offers a well-tested, highly-rated PMS focusing on hostels and small accommodations. Its ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support make it an excellent choice for properties looking for simplicity and proven reliability.
Resly by Resly, with its extensive features for management rights and holiday rentals, remains less validated due to the absence of recent reviews. Its broader feature set may appeal to complex operators but carries higher risk without user feedback.
If your hotel values a trusted, mature platform with a strong support community and recent positive reviews, Counter is the definitive choice. For specialized management of multiple properties with complex needs, Resly could be considered once more reviews become available.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Resly PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Resly PMS 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Resly PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Resly 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问