The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 379 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 RMS 用户则强调 技术支持和学习资源, 可扩展性和功能深度, 信托会计支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
技术支持和学习资源
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
可扩展性和功能深度
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
信托会计支持
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
在线渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
预订引擎和移动界面
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
报告编写者的灵活性
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
−
POS系统集成
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #7 147 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #8 102 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #32 2 条评价 | #8 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #31 1 条评价 | #7 8 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #11 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #13 57 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #9 50 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #3 65 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #11 63 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #23 20 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 4 条评价 | #12 10 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #8 7 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel’s operations. With Counter and RMS both targeting different segments and offering distinct features, your decision hinges on your property's needs and your team’s priorities. Counter excels for hostels with its simplicity and affordability, while RMS offers a broad feature set suited for larger, more complex operations. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans and daily workflows?
Counter is designed specifically for hostels and small properties, offering a simple, easy-to-use interface with a focus on core operations like reservations, check-ins, and payments. RMS, by contrast, provides a comprehensive suite of tools that caters to a wide range of property types, from resorts to RV parks, with features like revenue management, guest profiles, and detailed reporting.
While Counter’s review count is low (54 reviews, all within the last 6 months), RMS's larger base of 293 reviews and more recent feedback provide a more robust understanding of its capabilities and support quality. RMS's reviews highlight its depth, scalability, and extensive integrations, making it a preferred choice for properties looking to expand or handle complex operations. Counter’s reviews emphasize ease of use, quick onboarding, and support responsiveness, especially valued in the hostel niche.
Do you prioritize simplicity and quick setup over in-depth features, or are you looking for a system that can scale with your property’s growth and complexity?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, budget-friendly PMS with minimal fuss, Counter is the way to go. It’s ideal for hostels and small properties that want a mobile-friendly, easy-to-train platform with basic integrated POS and automation features. For properties that primarily operate in the hostel segment, Counter’s user-friendly design and quick onboarding make it a solid choice, especially since it’s free with no implementation fees.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive property management system capable of handling multiple revenue streams, advanced reporting, and integrations with numerous OTAs and POS systems, RMS is the better fit. Its extensive feature set (55 unique features) supports large or growing hotels, resorts, and RV parks, offering tools like revenue management, guest CRM, and online check-in. RMS’s scalability and depth make it ideal for properties aiming to streamline complex operations and maximize revenue.
In summary, choose Counter for simplicity and affordability, and RMS for extensive functionality and growth potential.
Counter scores higher on usability, with a 4.6/5 rating compared to RMS’s 4.28/5. Its interface is praised for being clean, intuitive, and mobile-friendly, allowing staff to learn quickly and manage operations on the go. Users highlight its straightforward calendar and reservation management, enabling fast onboarding and easy daily use.
RMS, while comprehensive, has a slightly steeper learning curve, partly due to its extensive feature set. Support is praised for responsiveness, but some users mention the need for more tutorials and clearer navigation. RMS’s interface is functional but can be overwhelming for smaller teams or properties new to PMS technology.
Edge: Counter.
RMS offers 55 unique features, including integrated CRS, revenue management, guest profiles, online booking engine, POS, housekeeping modules, and advanced reporting. Its capabilities support complex operations like multi-currency management, digital registration, and guest communication tools.
Counter, with no exclusive features beyond its core PMS for hostels, has a limited feature set—7 verified partners and essential functions like reservations, POS, and automation—but lacks many advanced modules found in RMS. Its simplicity is a strength for small operations but falls short for larger properties needing specialized tools.
Edge: RMS.
Counter’s support receives consistent praise for its quick, friendly, and helpful responses, with an overall support rating of 4.96/5. Reviewers mention staff like Evelyn and Max as highly professional and responsive, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. The support team’s flexibility and recent improvements are noted as key strengths.
RMS support is also well-regarded, with a 4.48/5 rating, praised for knowledgeable and proactive assistance. However, some users express a desire for more digital resources and tutorials to maximize system use. RMS’s larger scale sometimes results in longer wait times or less personalized attention for smaller clients.
Edge: Counter.
RMS boasts 112 verified integrations, including major channels and systems like SiteMinder, Criton, STR, and native email marketing. Its extensive partner network supports large-scale, multi-channel distribution and advanced operational needs.
Counter’s 7 verified partners include essential integrations like Stripe, Goki, and WuBook, but it offers fewer options overall. Its integration focus is on simple, reliable connections suited for small properties, with less emphasis on large multi-channel connectivity.
Edge: RMS.
Counter has a small but highly satisfied user base within the hostel segment, with an average rating of 4.73/5 and recent reviews emphasizing ease of use, fast onboarding, and helpful support. Its user ratings for properties like hostels and inns are particularly high (4.75/5), reflecting strong satisfaction in its niche.
RMS’s broader user base (including resorts, motels, and branded hotels) rates it slightly lower at 4.56/5, citing its extensive capabilities and scalability. Larger hotels benefit from its depth, but smaller properties sometimes find it overwhelming or less intuitive.
Given the recent and higher review count, RMS’s rating is more representative of its overall performance.
Edge: RMS.
Counter doesn’t publish explicit pricing, but it is described as a free product with no implementation fees, making it highly attractive for small properties or hostels with tight budgets.
RMS costs $800/month, with no free tier or trial mentioned. Its pricing reflects its enterprise-level features, suited for larger properties that see value in a comprehensive, scalable system.
If budget is your primary concern and your property is small, Counter offers a clear advantage. For larger operations, RMS’s investment may translate into better automation and revenue potential.
Not ideal if you need advanced features like revenue management, detailed reporting, or extensive integrations. Larger properties or those with complex operational requirements will find Counter’s simplicity limiting.
Not ideal if your property is a small hostel or inn that only requires basic reservation management. If your focus is minimal automation and low costs, RMS’s extensive features might be more than you need.
RMS provides a broad, deeply integrated platform suitable for hotels aiming to grow and manage complex operations efficiently. Its extensive feature set, integrations, and scalability make it the preferred choice for medium to large properties.
Counter is a streamlined, easy-to-use PMS designed for hostels and small hotels with simple needs. Its affordability, quick onboarding, and high satisfaction ratings in its niche make it ideal for properties seeking basic, reliable management without extensive complexity.
Choose RMS if your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable platform that supports growth and complex operations. Opt for Counter if you prioritize simplicity, quick implementation, and cost-effectiveness, especially in the hostel segment.
In conclusion, RMS dominates in features, integrations, and recent reviews, making it the best option for larger or expanding hotels. Counter shines in ease of use, support, and affordability, making it the top pick for hostels and small properties.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功... RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功能的效用。
RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务... RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务等。这种全面性使酒店能够有效地简化各种运营流程。
用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能... 用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能显著降低了操作复杂性,使物业经理能够专注于其他关键任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
预订系统评价褒贬不一,用户呼吁提升其功能完善度和移动端友好性。建议包括简化预订流程,并考虑为回头客提供免费预订服务,以增强客户忠诚度并促进重复消费。
尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而... 尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而无需从头开始重新构建报表。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,RMS 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问