The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 157 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking.
roommaster 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
基于 HTR 上 157 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 100 |
在分析了 157 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 自动化功能, 平台集成,而 roommaster 用户则强调 预订管理, 集中式数据管理, 云和移动访问。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
|
+
价格
▾
|
+
Ampliphi 的定价建议
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #29 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically impact your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Counter by Counter and roommaster PMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve different hotel segments and operational needs. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize ease of use for hostels or comprehensive features for independent hotels. What are the key differences that will influence your choice?
Counter and roommaster PMS are designed to address core hotel management challenges—reservation handling, guest communications, and operational efficiency. Counter is tailored for hostels and small properties, emphasizing simplicity and mobility, while roommaster caters to independent hotels with a broader suite of features and deeper integrations. Do you need a straightforward system for hostels or a full-scale management platform for larger properties?
Counter's focus on hostel management means it offers an intuitive, mobile-friendly interface that simplifies check-ins, check-outs, and reservations. Roommaster, on the other hand, provides extensive operational tools like automated reporting, centralized data, and over 270 reports, making it suitable for hotels with more complex needs. Does your property require a lightweight interface or a detailed operational backbone?
Given the recent review count and higher overall ratings, Counter's more recent reviews strengthen its position. Are you willing to trade some advanced features for proven ease of use and rapid onboarding?
If your hotel operates mainly as a hostel, with a focus on simplicity, affordability, and mobility, Counter is the better choice. Its user-friendly interface, mobile accessibility, and specific hostel features make it suitable for small and medium-sized hostels seeking efficiency.
Conversely, if your hotel is a boutique, independent, or resort property that needs detailed reporting, centralized control, and robust reservation management, roommaster PMS will serve you better. Its extensive feature set—such as integrated revenue management, guest communication, and over 270 reports—caters to more complex operational environments.
In summary, choose Counter for a straightforward, budget-friendly hostel management solution, and opt for roommaster if your property demands comprehensive, customizable management features. Your decision should align with your property size, complexity, and growth plans.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with users praising its simple, intuitive interface that loads seamlessly on mobile browsers. Hoteliers highlight its quick onboarding and staff training, noting that even non-technical team members can operate it efficiently. Support from Counter's team is frequently praised for responsiveness, with Evelyn and Max often mentioned.
In contrast, roommaster's ease of use is rated lower at 4.22/5, with some users describing the interface as "clunky" and noting that it can be slow to navigate. Support experiences vary; some praise quick responses, while others report delays and inconsistent help.
Edge: Counter.
roommaster offers a significantly larger feature set—44 features exclusive to its platform, including EPoS, revenue management, integrated payment terminals, guest feedback, guest messaging, and group booking engines. These features support detailed operational control, automation, and data analytics for hotels with complex needs.
Counter provides 3 unique features—multi-currency, multi-lingual, and ancillary revenue tracking—focused on basic hostel management. While it integrates with platforms like Stripe and Goki, it lacks the extensive automation, reporting, and guest engagement tools found in roommaster.
Edge: roommaster.
Counter's customer support scores a 4.96/5, with recent reviews emphasizing fast, helpful, and friendly service from dedicated support staff. Users frequently mention Evelyn and Max for their professionalism and quick problem resolution, which contributes to a smoother onboarding process.
roommaster's support rating drops to 4.25/5, with reviews indicating inconsistency. Some users report prompt help, while others experience delays and less knowledgeable agents. The support experience seems more variable, impacting daily operations for some users.
Edge: Counter.
roommaster boasts 56 verified integrations, making it a versatile choice for properties that rely on multiple third-party systems. It supports integrations with key partners like Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and others, facilitating a connected tech stack.
Counter has 7 verified integrations, including partners like Stripe, Goki, Cloudbeds, and Channex, enough for basic operational needs, especially in hostels. Its limited integrations may restrict scalability for properties with more complex tech ecosystems.
Edge: roommaster.
Counter’s overall rating is 4.73/5, with 54 reviews and a recent review count of zero in the last six months. Its high NPS score (9.02/5) and 91% likelihood to recommend demonstrate strong user satisfaction, especially among hostel operators.
roommaster’s rating is 4.33/5 based on 83 reviews, with 17 recent reviews in the last six months. Although it has a solid reputation, the recent reviews suggest some users experience issues, reflecting the variability in support and usability.
Given the higher review count and recent reviews, roommaster's data is less current and slightly less positive overall.
Edge: Counter.
Counter is free, making it highly accessible for hostels and small properties with tight budgets. However, detailed pricing for more advanced features or enterprise plans isn’t specified, indicating potential costs for future upgrades or integrations.
roommaster’s base price starts at $500 per month, with no free trial or freemium options. Its pricing reflects the platform's extensive feature set and suitability for larger or more complex properties.
Not ideal if your hotel needs detailed revenue management, advanced reporting, or extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small hostel or niche property that doesn’t require complex operational features.
Counter offers a straightforward, cost-effective solution tailored for hostels and small hotels, emphasizing ease of use and rapid onboarding. Its recent reviews highlight high user satisfaction, especially in support and simplicity, but it lacks some advanced features found in larger platforms.
roommaster provides a comprehensive management system suitable for independent hotels and resorts that need detailed reporting, automation, and extensive integrations. Its larger feature set supports complex operations but comes with a higher price point and potentially steeper learning curve.
For hostel operators or small properties prioritizing ease, affordability, and recent positive feedback, Counter is the safer choice. Larger hotels or those requiring detailed control, automation, and scalability should opt for roommaster, despite its higher cost and complexity.
This comparison aims to help you make an informed decision aligned with your property’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions. Both products serve distinct hotel segments effectively, but your specific operational needs will dictate the best fit.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 roommaster PMS 共享 16 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 35 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问